Conformational Transitions upon Ligand Binding: Holo-Structure Prediction from Apo Conformations

Biological function of proteins is frequently associated with the formation of complexes with small-molecule ligands. Experimental structure determination of such complexes at atomic resolution, however, can be time-consuming and costly. Computational methods for structure prediction of protein/ligand complexes, particularly docking, are as yet restricted by their limited consideration of receptor flexibility, rendering them not applicable for predicting protein/ligand complexes if large conformational changes of the receptor upon ligand binding are involved. Accurate receptor models in the ligand-bound state (holo structures), however, are a prerequisite for successful structure-based drug design. Hence, if only an unbound (apo) structure is available distinct from the ligand-bound conformation, structure-based drug design is severely limited. We present a method to predict the structure of protein/ligand complexes based solely on the apo structure, the ligand and the radius of gyration of the holo structure. The method is applied to ten cases in which proteins undergo structural rearrangements of up to 7.1 Å backbone RMSD upon ligand binding. In all cases, receptor models within 1.6 Å backbone RMSD to the target were predicted and close-to-native ligand binding poses were obtained for 8 of 10 cases in the top-ranked complex models. A protocol is presented that is expected to enable structure modeling of protein/ligand complexes and structure-based drug design for cases where crystal structures of ligand-bound conformations are not available.

[1]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Access the most recent version at doi: 10.1110/ps.21302 References , 2001 .

[2]  Kurt Wüthrich,et al.  Effective rotational correlation times of proteins from NMR relaxation interference. , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[3]  David A. Agard,et al.  Structural Analysis of E. coli hsp90 Reveals Dramatic Nucleotide-Dependent Conformational Rearrangements , 2006, Cell.

[4]  Wolfgang Wende,et al.  Plasmodium falciparum glutathione S‐transferase—Structural and mechanistic studies on ligand binding and enzyme inhibition , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[5]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  J. Ponder,et al.  Force fields for protein simulations. , 2003, Advances in protein chemistry.

[7]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  Richard D. Taylor,et al.  Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD , 2003, Proteins.

[10]  S. Perkins,et al.  Structural studies of proteins by high-flux X-ray and neutron solution scattering. , 1988, The Biochemical journal.

[11]  S. Teague Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[12]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  Eric J. Sorin,et al.  Exploring the helix-coil transition via all-atom equilibrium ensemble simulations. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[14]  L. Toledo,et al.  Structural analysis of the lymphocyte-specific kinase Lck in complex with non-selective and Src family selective kinase inhibitors. , 2000, Structure.

[15]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  G. Scuseria,et al.  Gaussian 03, Revision E.01. , 2007 .

[17]  Friedrich Förster,et al.  Integration of small-angle X-ray scattering data into structural modeling of proteins and their assemblies. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Automatic prediction of protein interactions with large scale motion , 2007, Proteins.

[19]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  O. Glatter,et al.  19 – Small-Angle X-ray Scattering , 1973 .

[21]  Berk Hess,et al.  LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[22]  W. Ehrenberg,et al.  Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering , 1952, Nature.

[23]  Tim J. P. Hubbard,et al.  SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[25]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[26]  Dennis E Danley,et al.  Crystallization to obtain protein-ligand complexes for structure-aided drug design. , 2006, Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography.

[27]  R Powers,et al.  Validity of using the radius of gyration as a restraint in NMR protein structure determination. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  R. Friesner,et al.  Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[29]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[30]  Bert L. de Groot,et al.  tCONCOORD‐GUI: Visually supported conformational sampling of bioactive molecules , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[31]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Shumei Yang,et al.  MgATP-induced conformational change of the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. , 2005, Biophysical chemistry.

[33]  J. Skolnick,et al.  What is the relationship between the global structures of apo and holo proteins? , 2007, Proteins.

[34]  Wolfgang Sadee,et al.  The venus flytrap of periplasmic binding proteins: An ancient protein module present in multiple drug receptors , 1999, AAPS PharmSci.

[35]  M. Blackledge,et al.  Structural characterization of flexible proteins using small-angle X-ray scattering. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[36]  Christopher W. Murray,et al.  The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: Application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase , 1999, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[37]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  A Method for Biomolecular Structural Recognition and Docking Allowing Conformational Flexibility , 1998, J. Comput. Biol..

[38]  R Nussinov,et al.  Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: Insights from an open to closed conformational isomers , 1998, Proteins.

[39]  Jens Meiler,et al.  ROSETTALIGAND: Protein–small molecule docking with full side‐chain flexibility , 2006, Proteins.

[40]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  GROMACS 4:  Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[41]  Michel F Sanner,et al.  FLIPDock: Docking flexible ligands into flexible receptors , 2007, Proteins.

[42]  P. Kollman,et al.  Settle: An analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models , 1992 .

[43]  Theo Wallimann,et al.  Changes of creatine kinase structure upon ligand binding as seen by small-angle scattering☆ , 1996 .

[44]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[45]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[46]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Docking and scoring with alternative side‐chain conformations , 2009, Proteins.

[47]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  Yaoqi Zhou,et al.  Specific interactions for ab initio folding of protein terminal regions with secondary structures , 2008, Proteins.

[49]  M. Gerstein,et al.  A database of macromolecular motions. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[50]  C. E. Peishoff,et al.  A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[51]  Dmitri I Svergun,et al.  Advances in structure analysis using small-angle scattering in solution. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[52]  Malcolm D. Walkinshaw,et al.  Studying protein–ligand interactions using protein crystallography , 2005 .

[53]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[54]  Supa Hannongbua,et al.  Substrate induced structural and dynamics changes in human phosphomevalonate kinase and implications for mechanism , 2009, Proteins.

[55]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  A semiempirical free energy force field with charge‐based desolvation , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[56]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[57]  Bert L de Groot,et al.  Geometry-based sampling of conformational transitions in proteins. , 2007, Structure.

[58]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Geometry‐based flexible and symmetric protein docking , 2005, Proteins.

[59]  Tim J. P. Hubbard,et al.  SCOP database in 2002: refinements accommodate structural genomics , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[60]  Erin S. Bolstad,et al.  In pursuit of virtual lead optimization: Pruning ensembles of receptor structures for increased efficiency and accuracy during docking , 2009, Proteins.

[61]  G. Vriend,et al.  Prediction of protein conformational freedom from distance constraints , 1997, Proteins.

[62]  M S Chapman,et al.  Induced fit in arginine kinase. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[63]  R. Glen,et al.  Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[64]  Friedrich Förster,et al.  Multiple conformations of E. coli Hsp90 in solution: insights into the conformational dynamics of Hsp90. , 2008, Structure.

[65]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  RosettaLigand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.