Simplifying the digital workflow of facial prostheses manufacturing using a three-dimensional (3D) database: setup, development, and aspects of virtual data validation for reproduction.

PURPOSE To set up the digital database (DDB) of various anatomical parts, skin details and retention elements in order to simplify the digital workflow of facial prostheses manufacturing; and to quantify the reproduction of skin wrinkles on the prostheses prototypes with stereolithography (SLA) and direct light processing (DLP) methods. METHODS Two structured light scanners were used to obtain the nasal and auricle forms of 50 probands. Furthermore, the ala nasi and scapha areas were captured with the digital single lens reflex camera and saved in jpeg format. The four magnetic retention elements were remodeled in computer aided design (CAD) software. The 14 test blocks with embossed wrinkles of 0.05-0.8mm were printed with SLA and DLP methods and afterwards analyzed by means of profilometry and confocal microscopy. RESULTS The introduced DDB allows for production of customized facial prosthesis and makes it possible to consider the integration of concrete retention elements on the CAD stage, which makes the prosthesis modelling more predictable and efficient. The obtained skin structures can be applied onto the prosthesis surface for customization. The reproduction of wrinkles from 0.1 to 0.8mm in depth may be associated with the loss of 4.5%-11% of its profile with SLA or DLP respectively. Besides, the reproduction of 0.05mm wrinkles may be met with up to 40% profile increasement. CONCLUSIONS The utilization of DDB may simplify the digital workflow of facial prostheses manufacturing. The transfer of digitally applied skin wrinkles till the prostheses' prototypes may be associated with deviations from 11 to 40%.

[1]  Jorge Vicente Lopes da Silva,et al.  Monoscopic photogrammetry to obtain 3D models by a mobile device: a method for making facial prostheses , 2016, Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery.

[2]  Steffan John Rhys Daniel Towards developing CAD/CAM solutions in the retention of extra-oral facial prosthetics , 2014 .

[3]  Constanze Keutel,et al.  Direct 3D printing of silicone facial prostheses: A preliminary experience in digital workflow. , 2018, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  Robin Richards,et al.  A comparison of three methods to evaluate the position of an artificial ear on the deficient side of the face from a three-dimensional surface scan of patients with hemifacial microsomia. , 2012, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[5]  Martyn Sherriff,et al.  Development of a 3D printable maxillofacial silicone: Part I. Optimization of polydimethylsiloxane chains and cross-linker concentration. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[7]  Sushma Yadav,et al.  CAD/CAM‐Assisted Auricular Prosthesis Fabrication for a Quick, Precise, and More Retentive Outcome: A Clinical Report , 2017, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[8]  Alessandro Pozzi,et al.  The smiling scan technique: Facially driven guided surgery and prosthetics. , 2018, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[9]  Lu Ji,et al.  Evaluation of direct and indirect additive manufacture of maxillofacial prostheses , 2012, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[10]  W. J. van der Meer,et al.  Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  G. Lemperle,et al.  A classification of facial wrinkles. , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  Bernd Reitemeier,et al.  Creation and Utilization of a Digital Database for Nasal Prosthesis Models , 2013, Oncology Research and Treatment.

[13]  D Eggbeer,et al.  A Pilot Study in the Application of Texture Relief for Digitally Designed Facial Prostheses , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[14]  A. Vissink,et al.  Current state of craniofacial prosthetic rehabilitation. , 2013, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[15]  C. Keutel,et al.  Auricular Prostheses Produced by Means of Conventional and Digital Workflows: A Clinical Report on Esthetic Outcomes. , 2018, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[16]  Massimiliano Fantini,et al.  Immediate facial rehabilitation in cancer patients using CAD–CAM and rapid prototyping technology: a pilot study , 2010, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[17]  F. Alzoubi,et al.  Improved Construction of Auricular Prosthesis by Digital Technologies , 2015, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[18]  Robin Richards,et al.  A comparison of prosthetic ear models created from data captured by computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and laser scanning. , 2007, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[19]  T. Taylor Clinical Maxillofacial Prosthetics , 2000 .

[20]  Heiner Weber,et al.  Additive Manufacturing: A Comparative Analysis of Dimensional Accuracy and Skin Texture Reproduction of Auricular Prostheses Replicas , 2019, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[21]  Martyn Sherriff,et al.  Development of a 3D printable maxillofacial silicone: Part II. Optimization of moderator and thixotropic agent , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  Jason Watson,et al.  Complete integration of technology for improved reproduction of auricular prostheses. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.