Learning, Internal Research, and Spillovers Evidence from a Sample of R&D Laboratories

This paper presents new evidence on the practice of industrial Research and Development (R&D), especially the allocation between learning and internal research, and the role of outside knowledge, as represented by R&D spillovers, in reshaping this allocation. The evidence describes the sources of outside knowledge, portrays the flow of that knowledge into firms, and interprets the channels by which outside knowledge influences R&D. The empirical work is based on a sample of 220 R&D laboratories owned by 115 firms in the U.S. chemicals, machinery, electrical equipment, and motor vehicles industries. The findings are consistent with the view that universities and firms generate technological opportunities in R&D laboratories. In addition to partnerships that define rather strict channels of opportunity, the paper uncovers broader effects of R&D spillovers. The results also suggest that academic spillovers drive learning about universities, and that industrial spillovers drive learning about industry. In this way externally derived opportunities reshape the rate and direction of R&D. Overall the findings paint an image of practitioners of industrial R&D reaching aggressively for opportunities, rather than waiting for opportunities to come to them.

[1]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Inter-Industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth , 1982 .

[2]  Samuel Kortum,et al.  What is behind the recent surge in patenting , 1999 .

[3]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[4]  William Gould,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation with stata , 1999 .

[5]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  R&D Price Indexes and Real R&D Expenditures in the United States , 1982 .

[6]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations , 1977 .

[7]  John E. Jankowski Do we need a price index for industrial R&D? , 1993 .

[8]  James D. Adams,et al.  Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  Edward J. Gornowski The History of Chemical Engineering at Exxon , 1980 .

[10]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out , 1985 .

[11]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study , 1981 .

[12]  John L. Enos,et al.  Invention and Innovation in the Petroleum Refining Industry , 1962 .

[13]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[14]  N. Rosenberg,et al.  Chemical Engineering as a General Purpose Technology , 2000 .

[15]  Lillian Hoddeson The entry of the quantum theory of solids into the Bell Telephone Laboratories, 1925–40: A case-study of the industrial application of fundamental science , 1980 .

[16]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  The Link Between Science and Invention: The Case of the Transistor , 1962 .

[17]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  General Purpose Technologies , 2005 .

[18]  James D. Adams,et al.  Bounding the Effects of R&D an Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data , 1996 .

[19]  Helen Shapiro Engines of Growth , 1994 .

[20]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[21]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  The Anatomy of Industry R&D Intensity Distributions , 1992 .

[22]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  TRANSCENDENTAL LOGARITHMIC PRODUCTION FRONTIERS , 1973 .

[23]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[24]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[25]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D , 1988 .