Virtually Expert: Modes of Environmental Computer Simulation Modeling

This paper challenges three assumptions common in the literature on expertise: that expertise is linearly derived from scientific knowledge; that experts always align with the established institutional order; and that expertise is a property acquired by individuals. We criticize these ideas by juxtaposing three distinct expert practices involved with flood risk management in England. Virtual engineering is associated with commercial consultancy and relies on standardized software packages to assess local flood inundation. Mathematical experimentation refers to academic scientists creating new digital renderings of the physical dynamics of flooding. Participatory modeling denotes research projects that aim to transform the relationships between experts and local communities. Focusing on different modes of modeling we contribute an analysis of how particular models articulate with specific politics of knowledge as experts form relationships with flood risk management actors. Our empirical study also shows how models can contribute to re-distribution of expertise in local flood risk management.

[1]  Mikaela Sundberg,et al.  The Everyday World of Simulation Modeling , 2009 .

[2]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science , 2003 .

[3]  S. Lane,et al.  Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method , 2011 .

[4]  Mikaela Sundberg,et al.  Credulous Modellers and Suspicious Experimentalists? Comparison of Model Output and Data in Meteorological Simulation Modelling , 2006 .

[5]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Co-constructing with stakeholders a role-playing game to initiate collective management of erosive runoff risks at the watershed scale , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  Participatory modelling of vulnerability and adaptive capacity in flood risk management , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[7]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Virtual Engineering: Computer Simulation Modelling for Flood Risk Management in England , 2011 .

[8]  Nuno Videira,et al.  Scoping river basin management issues with participatory modelling: The Baixo Guadiana experience , 2009 .

[9]  Catharina Landström,et al.  Flood apprentices: an exercise in making things public , 2011 .

[10]  M. Callon,et al.  Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy , 2009 .

[11]  François Bousquet,et al.  Preface to this thematic issue , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music? , 2006, Public Health Genomics.

[13]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Models as Mediating Instruments , 1999 .

[14]  Sarah Whatmore,et al.  Manning's n - putting roughness to work , 2010 .

[15]  François Bousquet,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  Arie Rip,et al.  Constructing Expertise , 2003 .

[17]  B. Wynne.  Rationality and Ritual: Participation and Exclusion in Nuclear Decision-Making , 2010 .

[18]  Frank van Kouwen,et al.  Computer-Supported Cognitive Mapping for Participatory Problem Structuring , 2009 .

[19]  Eric Winsberg,et al.  Simulated Experiments: Methodology for a Virtual World , 2003, Philosophy of Science.

[20]  B. Wynne.  Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism , 2003 .

[21]  Margaret Morrison,et al.  Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science , 1999 .

[22]  H. M. Collins,et al.  The Third Wave of Science Studies , 2002, Science, Technology, and Society.

[23]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Knowledge-theoretic models in hydrology , 2010 .

[24]  F. Fischer.  Democracy and Expertise , 2009 .

[25]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. , 1991 .

[26]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Assessing the effects of urbanization on annual runoff and flood events using an integrated hydrological modeling system for Qinhuai River basin, China , 2012 .

[27]  G. Kallis,et al.  Participation and evaluation for sustainable river basin governance , 2009 .

[28]  Transgressive Competence , 2000 .

[29]  Tarja Knuuttila,et al.  Modelling and representing: An artefactual approach to model-based representation , 2011 .

[30]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Coproducing Flood Risk Knowledge: Redistributing Expertise in Critical ‘Participatory Modelling’ , 2011 .

[31]  S. Turner.  What is the Problem with Experts? , 2001 .

[32]  S. Whatmore,et al.  Political matter : technoscience, democracy, and public life , 2010 .

[33]  E. Gaddis,et al.  Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: A perspective from modeling practitioners , 2008 .

[34]  Ali Sarhadi,et al.  Probabilistic flood inundation mapping of ungauged rivers: Linking GIS techniques and frequency analysis , 2012 .

[35]  F. Bousquet,et al.  Preface to the thematic issue modelling with stakeholders : editorial , 2010 .

[36]  François Bousquet,et al.  Suitability of Multi-Agent Simulations to study irrigated system viability: application to case studies in the Senegal River Valley , 2004 .

[37]  Mary S. Morgan,et al.  How Well Do Facts Travel?: The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge , 2010 .

[38]  H Roberts,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .