The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment.

Research has shown that children repeat high-probability phoneme sequences more accurately than low-probability ones. This effect attenuates with age, and its decrease is predicted by developmental changes in the size of the lexicon (J. Edwards, M. E. Beckman, & B. Munson, 2004; B. Munson, 2001; B. Munson, J. Edwards, & M. Beckman, 2005). This study expands on these findings by examining relationships between vocabulary size and repetition accuracy of nonwords varying in phonotactic probability by 16 children with specific language impairment (SLI), 16 chronological-age-matched (CA) peers with typical speech and language development, and 16 younger children matched with the children with SLI on vocabulary size (VS). As in previous research, children with SLI repeated nonwords less accurately than did CA children. The children with SLI and the VS children showed similar levels of nonword repetition accuracy. Phonotactic probability affected repetition accuracy more for children with SLI and VS children than for CA children. Regression analyses showed that measures of vocabulary size were the best predictor of the difference in repetition accuracy between high- and low-probability sequences. Analyses by items showed that measures of phonotactic probability were stronger predictors of repetition accuracy than judgments of wordlikeness. Taken together, the results support research demonstrating that vocabulary size mediates the influence of phonotactic probability on nonword repetition, perhaps due to its influence on the ongoing refinement of phonological categories.

[1]  T. Campbell,et al.  Lexical influences on nonword repetition , 1995, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[2]  B. Munson,et al.  Phonological pattern frequency and speech production in adults and children. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  B A Lewis,et al.  Residual effects of preschool phonology disorders in grade school, adolescence, and adulthood. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  J. Windsor,et al.  General slowing in language impairment: methodological considerations in testing the hypothesis. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  J. Edwards,et al.  Nonword repetitions of children with specific language impairment: Exploration of some explanations for their inaccuracies , 1998, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[6]  Mary E. Beckman,et al.  Phonetic Interpretation Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Speech perception, well-formedness and the statistics of the lexicon , 2004 .

[7]  E. Bates,et al.  Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis , 1994, Journal of Child Language.

[8]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Books Recieved , 2022, CL.

[9]  M. Beckman,et al.  The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  Benjamin Munson,et al.  Relationships between nonword repetition accuracy and other measures of linguistic development in children with phonological disorders. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  T. Campbell,et al.  Nonword repetition and child language impairment. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  Cynthia L Fisher,et al.  Implicit Memory Support for Language Acquisition , 2001 .

[13]  J. Windsor,et al.  The search for common ground: Part II. Nonlinguistic performance by linguistically diverse learners. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  G. Conti-Ramsden.  Processing and linguistic markers in young children with specific language impairment (SLI). , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  S. Gathercole.  Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the nonwords , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[16]  G. Conti-Ramsden,et al.  Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[17]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection? ☆ , 1990 .

[18]  J. Windsor,et al.  The search for common ground: Part I. Lexical performance by linguistically diverse learners. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[19]  J. Metsala,et al.  Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: precursors to p , 1998 .

[20]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Perception of Wordlikeness: Effects of Segment Probability and Length on the Processing of Nonwords. , 2000, Journal of memory and language.

[21]  C. Frankish,et al.  Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  M L Rice,et al.  Quick Incidental Learning (QUIL) of words by school-age children with and without SLI. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[23]  Irving Lorge,et al.  Columbia mental maturity scale , 1954 .

[24]  C Donlan,et al.  Nonword repetition as a behavioural marker for inherited language impairment: evidence from a twin study. , 1996, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[25]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The role of phonological memory in vocabulary acquisition: A study of young children learning new names , 1990 .

[26]  J B Tomblin,et al.  Nonword repetition performance in school-age children with and without language impairment. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[27]  Catherine L. Rogers,et al.  Final consonant discrimination in children: effects of phonological disorder, vocabulary size, and articulatory accuracy. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[28]  G. Conti-Ramsden,et al.  Non-word repetition and language development in children with specific language impairment (SLI). , 2001, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[29]  J. Arena,et al.  Expressive one-word picture vocabulary test , 1984 .

[30]  C. Dollaghan,et al.  Fast mapping in normal and language-impaired children. , 1987, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[31]  E. Bates,et al.  2 ON THE INSEPARABILITY OF GRAMMAR AND THE LEXICON : EVIDENCE FROM ACQUISITION , APHASIA AND REAL-TIME PROCESSING , 1997 .

[32]  Todd M. Bailey,et al.  Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? , 2001 .

[33]  Cleborne D. Maddux,et al.  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-III) , 1999 .

[34]  P. Luce,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .

[35]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study , 1989 .

[36]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception, word recognition and the structure of the lexicon , 1985, Speech Commun..

[37]  H. Storkel.  Restructuring of similarity neighbourhoods in the developing mental lexicon , 2002, Journal of Child Language.

[38]  N. Gardner,et al.  Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test , 1981 .

[39]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Words, nonwords, and phonological processes: Some comments on Gathercole, Willis, Emslie, and Baddeley , 1991, Applied Psycholinguistics.