Aggregating social media data with temporal and environmental context for recommendation in a mobile tour guide system

Purpose Manufacturers of smartphone devices are increasingly utilising a diverse range of sensors. This innovation has enabled developers to accurately determine a user’s current context. One area that has been significantly enhanced by the increased use of context in mobile applications is tourism. Traditionally, tour guide applications rely heavily on location and essentially ignore other types of context. This has led to problems of inappropriate suggestions and tourists experiencing information overload. These problems can be mitigated if appropriate personalisation and content filtering is performed. This research proposes an intelligent context-aware recommender system that aims to minimise the highlighted problems. Design/methodology/approach Intelligent reasoning was performed to determine the weight or importance of different types of environmental and temporal context. Environmental context such as the weather outside can have an impact on the suitability of tourist attractions. Temporal context can be the time of day or season; this is particularly important in tourism as it is largely a seasonal activity. Social context such as social media can potentially provide an indication of the “mood” of an attraction. These types of contexts are combined with location data and the context of the user to provide a more effective recommendation to tourists. The evaluation of the system is a user study that utilised both qualitative and quantitative methods, involving 40 participants of differing gender, age group, number of children and marital status. Findings This study revealed that the participants selected the context-based recommendation at a significantly higher level than either location-based recommendation or random recommendation. It was clear from analysing the questionnaire results that location is not the only influencing factor when deciding on a tourist attraction to visit. Research limitations/implications To effectively determine the success of the recommender system, various combinations of contextual conditions were simulated. Simulating contexts provided the ability to randomly assign different contextual conditions to ensure an effective recommendation under all circumstances. This is not a reflection of the “real world”, because in a “real world” field study the majority of the contextual conditions will be similar. For example, if a tourist visited numerous attractions in one day, then it is likely that the weather conditions would be the same for the majority of the day, especially in the summer season. Practical implications Utilising this type of recommender system would allow the tourists to “go their own way” rather than following a prescribed route. By using this system, tourists can co-create their own experience using both social media and mobile technology. This increases the need to retain user preferences and have it available for multiple destinations. The application will be able to learn further through multiple trips, and as a result, the personalisation aspect will be incrementally refined over time. This extensible aspect is increasingly important as personalisation is gradually more effective as more data is collated. Originality/value This paper contributes to the body of knowledge that currently exists regarding the study of utilising contextual conditions in mobile recommender systems. The novelty of the system proposed by this research is the combination of various types of temporal, environmental and personal context data to inform a recommendation in an extensible tourism application. Also, performing sentiment analysis on social media data has not previously been integrated into a tourist recommender system. The evaluation concludes that this research provides clear evidence for the benefits of combining social media data with environmental and temporal context to provide an effective recommendation.

[1]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Developing a context-aware electronic tourist guide: some issues and experiences , 2000, CHI.

[2]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Towards a Better Understanding of Context and Context-Awareness , 1999, HUC.

[3]  Robin D. Burke,et al.  Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments , 2002, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[4]  Bernd Ludwig,et al.  Context-Aware Places of Interest Recommendations for Mobile Users , 2011, HCI.

[5]  Hojung Cha,et al.  LifeMap: A Smartphone-Based Context Provider for Location-Based Services , 2011, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[6]  Z. Mao,et al.  Goodbye maps, hello apps? Exploring the influential determinants of travel app adoption , 2015 .

[7]  Ari Rappoport,et al.  Enhanced Sentiment Learning Using Twitter Hashtags and Smileys , 2010, COLING.

[8]  Concetto Spampinato,et al.  Content based recommender system by using eye gaze data , 2012, ETRA.

[9]  Zhiliang Zhu,et al.  Smart Location-Aware Service Platform for Business Operation , 2010, 2010 IEEE 7th International Conference on E-Business Engineering.

[10]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Context-aware systems: the 'right' information, at the 'right' time, in the 'right' place, in the 'right' way, to the 'right' person , 2012, AVI.

[11]  Aurkene Alzua-Sorzabal,et al.  Conceptualizing Context in an Intelligent Mobile Environment in Travel and Tourism , 2013, ENTER.

[12]  Keith W. Ross,et al.  What's in a Name: A Study of Names, Gender Inference, and Gender Behavior in Facebook , 2011, DASFAA Workshops.

[13]  Johannes Schöning,et al.  Theme issue on personal projection , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[14]  Wann-Yih Wu,et al.  Factors associated with medical travel behaviours: the input–process–output perspective , 2018 .

[15]  Mark Weiser,et al.  Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing , 1993, CACM.

[16]  John Riedl,et al.  GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews , 1994, CSCW '94.

[17]  Bernd Ludwig,et al.  Context relevance assessment and exploitation in mobile recommender systems , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[18]  Jaime Teevan,et al.  Understanding the importance of location, time, and people in mobile local search behavior , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[19]  Stefan Poslad,et al.  Personalized and Location-based Mobile Tourism Services , 2002 .

[20]  Damianos Gavalas,et al.  An innovative mobile electronic tourist guide application , 2009, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[21]  Dan Wang,et al.  Transforming the Travel Experience: The Use of Smartphones for Travel , 2013, ENTER.

[22]  Damianos Gavalas,et al.  A web-based pervasive recommendation system for mobile tourist guides , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[23]  Gerhard Friedrich,et al.  Recommender Systems - An Introduction , 2010 .

[24]  J. G. Adair,et al.  The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. , 1984 .

[25]  Pasquale Lops,et al.  Content-based Recommender Systems: State of the Art and Trends , 2011, Recommender Systems Handbook.

[26]  Linas Baltrunas,et al.  Towards Time-Dependant Recommendation based on Implicit Feedback , 2009 .

[27]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  Context-aware recommender systems , 2008, RecSys '08.

[28]  Mark Rosenstein,et al.  Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use , 1995, CHI '95.

[29]  Dimitrios Buhalis,et al.  SoCoMo Marketing for Travel and Tourism , 2014, ENTER.

[30]  Schubert Foo,et al.  TILES: classifying contextual information for mobile tourism applications , 2009, Aslib Proc..

[31]  David M. Pennock,et al.  Categories and Subject Descriptors , 2001 .