Design of Reliability Acceptance Sampling Plans Based on Accelerated Degradation Tests

Reliability acceptance sampling plans (RASPs) are used to determine the acceptability of a collection of units (e.g., a lot) with respect to lifetime. Most of the previous works on RASPs assume that life tests are conducted at the use or accelerated conditions. For high-reliability units, however, adopting life tests may easily turn out to be impractical in terms of the sample size and the amount of test time required, even if accelerated life tests are adopted. In such cases, it may be advisable to adopt accelerated degradation tests (ADTs) in which performance characteristics degraded over time, instead of failure times, arc observed under accelerated stress conditions. In this article, RASPs are developed assuming that degradation tests are conducted at the use and two accelerated stress conditions. Optimal test conditions (stress levels and test durations) and the proportion of test units allocated to each condition are determined such that the asymptotic variance of the test statistic is minimized. Then, the sample size and the lot acceptability constant are determined such that the producer and the consumer risks are satisfied. Procedures for designing an RASP and sensitivity analyses are also illustrated with an example.

[1]  Gordon Johnston,et al.  Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data , 2003, Technometrics.

[2]  Luis A. Escobar,et al.  A Review of Recent Research and Current Issues in Accelerated Testing , 1993 .

[3]  Gerald J. Lieberman,et al.  Sampling Plans for Inspection by Variables , 1955 .

[4]  K. Fertig,et al.  Life-Test Sampling Plans for Two-Parameter Weibull Populations , 1980 .

[5]  M. B. Carey,et al.  Reliability assessment based on accelerated degradation: a case study , 1991 .

[6]  William Q. Meeker,et al.  Statistical tools for the rapid development and evaluation of high-reliability products , 1995 .

[7]  H. Schneider Failure-censored variables-sampling plans for lognormal and Weibull distributions , 1989 .

[8]  Bong-Jin Yum,et al.  OPTIMAL DESIGN OF ACCELERATED DEGRADATION TESTS FOR ESTIMATING MEAN LIFETIME AT THE USE CONDITION , 1997 .

[9]  C. Joseph Lu,et al.  Using Degradation Measures to Estimate a Time-to-Failure Distribution , 1993 .

[10]  William Q. Meeker,et al.  A COMPARISON OF DEGRADATION AND FAILURE-TIME ANALYSIS METHODS FOR ESTIMATING A TIME-TO-FAILURE DISTRIBUTION , 1996 .

[11]  Failure-Free Period Life Tests , 1985 .

[12]  G. Nahler,et al.  : Accelerated testing , 1999 .

[13]  Bong-Jin Yum,et al.  Development of r,T hybrid sampling plans for exponential lifetime distributions , 1996 .

[14]  M. Boulanger,et al.  Experimental Design for a Class of Accelerated Degradation Tests , 1994 .

[15]  Bong-Jin Yum,et al.  Comparisons of Exponential Life Test Plans with Intermittent Inspections , 2000 .

[16]  B. Epstein Truncated Life Tests in the Exponential Case , 1954 .

[17]  Bong-Jin Yum,et al.  Development of life-test sampling plans for exponential distributions based on accelerated life testing , 1990 .