How word decoding skill impacts text memory: The centrality deficit and how domain knowledge can compensate

We examined text memory in children with word reading deficits to determine how these difficulties impact representations of text meaning. We show that even though children with poor word decoding recall more central than peripheral information, they show a significantly bigger deficit relative to controls on central than on peripheral information. We call this the centrality deficit and argue that it is the consequence of insufficient cognitive resources for connecting ideas together due to these children’s resources being diverted from comprehension to word decoding. We investigated a possible compensatory mechanism for making these connections. Because a text representation is a synthesis of text information and a reader’s prior knowledge, we hypothesized that having knowledge of the passage topic might reduce or eliminate the centrality deficit. Our results support this knowledge compensation hypothesis: The centrality deficit was evident when poor readers did not have prior knowledge, but was eliminated when they did. This presents an exciting avenue to pursue for possible remediation of reading comprehension in children with word identification difficulties.

[1]  Richard K. Olson,et al.  Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. , 1994 .

[2]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables , 1975 .

[3]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .

[4]  Karin Vermeulen,et al.  Paths to Reading Comprehension in At-Risk Second-Grade Readers , 2006, Journal of learning disabilities.

[5]  M. Barnes,et al.  Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Lauren Leslie,et al.  Effect of Prior Knowledge on Good and Poor Readers' Memory of Text. , 1988 .

[7]  R. Gersten,et al.  History as Narrative , 2007, Journal of learning disabilities.

[8]  Children's Reading Rate and Retention as a Function of the Number of Propositions in a Text. , 1984 .

[9]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Children's comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective , 2007 .

[10]  Isabelle Y. Liberman,et al.  Phonology and reading disability : solving the reading puzzle , 1989 .

[11]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Individual differences in children's text comprehension. , 1994 .

[12]  Richard K. Olson,et al.  Genetic and environmental influences on reading and listening comprehension , 2006 .

[13]  James F. Voss,et al.  Text Processing of Domain-Related Information for Individuals with High and Low Domain Knowledge: Methodological Considerations. , 1979 .

[14]  M. Barnes,et al.  The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age. , 1996, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[15]  Peter N. Winograd.  Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts , 1984 .

[16]  Debra L. Long,et al.  Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. , 1994 .

[17]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Rating the Importance of Structural Units of Prose Passages: A Problem of Metacognitive Development. , 1977 .

[18]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Causal relatedness and importance of story events , 1985 .

[19]  Barbara J. Wendling,et al.  Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. , 2009 .

[20]  Paula J. Clarke,et al.  General cognitive ability in children with reading comprehension difficulties. , 2002, The British journal of educational psychology.

[21]  J. Keenan,et al.  Reading Comprehension Tests Vary in the Skills They Assess: Differential Dependence on Decoding and Oral Comprehension , 2008 .

[22]  C. Fletcher,et al.  Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts , 1988 .

[23]  Lauren Leslie,et al.  Qualitative Reading Inventory-4 , 2005 .

[24]  P. Broek.  The effects of causal relations and hierarchical position on the importance of story statements , 1988 .

[25]  Leo Lentz,et al.  Coherence Marking, Prior Knowledge, and Comprehension of Informative and Persuasive Texts: Sorting Things Out , 2008 .

[26]  E. J. O'Brien,et al.  The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[27]  K. Cain,et al.  The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills , 2003 .

[28]  D. J. Foss,et al.  Text structure and reading time for sentences , 1980 .

[29]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Individual Differences in Response to Early Interventions in Reading: The Lingering Problem of Treatment Resisters , 2000 .

[30]  Joseph W. Alba.  Notes, Comments, and New Findings: The Role of Context in the Encoding of Information. , 1981 .

[31]  E J O'Brien,et al.  Effects of centrality on retrieval of text-based concepts. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Ernest T. Goetz,et al.  Reading in Perspective: What Real Cops and Pretend Burglars Look for in a Story. Technical Report No. 266. , 1982 .

[33]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[34]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The representation of meaning in memory , 1974 .

[35]  M. Daneman,et al.  Facilitating Knowledge-Based Inferences in Less-Skilled Readers , 1998, Contemporary educational psychology.

[36]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text. , 2005, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[37]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences , 1973 .

[38]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children , 1999 .

[39]  Kate Nation,et al.  Children's Reading Comprehension Difficulties , 2008 .

[40]  G. Reid Lyon,et al.  Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities : new views on measurement issues , 1994 .

[41]  R. Olson.  Genes, environment, and dyslexia the 2005 Norman Geschwind memorial lecture , 2006, Annals of dyslexia.

[42]  H. Lee Swanson,et al.  Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis. , 1997 .

[43]  H. Oostendorp,et al.  The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading , 1998 .

[44]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[45]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  How Including Prior Knowledge As a Subject Variable May Change Outcomes of Learning Research , 2004 .

[46]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Effects of the Organization of Text on Memory: Tests of Retrieval and Response Criterion Hypotheses. , 1980 .

[47]  Steven A. Stahl,et al.  Children's reading comprehension and assessment , 2005 .

[48]  P. Broek,et al.  The Landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of memory representation. , 1999 .

[49]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994 .

[50]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[51]  Mary E. Curtis,et al.  Development of Components of Reading Skill. , 1980 .

[52]  Sandra S. Smiley,et al.  Recall of thematically relevant material by adolescent good and poor readers as a function of written versus oral presentation , 1977 .

[53]  C. L. Hansen.  Story Retelling Used with Average and Learning Disabled Readers as a Measure of Reading Comprehension , 1978 .

[54]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Children's Comprehension Problems in Oral and Written Language: A Cognitive Perspective. Challenges in Language and Literacy. , 2007 .

[55]  Natalie L. Hedberg,et al.  Learning-disabled adolescents' comprehension of naturalistic narratives , 1996 .

[56]  Charles Hulme,et al.  The science of reading: A handbook. , 2005 .

[57]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events , 1985 .

[58]  Donald Shankweiler,et al.  Words to Meanings , 1999 .

[59]  George J. Spilich,et al.  Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. , 1979 .

[60]  G. Lyon,et al.  Toward a definition of dyslexia , 1995, Annals of dyslexia.

[61]  A. Kamhi.  Knowledge Deficits: The True Crisis in Education , 2007 .

[62]  Paul van den Broek,et al.  Causal networks versus goal hierarchies in summarizing text , 1986 .