Cooperation between strands of practice: challenges and opportunities for the renewal of OR

Collaboration between OR groups following different ‘strands of practice’, namely adhering to different ways of conducting OR practice, is difficult. We demonstrate the existence of this problem in two contexts. Firstly, we found several different strands of practice within an independent, entrepreneurial OR firm. Though these strands had the potential to be highly complementary, their co-existence within one firm led to serious tensions and their potential synergy has not yet been realised. When the independent OR firm achieved successful renewal by transforming one of their strands of practice into a new approach to projects, this very success created a new set of competitive challenges. Secondly, an independent OR consulting firm working with a client's internal research group found that the latter's approach conflicted with its own, resulting in an unsuccessful project. We conclude that the ‘micro-level’ problems of collaboration between individual practitioners and between groups, though largely neglected in the OR literature, can be serious impediments to success and renewal of OR practice.

[1]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  The Natural Drift: What Happened to Operations Research? , 1993, Oper. Res..

[2]  Arthur M. Geoffrion,et al.  Forces, Trends, and Opportunities in MS/OR , 1992, Oper. Res..

[3]  P. van Beek,et al.  OR at work. , 1996 .

[4]  W. Wiegand : The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor , 1990 .

[5]  Howard Thomas,et al.  Strategic renaissance and business transformation , 1995 .

[6]  Frederick Winslow Taylor,et al.  科学管理原理=The principles of scientific management , 2014 .

[7]  Keith Rapley,et al.  The Changing Role of O.R. , 1980 .

[8]  S. Eilon,et al.  The Role of Management Science , 1980, The Journal of the Operational Research Society.

[9]  Robert Fildes,et al.  Success and survival of operational research groups—A review , 1997 .

[10]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[11]  D. Schoen The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[12]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  Beyond internal OR groups , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  Yehuda Shenhav,et al.  From Chaos to Systems: The Engineering Foundations of Organization Theory, 1879-1932. , 1995 .

[14]  Michael Norris,et al.  Operational Research and the Social Sciences , 1985 .

[15]  John Wilson The Practice of Operational Research , 1993 .

[16]  A. Abbott The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor , 1988 .

[17]  Willem J.A.M. Overmeer,et al.  Business integration in a learning organization: the role of management development , 1997 .

[18]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The rise and fall of strategic planning : reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners , 1994 .

[19]  Duncan A. Conway,et al.  Project Based Work Groups and the Organisation , 1989 .

[20]  Willem J. A. M. Overmeer Corporate inquiry and strategic learning : the role of surprises and improvisation in organizing major strategic changes , 1989 .

[21]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  STRANDS OF PRACTICE IN OR (THE PRACTITIONER S DILEMMA) , 1995 .

[22]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[23]  P. Keys,et al.  OR groups and the professionalisation of OR , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[24]  R. Lawrence,et al.  Operational Research and the Social Sciences. , 1966 .

[25]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  On the Nature of OR — Entering the Fray , 1996 .