Introduction of Model Predictive Control for the System Optimization of a Proportional Directional Control Valve

During a model-based system optimization of a proportional directional control valve, the system performance is simulated for a wide range of different design parameter sets. The behavior of the model, which is used to evaluate the system performance, changes whenever the optimization algorithm provides new parameter values. The closed-loop control response of a proportional valve is used as the metric of the system performance. Thus, to avoid evaluating the robustness of the valve controller, a new controller design is required whenever a variation of the plant parameters is carried out. The native controller of a proportional directional control valve is a nonlinear PID controller with numerous coupled parameters. This controller design requires a complex evolutionary multi-objective parameter optimization. This contribution introduces the model predictive control (MPC) in the context of a fully automated model-based system optimization of a proportional directional control valve. Since the plant is known exactly for every design variation, the plant model becomes a part of the control concept. By updating the prediction model, the controller exhibits a design adaptive characteristic. Due to the inherent system knowledge of the MPC setup within the model-based system optimization, the number of free controller parameters decreases significantly. These additional free parameters, like the weights of the user-defined objective function, can be included easily into the design optimization vector enabling a single holistic system optimization procedure.

[1]  David Q. Mayne,et al.  Correction to "Constrained model predictive control: stability and optimality" , 2001, Autom..

[2]  Jay H. Lee,et al.  Model predictive control: past, present and future , 1999 .

[3]  Torsten Bertram,et al.  Model predictive trajectory set control for a proportional directional control valve , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA).

[4]  Torsten Bertram,et al.  Cascaded Evolutionary Multi-Objective System Optimization for a Proportional Directional Control Valve , 2018, 2018 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM).

[5]  Torsten Bertram,et al.  Model Predictive Trajectory Set Control with Adaptive Input Domain Discretization , 2018, 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC).

[6]  F. Hoffmann,et al.  Evolutionary hardware-in-the-loop optimization of a controller for cascaded hydraulic valves , 2007, 2007 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics.

[7]  Stefan Menzel,et al.  A cascaded evolutionary multi-objective optimization for solving the unbiased universal electric motor family problem , 2014, 2014 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC).

[8]  Jukka Kaukonen,et al.  Coupled FEM-Control Simulation in the Analysis of Electrical Machines and Converters , 2006, 2006 12th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference.

[9]  Torsten Bertram,et al.  Holistic Approach to the System Optimization of a Proportional Valve , 2018 .

[10]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[11]  J. Amerongen Mechatronic design , 2003 .

[12]  Kleanthis Thramboulidis,et al.  Challenges in the development of Mechatronic systems: The Mechatronic Component , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation.