Becoming researchers: a sociocultural perspective on assessment, learning and the construction of identity in a professional doctorate

The article reports on a small‐scale in‐depth research study investigating formative assessment enacted and theorised from a sociocultural perspective within a part‐time Professional Doctorate in Education (EdD) programme in an English university. Going beyond its conventional conceptualisation within psychological and motivational frameworks, formative assessment here encouraged students to view their learning as entailing the development of identities as researchers. The research adopted a case study approach, drawing upon participant observation, discourse analysis of online discussion forum and email feedback, and two series of student interviews. Although the practice of formative assessment remains problematic, students’ responses suggest the value of tutor feedback, including its ontological dimension. Given the wide‐ranging backgrounds of the learners who participated in this study, our findings suggest the relevance of a sociocultural view of formative assessment for supporting a more diverse doctoral student population. This leads us to argue for doctoral supervision to be conceptualised more firmly as a pedagogic relation in which formative assessment has a key role.

[1]  D. Boud,et al.  ‘Peer learning’ as pedagogic discourse for research education 1 , 2005 .

[2]  Clare Lee,et al.  Assessment for Learning- putting it into practice , 2003 .

[3]  Jannette Elwood,et al.  Formative assessment: possibilities, boundaries and limitations , 2006 .

[4]  J. Gee.  Opportunity to Learn: A language-based perspective on assessment , 2003 .

[5]  Louise Morley,et al.  Variations in Vivas: Quality and equality in British PhD assessments , 2002 .

[6]  M. Eraut,et al.  Informal learning in the workplace , 2004 .

[7]  N. Fairclough.  Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research , 2003 .

[8]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2001 .

[9]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[10]  D. Sadler.  Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[11]  J. Pryor,et al.  Developing Formative Assessment in the Classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory , 2001 .

[12]  Felicity Wikeley *,et al.  Pedagogical implications of working with doctoral students at a distance , 2004 .

[13]  L. Morley.  Interrogating Doctoral Assessment , 2004 .

[14]  Y. Engeström,et al.  The Discursive Construction of Collaborative Care , 2003 .

[15]  Peter Williams,et al.  Quality and Standards in Higher Education. , 2010 .

[16]  Bronwen Cowie,et al.  A Model of Formative Assessment in Science Education , 1999 .

[17]  D. Boud,et al.  Aligning assessment with long‐term learning , 2006 .

[18]  Mantz Yorke.  Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice , 2003 .

[19]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[20]  D. Scott,et al.  Professional Doctorates: Integrating Professional and Academic Knowledge , 2004 .

[21]  M. Eraut.  Early career learning at work and its implications for universities , 2005 .

[22]  P. Black,et al.  Redefining assessment? The first ten years of assessment in education , 2004 .

[23]  Barbara Crossouard,et al.  A socio‐cultural theorisation of formative assessment , 2008 .

[24]  Robin Usher,et al.  Telling a Story about Research and Research as Story-telling: Postmodern Approaches to Social Research , 2005 .

[25]  S. Gewirtz,et al.  Doctoral student supervision in a managerial climate , 2006 .

[26]  Ronald Barnett,et al.  Supercomplexity and the Curriculum , 2000 .

[27]  Ingólfur Gíslason,et al.  Making Social Science Matter. Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again , 2002 .

[28]  David Carless,et al.  Learning‐oriented assessment: principles and practice , 2006 .

[29]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Making Social Science Matter , 2001 .

[30]  E. Wenger,et al.  Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[31]  Lee S. Shulman,et al.  PREPARING STEWARDS OF THE DISCIPLINE , 2005 .

[32]  J. Pryor,et al.  Investigating Formative Assessment: Teaching, Learning and Assessment in the Classroom , 1998 .

[33]  B. Green,et al.  The PhD and the Autonomous Self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy , 2000 .

[34]  K. Ecclestone,et al.  ‘Learning Careers’ or ‘Assessment Careers’? The Impact of Assessment Systems on Learning , 2003 .

[35]  M. Cole.  A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition , 1993 .