Disease Reactivation After Cessation of Disease-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Background and Objectives To evaluate the rate of return of disease activity after cessation of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapy. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study from 2 large observational MS registries: MSBase and OFSEP. Patients with relapsing-remitting MS who had ceased a disease-modifying therapy and were followed up for the subsequent 12 months were included in the analysis. The primary study outcome was annualized relapse rate in the 12 months after disease-modifying therapy discontinuation stratified by patients who did, and did not, commence a subsequent therapy. The secondary endpoint was the predictors of first relapse and disability accumulation after treatment discontinuation. Results A total of 14,213 patients, with 18,029 eligible treatment discontinuation epochs, were identified for 7 therapies. Annualized rates of relapse (ARRs) started to increase 2 months after natalizumab cessation (month 2-4 ARR 0.47, 95% CI 0.43–0.51). Commencement of a subsequent therapy within 2-4 months reduced the magnitude of disease reactivation (mean ARR difference: 0.15, 0.08–0.22). After discontinuation of fingolimod, rates of relapse increased overall (month 1–2 ARR: 0.80, 0.70–0.89) and stabilized faster in patients who started a new therapy within 1-2 months (mean ARR difference: 0.14, −0.01 to 0.29). The magnitude of disease reactivation for other therapies was low but reduced further by commencement of another treatment 1–10 months after treatment discontinuation. Predictors of relapse were a higher relapse rate in the year before cessation, female sex, younger age, and higher EDSS score. Commencement of a subsequent therapy reduced both the risk of relapse (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.72–0.81) and disability accumulation (0.73, 0.65–0.80). Discussion The rate of disease reactivation after treatment cessation differs among MS treatments, with the peaks of relapse activity ranging from 1 to 10 months in untreated cohorts that discontinued different therapies. These results suggest that untreated intervals should be minimized after stopping antitrafficking therapies (natalizumab and fingolimod). Classification of Evidence This study provides Class III that disease reactivation occurs within months of discontinuation of MS disease-modifying therapies. The risk of disease activity is reduced by commencement of a subsequent therapy.

[1]  T. Derfuss,et al.  Lymphocyte recovery after fingolimod discontinuation in patients with MS , 2020, Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation.

[2]  D. Arnold,et al.  Contribution of Relapse-Independent Progression vs Relapse-Associated Worsening to Overall Confirmed Disability Accumulation in Typical Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in a Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials , 2020, JAMA neurology.

[3]  K. Anja European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis , 2019, Kinder- und Jugendmedizin.

[4]  J. Lechner-Scott,et al.  Clinical and therapeutic predictors of disease outcomes in AQP4-IgG+ neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. , 2019, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[5]  C. Tornatore,et al.  Fingolimod Rebound: A Review of the Clinical Experience and Management Considerations , 2019, Neurology and Therapy.

[6]  H. Butzkueven,et al.  The MSBase registry: Informing clinical practice , 2019, Multiple sclerosis.

[7]  L. Kappos,et al.  Comparison of fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis , 2019, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[8]  R. Kinkel,et al.  Post-natalizumab disease reactivation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders.

[9]  F. Guillemin,et al.  Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP): A unique multimodal nationwide MS registry in France , 2018, Multiple sclerosis.

[10]  V. Meca-Lallana,et al.  Tumefactive multiple sclerosis lesions associated with fingolimod treatment: Report of 5 cases. , 2018, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[11]  L. Kappos,et al.  Predictors of relapse and disability progression in MS patients who discontinue disease-modifying therapy , 2018, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[12]  R. Grasso,et al.  Clinical activity after fingolimod cessation: disease reactivation or rebound? , 2018, European journal of neurology.

[13]  M. Reindl,et al.  Discontinuation of disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis – Clinical outcome and prognostic factors , 2017, Multiple sclerosis.

[14]  F. Lublin,et al.  The 'Field Hypothesis': rebound activity after stopping disease-modifying therapies. , 2017, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[15]  T. Friede,et al.  Immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: efficacy and predictors of response , 2017, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[16]  M. Tsolaki,et al.  Data quality evaluation for observational multiple sclerosis registries , 2017, Multiple sclerosis.

[17]  M. Clanet,et al.  Risk of relapse after natalizumab withdrawal , 2016, Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation.

[18]  E. Waubant,et al.  Rebound Syndrome in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis After Cessation of Fingolimod Treatment. , 2016, JAMA neurology.

[19]  H. Butzkueven,et al.  Observational data: Understanding the real MS world , 2016, Multiple sclerosis.

[20]  L. Kappos,et al.  The effect of oral immunomodulatory therapy on treatment uptake and persistence in multiple sclerosis , 2016, Multiple sclerosis.

[21]  Pierre Grammond,et al.  Defining reliable disability outcomes in multiple sclerosis. , 2015, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  D. Centonze,et al.  Natalizumab discontinuation in patients with multiple sclerosis: Profiling risk and benefits at therapeutic crossroads , 2015, Multiple sclerosis.

[23]  R. Wilson MS disease activity in RESTORE: A randomized 24-week natalizumab treatment interruption study , 2015, Neurology.

[24]  P. Sørensen,et al.  Recurrence or rebound of clinical relapses after discontinuation of natalizumab therapy in highly active MS patients , 2014, Journal of Neurology.

[25]  J. Lechner-Scott,et al.  Fingolimod after natalizumab and the risk of short-term relapse , 2014, Neurology.

[26]  L. Kappos,et al.  Temporal profile of lymphocyte counts and relationship with infections with fingolimod therapy , 2014, Multiple sclerosis.

[27]  X. Montalban,et al.  Risk stratification for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients treated with natalizumab , 2012, Multiple sclerosis.

[28]  K. Rammohan,et al.  WriteClick: Editor’s Choice DISEASE ACTIVITY RETURN DURING NATALIZUMAB TREATMENT INTERRUPTION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS , 2011 .

[29]  Jeffrey A. Cohen,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria , 2011, Annals of neurology.

[30]  S. Cole,et al.  Time scale and adjusted survival curves for marginal structural cox models. , 2010, American journal of epidemiology.

[31]  Stephen R Cole,et al.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[32]  E. Leray,et al.  Mitoxantrone as induction treatment in aggressive relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: treatment response factors in a 5 year follow-up observational study of 100 consecutive patients , 2007, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[33]  L. Kappos,et al.  MSBase: an international, online registry and platform for collaborative outcomes research in multiple sclerosis , 2006, Multiple sclerosis.

[34]  S. Vukusic,et al.  Age at disability milestones in multiple sclerosis. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  S. Vukusic,et al.  Natural history of multiple sclerosis: a unifying concept. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  S. Reingold,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria” , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[37]  H. Hartung,et al.  Mitoxantrone in progressive multiple sclerosis: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[38]  C. Poser,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis , 2001, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[39]  C Confavreux,et al.  Relapses and progression of disability in multiple sclerosis. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  F. Mcdowell,et al.  PROBLEMS OF EXPERIMENTAL TRIALS OF THERAPY IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: REPORT BY THE PANEL ON THE EVALUATION OF EXPERIMENTAL TRIALS OF THERAPY IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS , 1965, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Edmus Coordinating Natural history of multiple sclerosis: A unifying concept , 2006 .