Forensic Environmental Geochemistry: differentiation of fuel-types, their sources and release time

Abstract During the evolution of organic and petroleum geochemistry, attention has focused mainly on investigation of either the gaseous or high molecular-weight hydrocarbons. Characterization of novel and environment-specific compounds has enriched our understanding of paleoenvironments, fossil biota and the alteration processes leading to the formation of energy resources. The “fingerprinting” methods developed for reconstructing geologic events can also be used with some modification for characterizing current processes affecting fugitive crude oil and its refined products that have impacted the environment and become an ecologic threat. In order to identify the source of the escaped hydrocarbon products, it is often essential to determine (a) what fuel types the hydrocarbons represent, (b) when the release(s) occurred and (c) how much of each fuel is mixed in the plume. These requirements can be accomplished by the combination of specialized analytical procedures used in standard contamination characterization with methodology developed in organic geochemistry, a combination we refer to as Forensic Environmental Geochemistry. The synopsis provided in this paper is concerned specifically with the light (naphtha) and middle distillate (kerosene-diesel) products in the C3–C25 hydrocarbon range. We demonstrate application of certain methods for differentiating various petroleum derivatives based on fuel-specific hydrocarbon patterns, some of which have not been described extensively in the organic geochemistry literature or applied for site investigations. A detailed description is provided for alkylcyclohexane distribution patterns in petroleum products and their use for differentiating various hydrocarbon fuels and solvents in environmentally altered samples. A case history illustrates application of the simulated distillation technique for estimating the relative proportion of individual fuel types in a binary mixture. We also describe how fuel additives can be used as tracers for estimating residence time in the environment and time of manufacture of gasoline. The methodology summarized here has been used in numerous environmental cases throughout the U.S.A. and has provided critical evidence in resolving legal disputes relating to the source of environmental contaminant releases and possible responsible parties.

[1]  Todd H. Wiedemeier,et al.  Approximation of Biodegradation Rate Constants for Monoaromatic Hydrocarbons (BTEX) in Ground Water , 1996 .

[2]  John J. McKetta,et al.  Petroleum Processing Handbook , 1992 .

[3]  J. Volkman,et al.  Biodegradation of aromatic hydrocarbons in crude oils from the Barrow Sub-basin of Western Australia , 1984 .

[4]  L. M. Gibbs,et al.  How Gasoline Has Changed , 1993 .

[5]  C. McAuliffe,et al.  Solubility in Water of Paraffin, Cycloparaffin, Olefin, Acetylene, Cycloolefin, and Aromatic Hydrocarbons1 , 1966 .

[6]  I. Kaplan,et al.  Patterns of Chemical Changes During Environmental Alteration of Hydrocarbon Fuels , 1996 .

[7]  R. Eganhouse,et al.  Crude oil in a shallow sand and gravel aquifer—II. Organic geochemistry , 1993 .

[8]  Eve Riser-Roberts,et al.  Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Sites , 1992 .

[9]  S. Silverman Influence of Petroleum Origin and Transformation on its Distribution and Redistribution in Sedimentary Rocks , 1971 .

[10]  L. B. Christensen,et al.  Method for Determining the Age of Diesel Oil Spills in the Soil , 1993 .

[11]  E. Ron,et al.  Bioremediation: Bioremediation of petroleum contamination , 1996 .

[12]  John R. Odermatt,et al.  Natural chromatographic separation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX compounds) in a gasoline contaminated ground water aquifer , 1994 .

[13]  Gregory S. Douglas,et al.  Environmental Stability of Selected Petroleum Hydrocarbon Source and Weathering Ratios , 1996 .

[14]  Stanton P. Nickerson Tetraethyl lead: A product of American research , 1954 .

[15]  Chris Sutton,et al.  Solubility of alkylbenzenes in distilled water and sea water at 25.0.deg. , 1975 .

[16]  L. M. Gibbs,et al.  Gasoline Additives - When and Why , 1990 .

[17]  E. E. Bray,et al.  Distribution of n-paraffins as a clue to recognition of source beds , 1961 .

[18]  Michael J. Whiticar,et al.  Biogenic methane formation in marine and freshwater environments: CO2 reduction vs. acetate fermentation—Isotope evidence , 1986 .

[19]  P. Reidy,et al.  Mobility and Degradation of Organic Contaminants in Subsurface Environments , 1992 .

[20]  K. J. Mccarthy,et al.  The use of hydrocarbon analyses for environmental assessment and remediation , 1992 .

[21]  R M Atlas,et al.  Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons: an environmental perspective , 1981, Microbiological reviews.

[22]  Y. Yang,et al.  Ground‐Water Contaminant Plume Differentiation and Source Determination Using BTEX Concentration Ratios , 1995 .

[23]  G. Baughman,et al.  Microbial bioconcentration of organic pollutants from aquatic systems -- a critical review. , 1981, Critical reviews in microbiology.

[24]  R. Eganhouse,et al.  Processes Affecting the Fate of Monoaromatic Hydrocarbons in an Aquifer Contaminated by Crude Oil , 1996 .

[25]  Nanne K. Hoekstra,et al.  Biotransformation of organics in soil columns and an infiltration area. , 1996 .

[26]  Martin Schoell,et al.  Multiple origins of methane in the Earth , 1988 .

[27]  M. Singer,et al.  Microbial metabolism of straight-chain and branched alkanes , 1984 .

[28]  Paul J. Squillace,et al.  Environmental Behavior and Fate of Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) , 1996 .

[29]  George E. Hoag,et al.  GASOLINE RESIDUAL SATURATION IN UNSATURATED UNIFORM AQUIFER MATERIALS , 1986 .