Incentive Design in a Distributed Problem with Strategic Agents

In this paper, we consider a general distributed system with multiple agents who select and then implement actions in the system. The system has an operator with a centralized objective. The agents, on the other hand, are self-interested and strategic in the sense that each agent optimizes its own individual objective. The operator aims to mitigate this misalignment by designing an incentive scheme for the agents. The problem is difficult due to the cost functions of the agents being coupled, the objective of the operator not being social welfare, and the operator having no direct control over actions being implemented by the agents. This problem has been studied in many fields, particularly in mechanism design and cost allocation. However, mechanism design typically assumes that the objective of the operator is social welfare and the actions being implemented by the operator. On the other hand, cost allocation classically assumes that agents do not anticipate the effect of their actions on the incentive that they obtain. We remove these assumptions and present an incentive rule for this setup by bridging the gap between mechanism design and classical cost allocation. We analyze whether the proposed design satisfies various desirable properties such as social optimality, budget balance, participation constraint, and so on. We also analyze which of these properties can be satisfied if the assumptions on cost functions of the agents being private and the agents being anticipatory are relaxed.

[1]  Takashi Tanaka,et al.  Faithful Implementations of Distributed Algorithms and Control Laws , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems.

[2]  G. Arslan,et al.  Distributed Vehicle-Target Assignment Using Learning in Games , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[3]  P. Khargonekar,et al.  Cost Causation Based Allocations of Costs for Market Integration of Renewable Energy , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Yuan Zhang,et al.  Distributed multi-step power scheduling and cost allocation for cooperative microgrids , 2016, 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[5]  Aranya Chakrabortty,et al.  Game-Theoretic Multi-Agent Control and Network Cost Allocation Under Communication Constraints , 2016, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  J. Contreras,et al.  An Effective Transmission Network Expansion Cost Allocation Based on Game Theory , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Ming Jin,et al.  A Robust Utility Learning Framework via Inverse Optimization , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[8]  Adrian Vetta,et al.  Nash equilibria in competitive societies, with applications to facility location, traffic routing and auctions , 2002, The 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2002. Proceedings..

[9]  Takashi Tanaka,et al.  Incentivizing truth-telling in MPC-based load frequency control , 2016, 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[10]  Takashi Tanaka,et al.  A dynamic pivot mechanism with application to real time pricing in power systems , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[11]  A. G. Butkovskiĭ,et al.  Distributed control systems , 1969 .

[12]  Eilyan Bitar,et al.  Forward electricity markets with uncertain supply: Cost sharing and efficiency loss , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[13]  Jason R. Marden,et al.  Game Theory and Distributed Control , 2015 .

[14]  Afrooz Ansaripour Multi-leader-follower games of freight service pricing , 2018 .

[15]  H. Young Cost allocation : methods, principles, applications , 1985 .

[16]  Daniel Pérez Palomar,et al.  Demand-Side Management via Distributed Energy Generation and Storage Optimization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[17]  T. Başar,et al.  Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory , 1982 .

[18]  Jens Leth Hougaard,et al.  An Introduction to Allocation Rules , 2009 .

[19]  Claire J. Tomlin,et al.  DECENTRALIZED OPTIMIZATION VIA NASH BARGAINING , 2004 .

[20]  Kameshwar Poolla,et al.  A cooperative game for the realized profit of an aggregation of renewable energy producers , 2016, 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[21]  Kenji Hirata,et al.  A dynamic mechanism for LQG power networks with random type parameters and pricing delay , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[22]  J. Goodman Note on Existence and Uniqueness of Equilibrium Points for Concave N-Person Games , 1965 .