Autonomous Workgroups: An Evaluation at an Industrial Site

This paper describes an exploratory longitudinal study with semi-autonomous work groups in a large, unionized heavy engineering workshop. The results show that groups which adopted the new set of work arrangements reported substantially different perceptual, behavioral, and affective responses to those groups which continued to employ more traditional work practices. These findings and their implications for similar work sites are discussed.

[1]  C. Pearson.  The Effects of Participation on Job Motivation, Job Satisfaction and Work Practices: A Case Study in a Heavy Engineering Workshop† , 1992 .

[2]  Anthony B. Costanza,et al.  Xerox and the ACTWU: Using labor‐management teams to remain competitive , 1991 .

[3]  Mervyn G. Marasinghe,et al.  SAS System for Linear Models , 1991 .

[4]  R. Wellins,et al.  The Key to Self-Directed Teams. , 1991 .

[5]  Harlan R. Jessup.  New Roles in Team Leadership. , 1990 .

[6]  M. L. Patterson.  Accelerating innovation: A dip into the meme pool , 1990 .

[7]  Ronald J. Grey,et al.  The people side of productivity: Responding to changing employee values , 1990 .

[8]  Patrick R. Liverpool.  Employee participation in decision-making: An analysis of the perceptions of members and nonmembers of quality circles , 1990 .

[9]  B. Acutt.  Repetition Strain Injury (RSI): Legacy of Technology in Changing Times or Human Resource Management Found Wanting?* , 1990 .

[10]  R. O. Knorr.  A Corporate Self‐Assessment Checklist , 1990 .

[11]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent: Effects on task strategies and performance. , 1990 .

[12]  Michael R. Dulworth,et al.  Employee involvement systems in U.S. corporations: Right objectives, wrong strategies , 1990 .

[13]  Wriston Wb.  The state of American management. , 1990 .

[14]  Lee A. Towe.  Survey finds employee involvement a priority for necessary innovation , 1989 .

[15]  Barrie Dale,et al.  The operating characteristics of quality circles and yield improvement teams: A case study comparison , 1989 .

[16]  T. Gilmore,et al.  The psychodynamics of a cultural change: Learnings from a factory , 1989 .

[17]  T. Connolly,et al.  Goals, strategy development and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting , 1989 .

[18]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Consequences of Quality Circles in an Industrial Setting: A Longitudinal Assessment , 1988 .

[19]  Steven D. Jones,et al.  Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity. , 1988 .

[20]  Gary W. Muller,et al.  Designing Effective Organizations: The Sociotechnical Systems Perspective , 1988 .

[21]  D. M. Georgoff,et al.  Harvard Business Review: David M. Georgoff and Robert G. Murdick, manager's guide to forecasting, 64 (Jan-Feb.) (1986) 110-120 , 1988 .

[22]  C. Pearson.  Participative Goal Setting as a Strategy for Improving Performance and Job Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Evaluation with Railway Track Maintenance Gangs , 1987 .

[23]  Tamao Matsui,et al.  Effects of goals and feedback on performance in groups. , 1987 .

[24]  F. Drasgow,et al.  A Revision of the Job Diagnostic Survey: Elimination of a Measurement Artifact , 1987 .

[25]  M. Warner,et al.  Organizations, Participation and Recession: An Analysis of Recent Evidence , 1987 .

[26]  R. A. Cosier,et al.  Search for excellence, learn from Japan--Are these panaceas or problems? , 1986 .

[27]  Miriam Erez,et al.  Participative goal-setting: Social, motivational, and cognitive factors. , 1986 .

[28]  J. Brockner,et al.  Self-Esteem and Task Performance in Quality Circles , 1986 .

[29]  Noel M. Tichy,et al.  The Transformational Leader. , 1988 .

[30]  T. Wall,et al.  Outcomes of Autonomous Workgroups: A Long-Term Field Experiment , 1986 .

[31]  Mitchell Lee Marks,et al.  Employee participation in a Quality Circle program: Impact on quality of work life, productivity, and absenteeism. , 1986 .

[32]  Robert Bove.  Video Training: The State of the Industry. , 1986 .

[33]  Susan Albers Mohrman,et al.  The design and use of effective employee participation groups: Implications for human resource management , 1985 .

[34]  Alden G. Lank,et al.  Volvo: A report on the workshop on production technology and quality of working life , 1985 .

[35]  A. Rafaeli.  QUALITY CIRCLES AND EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES , 1985 .

[36]  Vandra L. Huber,et al.  Effects of task difficulty, goal setting, and strategy on performance of a heuristic task. , 1985 .

[37]  L. Smeltzer,et al.  Knowing the ropes: Organizational requirements for quality circles , 1985 .

[38]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  The Impact of Participation on Goal Acceptance and Performance: A Two-Step Model , 1985 .

[39]  E. Lawler,et al.  Quality circles after the fad. , 1985, Harvard business review.

[40]  Can quality circles survive in the United States , 1984 .

[41]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Quality circles—The latest fad or a real winner? , 1984 .

[42]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Autonomous work groups in a greenfield site: A comparative study , 1983 .

[43]  G. Latham,et al.  The Motivational Effects of Participation Versus Goal Setting on Performance , 1983 .

[44]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Conversations within self-managed work groups , 1982 .

[45]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[46]  T. Wall,et al.  A longitudinal field study of group work redesig , 1981 .

[47]  J. Witte.  Democracy, Authority, and Alienation in Work: Workers' Participation in an American Corporation , 1980 .

[48]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Research in Organizational Behavior, Volume 1. , 1980 .

[49]  R. Schuler.  A Role and Expectancy Perception Model of Participation in Decision Making , 1980 .

[50]  Leonard A. Schlesinger,et al.  Do Supervisors Thrive in Participative Work Systems , 1979 .

[51]  James L. Koch,et al.  Influence of Organization Structure on Role Conflict and Ambiguity for Three Occupational Groupings. , 1979 .

[52]  Louis E. Davis,et al.  The Design of Jobs , 1966 .

[53]  T. G. Cummings.  Self-Regulating Work Groups: A Socio-Technical Synthesis , 1978 .

[54]  D. Rousseau.  Technological differences in job characteristics, employee satisfaction, and motivation: A synthesis of job design research and sociotechnical systems theory , 1977 .

[55]  E. A. Locke,et al.  An Experimental Case Study of the Successes and Failures of Job Enrichment in a Government Agency , 1976 .

[56]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[57]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness. , 1975 .

[58]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[59]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[60]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[61]  Gerald H. Shure,et al.  Group Planning and Task Effectiveness , 1962 .

[62]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[63]  F. Herzberg,et al.  The motivation to work , 1960 .

[64]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[65]  A. K. Rice.  Productivity and Social Organization in an Indian Weaving Shed , 1953 .

[66]  E. Trist,et al.  Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal-Getting , 1951 .