Effect of Gaze on Personal Space: A Japanese–German Cross-Cultural Study

In East Asian cultures, people maintain larger interpersonal distances than in European or American cultures. We investigated whether a preference for averted gaze might be responsible for this difference. Typically, when measuring interpersonal distance, participants are asked to maintain eye contact. This request might bias findings due to cultural differences in the interpretation of direct gaze. We had Japanese and German participants adjust preferred interpersonal distance in a standardized laboratory task, using averaged faces with straight-ahead or averted gaze direction. In line with previous findings, Japanese participants preferred overall larger interpersonal distances, and female–female dyads preferred the smallest distances. In contrast, there was no pervasive effect of gaze on interpersonal distance, as confirmed with Bayesian statistics. Thus, differences in the reactions to mutual gaze cannot explain the cultural preferences for interpersonal distance.

[1]  Morton Goldman,et al.  Personal Space Violations as A Function of Height , 1981 .

[2]  J. Zaichkowsky,et al.  Cultural Approaches to Negotiations: Understanding the Japanese , 1990 .

[3]  A. Schienle,et al.  Effects of personal space intrusion in affective contexts: an fMRI investigation with women suffering from borderline personality disorder. , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[4]  Ian S. Penton-Voak,et al.  The watching eyes effect in the Dictator Game: it's not how much you give, it's being seen to give something , 2013 .

[5]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  The dual function of social gaze , 2015, Cognition.

[6]  F. N. Willis Initial speaking distance as a function of the speakers’ relationship , 1966 .

[7]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[8]  Yuichi Iizuka,et al.  CROSS‐CULTURAL VARIATIONS IN RELATIONSHIP RULES , 1986 .

[9]  Jari K. Hietanen,et al.  Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach–avoidance motivational brain systems , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  In-Young Kim,et al.  Increased personal space of patients with schizophrenia in a virtual social environment , 2009, Psychiatry Research.

[11]  W. Strik,et al.  Keep at bay! – Abnormal personal space regulation as marker of paranoia in schizophrenia , 2016, European Psychiatry.

[12]  Ahmad M. Alghraibeh,et al.  Preferred Interpersonal Distances: A Global Comparison , 2017 .

[13]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  M. Baldassare,et al.  Cultural Variations in Personal Space , 1975 .

[15]  D I Perrett,et al.  Extracting Prototypical Facial Images from Exemplars , 1993, Perception.

[16]  Catherine Beaulieu,et al.  Intercultural Study of Personal Space: A Case Study , 2004 .

[17]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs , 2012 .

[18]  J. Hietanen,et al.  Attention to Eye Contact in the West and East: Autonomic Responses and Evaluative Ratings , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  O. Watson,et al.  Proxemic behavior : a cross-cultural study , 1970 .

[20]  F. Heider,et al.  Principles of topological psychology , 1936 .

[21]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  What Are the Odds? A Practical Guide to Computing and Reporting Bayes Factors , 2014, J. Probl. Solving.

[22]  J. Hietanen,et al.  Does it make a difference if I have an eye contact with you or with your picture? An ERP study. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[23]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[24]  H. Hecht,et al.  The effects of simulated vision impairments on the cone of gaze , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[25]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Sociocultural Conventions in Avatar-Mediated Nonverbal Communication: A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Virtual Proxemics , 2012 .

[26]  S. Heine,et al.  Approach—Avoidance Motivation and Information Processing: A Cross-Cultural Analysis , 2009, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[27]  J. Drury,et al.  Come together: two studies concerning the impact of group relations on personal space. , 2010, The British journal of social psychology.

[28]  A. Schienle,et al.  Neuronal correlates of personal space intrusion in violent offenders , 2016, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[29]  Peter Collett TRAINING ENGLISHMEN IN THE NON‐VERBAL BEHAVIOUR OF ARABS , 1971 .

[30]  Matthias S. Gobel,et al.  How Different Cultures Look at Faces Depends on the Interpersonal Context , 2017, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[31]  H. Rosenfeld,et al.  Influence of culture, language, and sex on conversational distance. , 1982 .

[32]  Yukiko Kikuchi,et al.  Cultural background modulates how we look at other persons’ gaze , 2013, International journal of behavioral development.

[33]  Xiaomin Yue,et al.  Neural Correlates of Personal Space Intrusion , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  M. Patterson Compensation in Nonverbal Immediacy Behaviors: A Review , 1973 .

[35]  M. Leibman The Effects of Sex and Race Norms On Personal Space , 1970 .

[36]  John R. Aiello,et al.  A further look at equilibrium theory: Visual interaction as a function of interpersonal distance , 1977 .

[37]  H. Hecht,et al.  Are you looking at me? Measuring the cone of gaze. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Shota Uono,et al.  Eye Contact Perception in the West and East: A Cross-Cultural Study , 2015, PloS one.

[39]  H. Hecht,et al.  Cross-ethnic assessment of body weight and height on the basis of faces , 2013 .

[40]  Matthias J. Wieser,et al.  Virtual Social Interactions in Social Anxiety - The Impact of Sex, Gaze, and Interpersonal Distance , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[41]  C. Ward,et al.  The Effects of Ethnicity and Culturally Congruent and Incongruent Nonverbal Behaviors on Interpersonal Attraction1 , 1993 .

[42]  Craig S. Hartley,et al.  Body Height, Position, and Sex as Determinants of Personal Space , 1974 .

[43]  J. Hietanen,et al.  The observer observed: frontal EEG asymmetry and autonomic responses differentiate between another person's direct and averted gaze when the face is seen live. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[44]  L. Hayduk Personal space: Where we now stand. , 1983 .

[45]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PERSONAL SPACE EXPECTATIONS AND THEIR VIOLATIONS , 1976 .

[46]  M. Patterson An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy. , 1976 .