Validation of a Torso-Mounted Accelerometer for Measures of Vertical Oscillation and Ground Contact Time During Treadmill Running.

The purpose of this study was to validate measures of vertical oscillation (VO) and ground contact time (GCT) derived from a commercially-available, torso-mounted accelerometer compared with single marker kinematics and kinetic ground reaction force (GRF) data. Twenty-two semi-elite runners ran on an instrumented treadmill while GRF data (1000 Hz) and three-dimensional kinematics (200 Hz) were collected for 60 s across 5 different running speeds ranging from 2.7 to 3.9 m/s. Measurement agreement was assessed by Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement and by concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The accelerometer had excellent CCC agreement (> 0.97) with marker kinematics, but only moderate agreement, and overestimated measures between 16.27 mm to 17.56 mm compared with GRF VO measures. The GCT measures from the accelerometer had very good CCC agreement with GRF data, with less than 6 ms of mean bias at higher speeds. These results indicate a torso-mounted accelerometer provides valid and accurate measures of torso-segment VO, but both a marker placed on the torso and the accelerometer yield systematic overestimations of center of mass VO. Measures of GCT from the accelerometer are valid when compared with GRF data, particularly at faster running speeds.

[1]  K. R. Williams,et al.  Relationship between distance running mechanics, running economy, and performance. , 1987, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  R. Moe-Nilssen.  Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometry during standing and walking. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  B M Nigg,et al.  The influence of running velocity and midsole hardness on external impact forces in heel-toe running. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Daniel Arthur James,et al.  Use of accelerometers for detecting foot-ground contact time during running , 2006, SPIE Micro + Nano Materials, Devices, and Applications.

[5]  J S Higginson,et al.  Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[6]  Angelo M. Sabatini,et al.  Assessment of walking features from foot inertial sensing , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Ugo Della Croce,et al.  Comparison of three methods for estimating vertical displacement of center of mass during level walking in patients , 1996 .

[8]  Kjartan Halvorsen,et al.  Measurements of vertical displacement in running, a methodological comparison. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[9]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[10]  Robert F Chapman,et al.  Ground contact time as an indicator of metabolic cost in elite distance runners. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[12]  J. Allum,et al.  Gait event detection using linear accelerometers or angular velocity transducers in able-bodied and spinal-cord injured individuals. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[13]  E. Gutierrez-Farewik,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of two common methods to measure center of mass displacement in three dimensions during gait. , 2006, Human movement science.

[14]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Footswitch system for measurement of the temporal parameters of gait. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Reed Ferber,et al.  Normative and critical criteria for iliotibial band and iliopsoas muscle flexibility. , 2010, Journal of athletic training.

[16]  Andrew H Hansen,et al.  A simple method for determination of gait events. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Reed Ferber,et al.  Predicting timing of foot strike during running, independent of striking technique, using principal component analysis of joint angles. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  A. Kuo,et al.  Comparison of kinematic and kinetic methods for computing the vertical motion of the body center of mass during walking. , 2004, Human movement science.

[19]  Vincent Gouttebarge,et al.  Reproducibility and Validity of the Myotest for Measuring Step Frequency and Ground Contact Time in Recreational Runners , 2015, Journal of human kinetics.

[20]  R. Moe-Nilssen,et al.  A new method for evaluating motor control in gait under real-life environmental conditions. Part 1: The instrument. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  R. Di Michele,et al.  The concurrent effects of strike pattern and ground-contact time on running economy. , 2014, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[22]  Rafael C González,et al.  Real-time gait event detection for normal subjects from lower trunk accelerations. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[23]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[24]  L. Lin,et al.  A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. , 1989, Biometrics.

[25]  P. Komi,et al.  Biomechanical factors affecting running economy. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.