Benefits and costs of street trees in Lisbon, Portugal

It is well known that urban trees produce various types of benefits and costs. The computer tool i-Tree STRATUM helps quantify tree structure and function, as well as the value of some of these tree services in different municipalities. This study describes one of the first applications of STRATUM outside the U.S. Lisbon’s street trees are dominated by Celtis australis L., Tilia spp., and Jacaranda mimosifolia D. Don, which together account for 40% of the 41,247 trees. These trees provide services valued at $8.4 million annually, while $1.9 million is spent in their maintenance. For every $1 invested in tree management, residents receive $4.48 in benefits. The value of energy savings ($6.20/tree), CO2 reduction ($0.33/tree) and air pollutant deposition ($5.40/tree) were comparable to several other U.S. cities. The large values associated with stormwater runoff reduction ($47.80/tree) and increased real estate value ($144.70/tree) were substantially greater than values obtained in U.S. cities. Unique aspects of Lisbon’s urban morphology and improvement programs are partially responsible for these differences.

[1]  C. Konijnendijk The Forest and the City: The Cultural Landscape of Urban Woodland , 2008 .

[2]  L. M. Anderson,et al.  Influence of Trees on Residential Property Values in Athens, Georgia (U.S.A. ) : A Survey based on Actual Sales Prices , 1988 .

[3]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Ecology, planning, and management of urban forests: international perspectives. , 2008 .

[4]  Qingfu Xiao,et al.  Municipal Forest Benefits and Costs in Five US Cities , 2005 .

[5]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  Development and application of an urban tree air quality score for photochemical pollution episodes using the Birmingham, United Kingdom, area as a case study. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  William N. Cannon,et al.  The Esthetic Contribution of Trees to Residential Streets in Ohio Towns , 1983, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[7]  M. Lefsky,et al.  Urban forest biomass estimates: is it important to use allometric relationships developed specifically for urban trees? , 2009, Urban Ecosystems.

[8]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Brooklyn's urban forest , 2002 .

[9]  C. Fang,et al.  Guidance for noise reduction provided by tree belts , 2005 .

[10]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  City of Berkeley, California Municipal Tree Resource Analysis , 2005 .

[11]  Cecil C. Konijnendijk,et al.  Urban Forests and Trees , 2005 .

[12]  R. Ulrich Human responses to vegetation and landscapes , 1986 .

[13]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Chicago's urban forest ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. (Includes executive summary). Forest Service general technical report (Final) , 1994 .

[14]  Sunset Books,et al.  Sunset Western Garden Book , 1998 .

[15]  Hashem Akbari,et al.  Cooling our Communities. A Guidebook on Tree Planting and Light-Colored Surfacing - eScholarship , 2009 .

[16]  L. Tyrväinen Monetary valuation of urban forest amenities in Finland. , 1999 .

[17]  J. E. Wagner,et al.  Analyzing the efficacy of subtropical urban forests in offsetting carbon emissions from cities , 2010 .

[18]  Paul H. Gobster,et al.  Managing urban and high-use recreation settings. , 1993 .

[19]  Susan L. Ustin,et al.  Winter rainfall interception by two mature open‐grown trees in Davis, California , 2000 .

[20]  S. Pauleit,et al.  Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning , 2000 .

[21]  Danilo J. Santini,et al.  MONETARY VALUES OF AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS IN VARIOUS U.S. REGIONS , 1995 .

[22]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[23]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Equations for Predicting Diameter, Height, Crown Width, and Leaf Area of San Joaquin Valley Street Trees , 2001, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[24]  N. A. Richards,et al.  Diversity and stability in a street tree population , 1983 .

[25]  D. Pearce The Social Cost of Carbon and its Policy Implications , 2003 .

[26]  E. Mcpherson,et al.  Predictive Equations for Dimensions and Leaf Area of Coastal Southern California Street Trees , 2001, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[27]  J. Simpson,et al.  A comparison of municipal forest benefits and costs in Modesto and Santa Monica, California, USA , 2002 .

[28]  James R. Simpson,et al.  Air Pollutant Uptake by Sacramento's Urban Forest , 1998, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[29]  R. Rowntree,et al.  Using Structural Measures to Compare Twenty-Two U.S. Street Tree Populations , 1989, Landscape Journal.