Soft-tissue and alignment correction: the use of smart trials in total knee replacement.

Total knee replacement (TKR) smart tibial trials have load-bearing sensors which will show quantitative compartment pressure values and femoral-tibial tracking patterns. Without smart trials, surgeons rely on feel and visual estimation of imbalance to determine if the knee is optimally balanced. Corrective soft-tissue releases are performed with minimal feedback as to what and how much should be released. The smart tibial trials demonstrate graphically where and how much imbalance is present, so that incremental releases can be performed. The smart tibial trials now also incorporate accelerometers which demonstrate the axial alignment. This now allows the surgeon the option to perform a slight recut of the tibia or femur to provide soft-tissue balance without performing soft-tissue releases. Using a smart tibial trial to assist with soft-tissue releases or bone re-cuts, improved patient outcomes have been demonstrated at one year in a multicentre study of 135 patients (135 knees).

[1]  M. Roche,et al.  Primary TKA Patients with Quantifiably Balanced Soft-Tissue Achieve Significant Clinical Gains Sooner than Unbalanced Patients , 2014, Advances in orthopedics.

[2]  M. Roche,et al.  A new method for defining balance: promising short-term clinical outcomes of sensor-guided TKA. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  P. Walker,et al.  Effects of surgical variables in balancing of total knee replacements using an instrumented tibial trial. , 2014, The Knee.

[4]  K. Sloan,et al.  Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  J. Yang,et al.  Clinical and radiologic outcomes of contemporary 3 techniques of TKA. , 2010, Orthopedics.

[6]  R. Bitsch,et al.  Are patients' expectations of hip and knee arthroplasty fulfilled? A prospective study of 130 patients. , 2010, Orthopedics.

[7]  Daniel J Berry,et al.  The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Long-term Survivorship and Failure Modes of 1000 Cemented Condylar Total Knee Arthroplasties , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Karon F Cook,et al.  The John Insall Award: Patient Expectations Affect Satisfaction with Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  M. C. de Waal Malefijt,et al.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  R. Dickstein,et al.  Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Elderly: Patients’ Self-Appraisal 6 and 12 Months Postoperatively , 1998, Gerontology.

[11]  L. Dorr,et al.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.