Self-organization vs Watchmaker: stochastic gene expression and cell differentiation

Cell differentiation and organism development are traditionally described in deterministic terms of program and design, echoing a conventional clockwork perception of the cell on another scale. However, the current experimental reality of stochastic gene expression and cell plasticity is poorly consistent with the ideas of design, purpose and determinism, suggesting that the habit of classico-mechanistic interpretation of life phenomena may handicap our ability to adequately comprehend and model biological systems. An alternative conceptualization of cell differentiation and development is proposed where the developing organism is viewed as a dynamic self-organizing system of adaptive interacting agents. This alternative interpretation appears to be more consistent with the probabilistic nature of gene expression and the phenomena of cell plasticity, and is coterminous with the novel emerging image of the cell as a self-organizing molecular system. I suggest that stochasticity, as a principle of differentiation and adaptation, and self-organization, as a concept of emergence, have the potential to provide an interpretational framework that unites phenomena across different scales of biological organization, from molecules to societies.

[1]  M. Thattai,et al.  Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Neil D. Theise,et al.  Multi-Organ, Multi-Lineage Engraftment by a Single Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cell , 2001, Cell.

[3]  Hiroshi Kimura,et al.  The transcription cycle of RNA polymerase II in living cells , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  G. Nolan,et al.  Single cell assay of a transcription factor reveals a threshold in transcription activated by signals emanating from the T-cell antigen receptor. , 1990, Genes & development.

[5]  G. Crabtree,et al.  Cell signaling can direct either binary or graded transcriptional responses , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[6]  I. Ross,et al.  Transcription of individual genes in eukaryotic cells occurs randomly and infrequently , 1994, Immunology and cell biology.

[7]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Dimeric ligands define a role for transcriptional activation domains in reinitiation , 1996, Nature.

[8]  François Nédélec,et al.  Self-organisation and forces in the microtubule cytoskeleton. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[9]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Protein folding and misfolding: a paradigm of self–assembly and regulation in complex biological systems , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[11]  Kazunari Miyamichi,et al.  Negative Feedback Regulation Ensures the One Receptor-One Olfactory Neuron Rule in Mouse , 2003, Science.

[12]  D. Hall,et al.  Stochastic and genetic factors influence tissue-specific decline in ageing C. elegans , 2002, Nature.

[13]  A. Páldi Stochastic gene expression during cell differentiation: order from disorder? , 2003, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[14]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  A novel dynamic model of hematopoietic stem cell organization based on the concept of within-tissue plasticity. , 2002, Experimental hematology.

[15]  A. Houtsmuller,et al.  Rapid switching of TFIIH between RNA polymerase I and II transcription and DNA repair in vivo. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[16]  R. Poulsom,et al.  Cell differentiation: Hepatocytes from non-hepatic adult stem cells , 2000, Nature.

[17]  H. Weintraub,et al.  Formation of stable transcription complexes as assayed by analysis of individual templates. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  I. Wilmut,et al.  Cell plasticity: Flexible arrangement , 2003, Nature.

[19]  Julian R. E. Davis,et al.  Dynamic changes in prolactin promoter activation in individual living lactotrophic cells. , 1998, Endocrinology.

[20]  Wim Vermeulen,et al.  Nuclear dynamics of RAD52 group homologous recombination proteins in response to DNA damage , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[21]  R. van Driel,et al.  Nuclear distribution of transcription factors in relation to sites of transcription and RNA polymerase II. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[22]  F. Gage,et al.  Cell fusion-independent differentiation of neural stem cells to the endothelial lineage , 2004, Nature.

[23]  H. Blau,et al.  From marrow to brain: expression of neuronal phenotypes in adult mice. , 2000, Science.

[24]  M. Groudine,et al.  Enhancers increase the probability but not the level of gene expression. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Tissue Stem Cells: Definition, Plasticity, Heterogeneity, Self-Organization and Models – A Conceptual Approach , 2002, Cells Tissues Organs.

[26]  T. Misteli,et al.  In Vivo Dynamics of Swi6 in Yeast: Evidence for a Stochastic Model of Heterochromatin , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[27]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Stochastic gene expression as a many-body problem , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  D. Hume,et al.  Probability in transcriptional regulation and its implications for leukocyte differentiation and inducible gene expression. , 2000, Blood.

[29]  J. Concordet,et al.  Illegitimate transcription: transcription of any gene in any cell type. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Benoit Morel,et al.  Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: the Dynamics of Organizations As Adaptive and Evolving Systems , 1999 .

[31]  T. Misteli The concept of self-organization in cellular architecture , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  A. Vescovi,et al.  Turning brain into blood: a hematopoietic fate adopted by adult neural stem cells in vivo. , 1999, Science.

[33]  D. Jackson,et al.  Active RNA polymerases are localized within discrete transcription "factories' in human nuclei. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[34]  John S. Van Arnam,et al.  Lack of a Fusion Requirement for Development of Bone Marrow-Derived Epithelia , 2004, Science.

[35]  John B Rundle,et al.  Self-organized complexity in the physical, biological, and social sciences , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  H. Blau,et al.  Transcriptional control: rheostat converted to on/off switch. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[37]  J. Jami,et al.  Biallelic transcription of Igf2 and H19 in individual cells suggests a post-transcriptional contribution to genomic imprinting , 1999, Current Biology.

[38]  J. Kupiec A Darwinian theory for the origin of cellular differentiation , 1997, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[39]  R. Sandaltzopoulos,et al.  Heat Shock Factor Increases the Reinitiation Rate from Potentiated Chromatin Templates , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[40]  H. Blau,et al.  Graded transcriptional response to different concentrations of a single transactivator. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  C S Robinson,et al.  Transcription occurs in pulses in muscle fibers. , 1998, Genes & development.

[42]  Xin Wang,et al.  Purified hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo , 2000, Nature Medicine.

[43]  M. Braddock,et al.  Real-time analysis of the transcriptional regulation of HIV and hCMV promoters in single mammalian cells. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[44]  T. Misteli,et al.  A Kinetic Framework for a Mammalian RNA Polymerase in Vivo , 2002, Science.

[45]  T. Curran,et al.  Mouse embryos cloned from brain tumors. , 2003, Cancer research.

[46]  J. Fewell Social Insect Networks , 2003, Science.

[47]  M. Ko,et al.  The dose dependence of glucocorticoid‐inducible gene expression results from changes in the number of transcriptionally active templates. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[48]  S. Fiering,et al.  To be or not to be active: the stochastic nature of enhancer action. , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[49]  D. Krause,et al.  Toward a new paradigm of cell plasticity , 2002, Leukemia.

[50]  X. Tian,et al.  Reprogramming of epigenetic inheritance by somatic cell nuclear transfer. , 2004, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[51]  Robert H Singer,et al.  Single-Cell Gene Expression Profiling , 2002, Science.

[52]  V. Kuznetsov,et al.  General statistics of stochastic process of gene expression in eukaryotic cells. , 2002, Genetics.

[53]  M. Ogawa,et al.  Differentiation and proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells. , 1993, Blood.

[54]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Dynamic binding of histone H1 to chromatin in living cells , 2000, Nature.

[55]  F S Fay,et al.  Visualization of single RNA transcripts in situ. , 1998, Science.

[56]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[57]  S. Tapscott,et al.  Modeling stochastic gene expression: implications for haploinsufficiency. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.