Linear Precoding Versus Linear Multiuser Detection in Downlink TDD-CDMA Systems

In this paper, we compare two classes of linear interference suppression techniques for downlink TDD-CDMA systems, namely, linear multiuser detection methods (receiver processing) and linear precoding methods (transmitter processing). For the linear precoding schemes, we assume that the channel state information (CSI) is available only at the transmitter but not at the receiver (i.e., ultra simple receivers). We propose several precoding techniques and the corresponding power control algorithms. The performance metric used in the comparisons is the total power required at the transmitter to achieve a target SINR at the receiver. Our results reveal that in general multiuser detection and precoding offer similar performance; but in certain scenarios (e.g, low BER requirements or use of random spreading sequences), precoding can bring a substantial performance improvement. These results motivate the use of precoding techniques to reduce the complexity of the system and the mobile terminals (only a matched-filter to the own spreading sequence is required without CSI). Moreover, it is shown that the proposed chip-wise linear MMSE precoding method is optimal in the sense that it requires the minimum total transmitted power to meet a certain receiver SINR performance.

[1]  Masao Nakagawa,et al.  Pre-RAKE diversity combining in time division duplex CDMA mobile communications , 1995, Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[2]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[3]  A. Lee Swindlehurst,et al.  A vector-perturbation technique for near-capacity multiantenna multiuser communication-part I: channel inversion and regularization , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[4]  Robert F. H. Fischer,et al.  Precoding in multiantenna and multiuser communications , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Josef A. Nossek,et al.  Transmit Wiener filter for the downlink of TDDDS-CDMA systems , 2002, IEEE Seventh International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications,.

[6]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  A framework for opportunistic scheduling in wireless networks , 2003, Comput. Networks.

[7]  Masao Nakagawa,et al.  PreRAKE diversity combining in time-division duplex CDMA mobile communications , 1999 .

[8]  A. Lee Swindlehurst,et al.  A vector-perturbation technique for near-capacity multiantenna multiuser communication-part II: perturbation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[9]  Anders Høst-Madsen,et al.  Adaptive Transmitter Precoding for Time Division Duplex CDMA in Fading Multipath Channels: Strategy and Analysis , 2002, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[10]  Hans D. Hallen,et al.  Long-range prediction of fading signals , 2000, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[11]  Edward W. Knightly,et al.  Opportunistic fair scheduling over multiple wireless channels , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[12]  Robert F. H. Fischer,et al.  Improved MIMO precoding for decentralized receivers resembling concepts from lattice reduction , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[13]  Sergio Verdu,et al.  Multiuser Detection , 1998 .

[14]  Robert F. H. Fischer,et al.  Precoding in Multi-Antenna and Multi-User Communications , .

[15]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  Adaptive power control and MMSE interference suppression , 1998, Wirel. Networks.

[16]  Josef A. Nossek,et al.  Linear transmit processing in MIMO communications systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  Branimir R. Vojcic,et al.  Transmitter precoding in synchronous multiuser communications , 1998, IEEE Trans. Commun..