Endoscopic and histological pitfalls in the diagnosis of celiac disease: A multicentre study assessing the current practice.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS the diagnosis of celiac disease requires small bowel biopsies to identify the characteristic mucosal changes. The current biopsy practice among endoscopists for celiac disease is in most part unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the different diagnostic policies in various centers in their current practice. METHOD information from a total of 931 confirmed celiac disease patients was retrospectively obtained retrospectively from nine centers in European and Middle Eastern countries. The number of small-bowel biopsies obtained from the duodenal bulb and the second part of the duodenum was compared among different centers. RESULTS the most frequent stage of mucosal changes amongst Iranian subjects was Marsh IIIa whereas in the rest of the study population was Marsh IIIc. Marsh I and Marsh II were more prevalent in adults (P < 0.05) and Marsh IIIc was significantly higher in pediatric ages between 1 and 15 (P < 0.05). The most common number of biopsy specimens obtained from Romanian subjects was 1 (52% of cases), followed by 2 for Iranian (56%), 3 for Lithuanian (66.7%) and British patients (65%) and 4 for Italian patients (48.3%). For majority of cases, anemia was the most prevalent symptom (18.7%) followed by malabsorption (10.5%), diarrhea (9.3%) and dyspepsia (8.2%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS despite the evidence-based recommendations, this study revealed a poor compliance with major guidelines on diagnosis of celiac disease. We emphasize that taking adequate number of duodenal biopsies should be implemented for an accurate diagnosis and also for the exclusion of celiac disease.

[1]  G. Bassotti,et al.  Avoiding biopsy in iron deficiency anemia is not a cost-effective approach. , 2012, Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva.

[2]  M. Mearin,et al.  Coeliac Disease Diagnosis: ESPGHAN 1990 Criteria or Need For a Change? Results of a Questionnaire , 2012, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[3]  S. Cross,et al.  A Prospective Study of Duodenal Bulb Biopsy in Newly Diagnosed and Established Adult Celiac Disease , 2011, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[4]  J. Goñi,et al.  Refractory iron-deficiency anemia and gluten intolerance - Response to gluten-free diet. , 2011, Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva.

[5]  A. López-Vázquez,et al.  Differences between pediatric and adult celiac disease. , 2011, Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva.

[6]  V. Villanacci,et al.  Challenges in endoscopy and histological diagnosis of celiac disease , 2011, Endoscopy.

[7]  A. Sonnenberg,et al.  A national study of Helicobactor pylori infection in gastric biopsy specimens. , 2010, Gastroenterology.

[8]  V. Villanacci,et al.  How Patchy Is Patchy Villous Atrophy?: Distribution Pattern of Histological Lesions in the Duodenum of Children With Celiac Disease , 2010, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[9]  J. Scolapio.  Variability of Histopathological Changes in Childhood Celiac Disease , 2010 .

[10]  M. Zali,et al.  Celiac disease and Hp infection association in Iran. , 2009, Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Digestiva.

[11]  M. Zali,et al.  Atypical presentation is dominant and typical for coeliac disease. , 2009, Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD.

[12]  A. Neugut,et al.  Adherence to biopsy guidelines for Barrett's esophagus surveillance in the community setting in the United States. , 2009, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[13]  V. Villanacci,et al.  Microscopic enteritis: novel prospect in coeliac disease clinical and immuno-histogenesis. Evolution in diagnostic and treatment strategies. , 2009, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[14]  R. Yantiss,et al.  Optimal Approach to Obtaining Mucosal Biopsies for Assessment of Inflammatory Disorders of the Gastrointestinal Tract , 2009, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[15]  D. Sanders,et al.  Obtaining duodenal biopsy specimens for celiac disease: is site as important as number? , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[16]  C. Bernstein,et al.  How many duodenal biopsy specimens are required to make a diagnosis of celiac disease? , 2008, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[17]  H. Freeman.  Pearls and pitfalls in the diagnosis of adult celiac disease. , 2008, Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie.

[18]  S. Cross,et al.  Patchy villous atrophy in adult patients with suspected gluten-sensitive enteropathy: is a multiple duodenal biopsy strategy appropriate? , 2007, Endoscopy.

[19]  K. Rostami,et al.  Endoscopy and small-bowel biopsy in celiac disease: indications and implications. , 2007, Endoscopy.

[20]  L. Virta,et al.  Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Clinical Practice: Physician's Alertness to the Condition Essential , 2007, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[21]  A. Gasbarrini,et al.  A highly accurate method for monitoring histological recovery in patients with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet using an endoscopic approach that avoids the need for biopsy: a double-center study. , 2007, Endoscopy.

[22]  M. Kagnoff,et al.  American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. , 2006, Gastroenterology.

[23]  S. Lecleire,et al.  Endoscopic markers of villous atrophy are not useful for the detection of celiac disease in patients with dyspeptic symptoms. , 2006, Endoscopy.

[24]  V. Villanacci,et al.  Variability of Histologic Lesions in Relation to Biopsy Site in Gluten-Sensitive Enteropathy , 2005, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[25]  P. Vilmann,et al.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of celiac lymph nodes. , 2004, Endoscopy.

[26]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Variation in Small Bowel Biopsy Performance among Diverse Endoscopy Settings: Results from a National Endoscopic Database , 2004, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[27]  K. Ramesar,et al.  Routine duodenal biopsies to exclude celiac disease? Not yet. , 2004, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[28]  J. Abrams,et al.  Seronegative Celiac Disease: Increased Prevalence with Lesser Degrees of Villous Atrophy , 2004, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[29]  M. Mazzilli,et al.  Patchy Villous Atrophy of the Duodenum in Childhood Celiac Disease , 2004, Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition.

[30]  J. Murray,et al.  Routine duodenal biopsies to exclude celiac disease? , 2003, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[31]  G. Oberhuber,et al.  Diagnostic duodenal bulb biopsy in celiac disease. , 2001, Endoscopy.

[32]  K. Rostami.  Sensitivity of antiendomysium and antigliadin antibodies in untreated celiac disease: disappointing in clinical practice. , 1999 .

[33]  B. V. von Blomberg,et al.  Sensitivity of antiendomysium and antigliadin antibodies in untreated celiac disease: disappointing in clinical practice , 1999, American Journal of Gastroenterology.