A Biomechanical Re-Examination of Physical Activity Measurement with Accelerometers

ActiGraph is the most common accelerometer in physical activity research, but it has measurement errors due to restrictive frequency filtering. This study investigated biomechanically how different frequency filtering of accelerometer data affects assessment of activity intensity and age-group differences when measuring physical activity. Data from accelerometer at the hip and motion capture system was recorded during treadmill walking and running from 30 subjects in three different age groups: 10, 15, and >20 years old. Acceleration data was processed to ActiGraph counts with original band-pass filter at 1.66 Hz, to counts with wider filter at either 4 or 10 Hz, and to unfiltered acceleration according to “Euclidian norm minus one” (ENMO). Internal and external power, step frequency, and vertical displacement of center of mass (VD) were estimated from the motion capture data. Widening the frequency filter improved the relationship between higher locomotion speed and counts. It also removed age-group differences and decreased within-group variation. While ActiGraph counts were almost exclusively explained by VD, the counts from the 10 Hz filter were explained by VD and step frequency to an equal degree. In conclusion, a wider frequency filter improves assessment of physical activity intensity by more accurately capturing individual gait patterns.

[1]  Brad Aisbett,et al.  Validity of an upper-body-mounted accelerometer to measure peak vertical and resultant force during running and change-of-direction tasks , 2013, Sports biomechanics.

[2]  Joss Langford,et al.  Autocalibration of accelerometer data for free-living physical activity assessment using local gravity and temperature: an evaluation on four continents , 2014, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  A. Minetti,et al.  Biomechanical and physiological aspects of legged locomotion in humans , 2002, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[4]  P. D. Watson,et al.  Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  S. Hasan,et al.  Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  G. Cavagna Force platforms as ergometers. , 1975, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  Marcelo Romanzini,et al.  Calibration of ActiGraph GT3X, Actical and RT3 accelerometers in adolescents , 2014, European journal of sport science.

[8]  Alexander Horsch,et al.  Separating Movement and Gravity Components in an Acceleration Signal and Implications for the Assessment of Human Daily Physical Activity , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  A. Fenning,et al.  Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies , 2016, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[10]  Paul B Gastin,et al.  Validity of a trunk-mounted accelerometer to assess peak accelerations during walking, jogging and running , 2015, European journal of sport science.

[11]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Effect of monitor placement and of activity setting on the MTI accelerometer output. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  P A Willems,et al.  The mechanics of running in children , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  T. Perneger What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments , 1998, BMJ.

[14]  E. P. Mccutcheon,et al.  Body acceleration distribution and O2 uptake in humans during running and jumping. , 1980, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[15]  J. Kavanagh,et al.  Coordination of head and trunk accelerations during walking , 2005, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[16]  JAN CHRISTIAN BRØND,et al.  Generating ActiGraph Counts from Raw Acceleration Recorded by an Alternative Monitor , 2017, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  Dinesh John,et al.  Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. , 2011, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[18]  P. Willems,et al.  Mechanical work and muscular efficiency in walking children , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  Torsten Bumgarner,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 2013 .

[20]  Francisco B. Ortega,et al.  Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations , 2017, Sports Medicine.

[21]  PATTY S. FREEDSON,et al.  Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus , 2015, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  Dinesh John,et al.  Biomechanical examination of the ‘plateau phenomenon’ in ActiGraph vertical activity counts , 2012, Physiological measurement.

[23]  C. Compher,et al.  Best practice methods to apply to measurement of resting metabolic rate in adults: a systematic review. , 2006, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[24]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  G. Cavagna,et al.  Mechanical power and efficiency in running children , 2001, Pflügers Archiv.

[26]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[27]  David R Bassett,et al.  Calibration and validation of wearable monitors. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.