Ranking the ability of wheat varieties to compete with Lolium rigidum

The relative competitive advantage of 12 commercially available wheat varieties was examined against Lolium rigidum Gaud. at a number of sites from 1995 to 1997 in south-eastern Australia. Nearly all the variation in crop grain yield was attributable to the variety x environment effects (81%), with only 4% due to variety x weed x environment effects. Some varieties exhibited an environment-specific competitive advantage, for example Katunga, Dollarbird and Hartog, whereas others like Shrike, Rosella and Janz were relatively poorly competitive in some situations. The introduction of greater genetic variability into wheat is required to significantly increase competitiveness. Alternatively, manipulating crop agronomy, such as increasing crop seeding rate, may be a practical alternative. The grain yield of weed-free wheat was highly positively correlated with grain yield of the weedy plots, suggesting that local adaptation is important for strong competitiveness, and that wheat breeders in southern Australia may be inadvertently selecting for competitive advantage with weeds when selecting for other traits such as early vigour. The varieties which showed competitive yield advantage also suppressed L. rigidum. A combination of short-term agronomic manipulations and a longer-term breeding effort is needed for increasing wheat competitiveness, and the increasing importance of herbicide-resistant weeds may facilitate this process.

[1]  R. Balyan,et al.  Competitive Ability of Winter Wheat Cultivars with Wild Oat (Avena ludoviciana) , 1991, Weed Science.

[2]  V. A. Johnson,et al.  Competition Between Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cultivars and Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum) , 1986, Weed Science.

[3]  J. Zadoks A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals , 1974 .

[4]  M. Boersma,et al.  The use of a doubled haploid population to investigate the relationship between crop morphological traits and competitiveness with weeds. , 1999 .

[5]  Deirdre Lemerle,et al.  Genetic improvement and agronomy for enhanced wheat competitiveness with weeds , 2001 .

[6]  G. P. Seavers,et al.  Crop canopy development and structure influence weed suppression , 1999 .

[7]  B. Verbeek,et al.  The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds , 1996 .

[8]  R. Roush,et al.  Herbicide resistance in weeds of southern Australia: why are we the worst in the world? , 1999 .

[9]  Robert E. Blackshaw,et al.  Differential competitive ability of winter wheat cultivars against downy brome , 1994 .

[10]  G. Wicks Herbicide Applications on Wheat and Stubble for No‐Tillage Corn1 , 1986 .

[11]  J. Pratley,et al.  Evaluation of seedling allelopathy in 453 wheat (Triticum aestivum) accessions against annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) by the equal-compartment-agar method , 2000 .

[12]  Mokhtari,et al.  Seasonal and site variability in the tolerance of wheat cultivars to interference from Lolium rigidum , 1998 .

[13]  Greg J. Rebetzke,et al.  Genetic improvement of early vigour in wheat , 1999 .

[14]  R. Murison,et al.  The influence of wheat density and spatial arrangement on annual ryegrass, Lolium rigidum Gaudin, competition , 1985 .

[15]  R. E. Blackshaw,et al.  Effect of Seeding Dates and Densities of Green Foxtail (Setaria viridis) on the Growth and Productivity of Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum) , 1981, Weed Science.

[16]  Christopher Preston,et al.  Herbicide resistance: Impact and management , 1996 .

[17]  P. Hucl,et al.  Genotypic variation for competitive ability in spring wheat. , 1996 .

[18]  Svend Christensen,et al.  Crop weed competition and herbicide performance in cereal species and varieties , 1994 .

[19]  A. Appleby,et al.  Winter Wheat Yield Reduction from Interference by Italian Ryegrass1 , 1976 .

[20]  G. Wicks,et al.  Impact of Wheat Cultivars on Establishment and Suppression of Summer Annual Weeds 1 , 1986, Agronomy Journal.