Regional-scale impacts of Phase I of the Clean Air Act Amendments in the USA: the relation between emissions and concentrations, both wet and dry

Abstract A comparison of data records in the 1990s, both before (1991–1994) and after (1995–1997) implementation of Phase I of the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990 for the eastern US, shows a significant reduction in SO2 emissions for most states, except for Texas, North Carolina, Illinois, Florida, and Alabama. However, of the major NOx emitting states, only two eastern states (New York and Pennsylvania) show significant declines in NOx. A pattern of large declines in SO2 emissions (>20%) after CAAA implementation, and large declines in precipitation SO42− and H+, as well as air concentrations of SO2 and SO42− (components of dry deposition), exists for most regions of the eastern US. In most cases, the emission/concentration relations are close to 1 : 1 when the source region based on 15-h back trajectories is used for the New England region, and source regions based on 9-h back trajectories are used for the six other eastern US regions that were studied. The southern Appalachian Mountain region, an acid-sensitive area receiving high levels of acidic deposition, has not seen an appreciable improvement in precipitation acidity. This area has also shown the least improvement in wet and dry sulfur concentrations, of the areas examined. Precipitation base cations (Ca2+ and Mg2+) show a pattern of either increasing or level concentrations when comparing 1990–1994 to 1995–1998 data, for six of the seven regions examined. Ammonium concentrations have generally changed 15%.

[1]  J. Shannon.  Regional trends in wet deposition of sulfate in the United States and SO2 emissions from 1980 through 1995 , 1999 .

[2]  G. Likens,et al.  Comparison of Long-Term Precipitation Chemistry Measurements at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire , 2000 .

[3]  J. D. Gordon.  External quality-assurance results for the National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network, 1995-96 , 1999 .

[4]  R. Draxler.  An Overview of the HYSPLIT_4 Modelling System for Trajectories, Dispersion, and Deposition , 1998 .

[5]  M. Mast,et al.  Long‐term trends in stream water and precipitation chemistry at five headwater basins in the northeastern United States , 1999 .

[6]  T. Butler,et al.  The impact of changing regional emissions on precipitation chemistry in the eastern United States , 1991 .

[7]  J. D. Gordon,et al.  The precision of wet atmospheric deposition data from national atmospheric deposition program/national trends network sites determined with collocated samplers , 1994 .

[8]  B. Stunder.  An Assessment of the Quality of Forecast Trajectories , 1996 .

[9]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Steep declines in atmospheric base cations in regions of Europe and North America , 1994, Nature.

[10]  A. Stein,et al.  The sensitivity of sulfur wet deposition to atmospheric oxidants , 2000 .

[11]  William N. Rom,et al.  Environmental and occupational medicine , 1983 .

[12]  Estimation of Trends in Atmospheric Concentrations of Sulfate in the Northeastern United States. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[13]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Acid Rain: Response and Recovery of a Forest Ecosystem , 1996, Science.

[14]  T. Willoughby,et al.  External quality-assurance results for the National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network during 1988 , 1990 .

[15]  J. Lynch,et al.  Trends in precipitation chemistry in the United States: A national perspective, 1980–1992 , 1995 .

[16]  G. Likens,et al.  The biogeochemistry of calcium at Hubbard Brook , 1998 .

[17]  W. Fricke,et al.  Indications for changing deposition patterns in central Europe. , 1992, Environmental pollution.

[18]  O. Lorain,et al.  Potential of freezing in wastewater treatment: soluble pollutant applications. , 2001, Water research.

[19]  Donald F. Charles,et al.  Acidic Deposition and Aquatic Ecosystems , 1991, Springer New York.

[20]  G. Likens,et al.  Weekly and daily precipitation chemistry network comparisons in the eastern U.S.: NADP/NTN vs MAP3S/AIRMoN , 1998 .

[21]  L. Husain,et al.  The relationship between regional SO2 emissions and downwind aerosol sulfate concentrations in the northeastern US. , 2000 .

[22]  R. Smith,et al.  Trends in wet and dry deposition of sulphur in the United Kingdom , 1995 .

[23]  J. Lynch,et al.  Changes in sulfate deposition in eastern USA following implementation of Phase I of Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. , 2000 .

[24]  P. Dillon,et al.  Ten-year trends in sulphate, nitrate and hydrogen deposition in central Ontario , 1988 .

[25]  David M. Holland,et al.  Trends in atmospheric sulfur and nitrogen species in the eastern United States for 1989–1995 , 1998 .

[26]  G. Likens,et al.  Atmospheric dust and acid rain , 1996 .

[27]  G. Likens,et al.  Long- and short-term changes in sulfate deposition: Effects of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments , 2001 .