A locally optimal handoff algorithm for cellular communications

The design of handoff algorithms for cellular communication systems based on mobile signal strength measurements is considered. The design problem is posed as an optimization to obtain the best tradeoff between the expected number of service failures and expected number of handoffs, where a service failure is defined to be the event that the signal strength falls below a level required for satisfactory service to the subscriber. Based on dynamic programming arguments, an optimal solution is obtained, which, though impractical, can be used as a benchmark in the comparison of suboptimal schemes. A simple locally optimal handoff algorithm is derived from the optimal solution. Like the standard hysteresis algorithm, the locally optimal algorithm is characterized by a single threshold. A systematic method for the comparison of various handoff algorithms that are akin to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of radar detection is presented. Simulation results show that the locally optimal algorithm outperforms the hysteresis algorithm, especially in situations where accurate prediction of signal strength is possible. A straightforward technique for adapting the locally optimal algorithm to changing environments is suggested. That natural adaptability is the algorithm's principle advantage over current approaches.

[1]  E. A. Frech,et al.  Cellular models and hand-off criteria , 1989, IEEE 39th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[2]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[3]  S. Tekinay,et al.  Handover and channel assignment in mobile cellular networks , 1991, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  M. Gudmundson Correlation Model for Shadow Fading in Mobile Radio Systems , 1991 .

[5]  S.T.S. Chia,et al.  Handover criteria for city microcellular radio systems , 1990, 40th IEEE Conference on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  Prem Dassanayake Dynamic adjustment of propagation dependent parameters in handover algorithms , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC).

[7]  Björn Gudmundson,et al.  Handoff in microcellular based personal telephone systems , 1992 .

[8]  K. J. Bye Handover criteria and control in cellular and microcellular systems , 1989 .

[9]  M. Gudmundson Analysis of handover algorithms (microcellular radio) , 1991, [1991 Proceedings] 41st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[10]  A. Murase,et al.  Handover criterion for macro and microcellular systems , 1991, [1991 Proceedings] 41st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.

[11]  Armand M. Makowski Stochastic Control of Handoos in Cellular Networks , 1995 .

[12]  W. Lee,et al.  On the Estimation of the Second-Order Statistics of Log Normal Fading in Mobile Radio Environment , 1974, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[13]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation , 1994, Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering.

[14]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Analysis of handoff algorithms using both absolute and relative measurements , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC).

[15]  J. Holtzman,et al.  Analysis of handoff algorithms using both absolute and relative measurements , 1996 .

[16]  Andrea Goldsmith,et al.  Error statistics of real-time power measurements in cellular channels with multipath and shadowing , 1994 .

[17]  J. M. Holtzman,et al.  A model for analyzing handoff algorithms (cellular radio) , 1993 .

[18]  Armand M. Makowski,et al.  Stochastic Control of Handoffs in Cellular Networks , 1995, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[19]  Wayne E. Stark,et al.  A framework for optimal scheduling of handoffs in wireless networks , 1994, 1994 IEEE GLOBECOM. Communications: The Global Bridge.

[20]  R. Bellman Dynamic programming. , 1957, Science.

[21]  Alʹbert Nikolaevich Shiri︠a︡ev,et al.  Optimal stopping rules , 1977 .

[22]  M. D. Austin,et al.  Velocity adaptive handoff algorithms for microcellular systems , 1994 .