A dynamic bioeconomic analysis of mountain pine beetle epidemics

In this paper, we develop a bioeconomic model of timber harvesting that includes dynamic interactions between mountain pine beetle (MPB) and a lodgepole pine forest with a disaggregated size structure. The model is used to investigate the consequences of alternative public management strategies on forest dynamics in the presence of MPB outbreaks. Management practices similar to those commonly practiced are shown to increase the severity of MPB cycles. Centrally coordinated forest management can eliminate MPB cycles and lessen the impacts of MPB outbreaks with only small reductions in the long-run stock of adult trees.

[1]  D. Ragozin,et al.  Harvest policies and nonmarket valuation in a predator -- prey system , 1985 .

[2]  P. Samuelson Economics of Forestry in an Evolving Society , 1976 .

[3]  A. Carroll,et al.  The biology and epidemiology of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests. , 2006 .

[4]  Bo Jellesmark Thorsen,et al.  Optimal stand management with endogenous risk of sudden destruction , 1998 .

[5]  W. Kurz,et al.  Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change , 2008, Nature.

[6]  A. Carroll,et al.  Disturbance, Forest Age, and Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreak Dynamics in BC: A Historical Perspective , 2004 .

[7]  Beetles, trees, and people: Regional economic impact sensitivity and policy considerations related to the mountain pine beetle infestation in British Columbia, Canada , 2007 .

[8]  U. Regev,et al.  Biological interactions and environmental effects in the economics of pest control , 1975 .

[9]  T. Holmes Price and Welfare Effects of Catastrophic Forest Damage from Southern Pine Beetle Epidemics , 1991 .

[10]  Harvesting and Conversation in a Predator-Prey System , 2001 .

[11]  Robert A. Miller,et al.  A stochastic analysis of the tree paradigm , 1983 .

[12]  S. Matsuoka,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[13]  A. Berryman,et al.  The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) , 1983 .

[14]  Yngve Willassen,et al.  The Stochastic Rotation Problem - A Generalization of faustmann's Formula to Stochastic Forest Growth , 1998 .

[15]  J. List,et al.  Optimal Institutional Arrangements for Transboundary Pollutants in a Second-Best World: Evidence from a Differential Game with Asymmetric Players , 2000 .

[16]  R. Hannesson Optimal harvesting of ecologically interdependent fish species , 1983 .

[17]  J. Bergh,et al.  Harvesting and conservation in a predator-prey system , 2005 .

[18]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources. , 1993 .

[19]  T. Fahey,et al.  Changes in Product Recovery Between Live and Dead Lodgepole Pine: A Compendium , 2018 .

[20]  C. S. Holling The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .

[21]  Martin D. Smith,et al.  Optimal Fisheries Management in the Presence of an Endangered Predator and Harvestable Prey , 2001 .

[22]  J. Logan,et al.  Assessment and response to bark beetle outbreaks in the Rocky Mountain area. Report to Congress from Forest Health Protection Washington Office, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture , 2000 .

[23]  William J. Reed,et al.  Protecting a forest against fire: optimal protection patterns and harvest policies , 1987 .

[24]  E. Johnson,et al.  Plant Disturbance Ecology: The Process and the Response , 2007 .

[25]  B. Ohlin Till frågan om skogarnas omloppstid , 1921 .

[26]  S. Lenhart,et al.  Controlling Forest Damage by Dispersive Beaver Populations: Centralized Optimal Management Strategy. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[27]  Jeffrey L. Arthur,et al.  Spatial-Endogenous Fire Risk and Efficient Fuel Management and Timber Harvest , 2008, Land Economics.

[28]  Vernon L. Smith,et al.  On Models of Commercial Fishing , 1969, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  Darwin C. Hall,et al.  On the Timing and Application of Pesticides , 1973 .

[30]  Pierre N. V. Tu,et al.  A generalized predator- prey model: Uncertainty and management , 1992 .

[31]  J. Régnière,et al.  Assessing the Impacts of Global Warming on Forest Pest Dynamics , 2022 .

[32]  Jean-Daniel Saphores,et al.  Harvesting a renewable resource under uncertainty , 2003 .

[33]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Optimising the management of Pinus nigra Arn. stands under endogenous risk of fire in Catalonia , 2008 .

[34]  J. Hicke,et al.  Cross-scale Drivers of Natural Disturbances Prone to Anthropogenic Amplification: The Dynamics of Bark Beetle Eruptions , 2008 .

[35]  R. G. Mitchell,et al.  Colonization Patterns of the Mountain Pine Beetle in Thinned and Unthinned Lodgepole Pine Stands , 1993 .

[36]  P. Koch Lodgepole Pine in North America , 1996 .

[37]  J. Wilen,et al.  Optimal recovery paths for perturbations of trophic level bioeconomic systems , 1986 .

[38]  Gene D. Amman,et al.  Mountain pine beetle dynamics in lodgepole pine forests. Part II: Population dynamics. , 1983 .

[39]  D. Finnoff,et al.  Protecting an Endangered Species While Harvesting Its Prey in a General Equilibrium Ecosystem Model , 2003, Land Economics.

[40]  William J. Reed,et al.  Techniques for assessing the effects of pest hazards on long-run timber supply , 1987 .

[41]  G. D. Amman,et al.  Susceptibility of lodgepole pine to infestation by mountain pine beetles following partial cutting of stands , 1988 .

[42]  James A. Powell,et al.  A NOVEL METHOD OF FITTING SPATIO‐TEMPORAL MODELS TO DATA, WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE DYNAMICS OF MOUNTAIN PINE BEETLES , 2008 .

[43]  J. Tschirhart,et al.  Ecosystems, externalities, and economies , 1992, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[44]  B. Dennis,et al.  Evolution of Optimal Group Attack, with Particular Reference to Bark Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) , 1985 .

[45]  J. Logan,et al.  Ecological consequences of climate change altered forest insect disturbanceregimes , 2004 .

[46]  Justin Heavilin,et al.  16 – Dynamics of Mountain Pine Beetle Outbreaks , 2007 .

[47]  R. H. Silversides,et al.  Dispersal of released mountain pine beetles under the canopy of a mature lodgepole pine stand , 1992 .

[48]  J. Régnière,et al.  Effect of climate change on range expansion by the mountain pine beetle in British Columbia , 2003 .

[49]  B. Hawkes,et al.  Lodgepole pine forest age class dynamics and susceptibility to mountain pine beetle attack , 2005 .

[50]  J. Yoder,et al.  Playing with Fire: Endogenous Risk in Resource Management , 2004 .