Manufacturing-error-based maintenance for high-precision machine tools

Nowadays, the condition-based maintenance (CBM), in which repairs are triggered by the heuristic symptoms of the component faults, is finding increasing applications in the industrial fields. However, for the high-precision machine tools, the conventional CBM might not be the optimal option, which is uneconomic and incapable of ensuring their machining accuracy. In order to overcome these shortcomings, this paper propose the manufacturing-error-based maintenance (MEBM), where the repairs are initiated based on the manufacturing errors instead of the heuristic symptoms. In MEBM, repairs are taken properly at the occurrence of the excessive machining errors, and therefore, the premature and redundant maintenance can be avoided and the maintenance cost can be minimized; what is more, the machining errors are controlled in the closed loops, and therefore, the machining accuracy can be guaranteed. Based on the principles of the MEBM, a prototype maintenance system—the transient backlash error (TBE)-based maintenance system—is established. To achieve this aim, first, the width of the backlash in the mechanical chain is measured by utilizing the built-in encoders and the analytical mapping relationship between the backlash width and the TBE is derived. Relying on these foundations, the TBE can be indirectly estimated. Then, the warning threshold of the TBE is customized according to the permissible roundness error of the workpiece. Thus, the maintenance actions can be precisely implemented: when the monitored TBE exceeds its warning threshold, maintenance workers will be notified to lessen the backlash width, and meanwhile, the permissible maximal size for the backlash will also be informed.

[1]  Namchul Do,et al.  A predictive maintenance approach based on real-time internal parameter monitoring , 2016 .

[2]  Daming Lin,et al.  A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance , 2006 .

[3]  Ming Zhao,et al.  A hybrid three-probe method for measuring the roundness error and the spindle error , 2016 .

[4]  Alexander Verl,et al.  Sensorless automated condition monitoring for the control of the predictive maintenance of machine tools , 2009 .

[5]  R. Barlow,et al.  Optimum Preventive Maintenance Policies , 1960 .

[6]  Albert H. C. Tsang,et al.  Condition-based maintenance: tools and decision making , 1995 .

[7]  F S Nowlan,et al.  RELIABILITY-CENTERED MAINTENANCE , 1978 .

[8]  Jing Lin,et al.  Feature Extraction Based on Morlet Wavelet and its Application for Mechanical Fault Diagnosis , 2000 .

[9]  Rajkumar Roy,et al.  Continuous maintenance and the future – Foundations and technological challenges , 2016 .

[10]  Hongzhou Wang,et al.  A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  P. C. Tsai,et al.  Ball screw preload loss detection using ball pass frequency , 2014 .

[12]  Jay Lee,et al.  Maintenance: Changing role in life cycle management , 2004 .

[13]  Robert B. Randall,et al.  Rolling element bearing diagnostics—A tutorial , 2011 .

[14]  Jing Lin,et al.  Analysis of the transient backlash error in CNC machine tools with closed loops , 2015 .

[15]  Seungchul Lee,et al.  Joint decision making for maintenance and production scheduling of production systems , 2013 .

[16]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Applications of maintenance optimization models : a review and analysis , 1996 .

[17]  L. Pintelon,et al.  A framework for maintenance concept development , 2002 .

[18]  T. Hoshi Damage Monitoring of Ball Bearing , 2006 .

[19]  S. Saravanan,et al.  Condition monitoring studies on spindle bearing of a lathe , 2006 .