Purposes of AAC device use for persons with ALS as reported by caregivers

Thirty-four informal caregivers who support 26 persons with ALS reported on AAC technology use. Each caregiver completed the Communication Device Use Checklist, a survey tool developed for this study based on Light's () classification of the purposes of social interaction (Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66 – 82). The checklist includes 17 purposes of communication and asks participants to judge importance, mode, and frequency of use for each purpose. Results show that the three communication purposes used most frequently and valued as important by caregivers involve regulating the behavior of others for basic needs and wants (getting needs met; giving instructions or directions to others; and clarifying needs). Consistent reports of use and frequency for the purposes of staying connected (social closeness) and discussing important issues (information transfer) indicate that AAC technology can assist the dyad in maintaining previous relationships. The face-to-face spontaneous conversation mode is used most frequently, despite the slow rate of production, the lack of permanence, and the demands on conversational partners during message generation. Clinical and research implications are discussed.

[1]  A. Chiò,et al.  A cross sectional study on determinants of quality of life in ALS , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[2]  Laura J. Ball,et al.  Acceptance of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Technology by Persons with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , 2004 .

[3]  K. Abe Fatigue and depression are associated with poor quality of life in ALS , 2004, Neurology.

[4]  Joan Murphy "I Prefer Contact This Close": Perceptions of AAC by People with Motor Neurone Disease and their Communication Partners , 2004 .

[5]  Orla Hardiman,et al.  Assessing individual quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[6]  Daniel S. Newman,et al.  Augmentative and Alternative Communication in ALS , 2003 .

[7]  Laura J. Ball,et al.  Attitudes Toward Communication Modes and Message Formulation Techniques Used for Storytelling by People with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , 2003 .

[8]  Robert G. Miller,et al.  Clinical characteristics and management of ALS. , 2001, Seminars in neurology.

[9]  Janice C Light,et al.  “Don't give up”: Employment experiences of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who use augmentative and alternative communication , 2001 .

[10]  M. Doyle,et al.  Trends in augmentative and alternative communication use by individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2001 .

[11]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disorders , 2000 .

[12]  C. Armon,et al.  Linear estimates of rates of disease progression as predictors of survival in patients with ALS entering clinical trials 1 Presented in part at the 8th International Symposium on ALS/MND held in Glasgow, Scotland, November 3–5th, 1997. 1 , 1998, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[13]  Hiroshi Mitsumoto,et al.  Home care of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) 1 This material was presented as a platform presentation at the 7th International Symposium on ALS/MND in Chicago, IL, 12 November 1996. 1 , 1997, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[14]  The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale. Assessment of activities of daily living in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The ALS CNTF treatment study (ACTS) phase I-II Study Group. , 1996, Archives of neurology.

[15]  Alison T. O'Brien,et al.  Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of dementia caregiving: prevalence, correlates, and causes. , 1995, The Gerontologist.

[16]  Janice Light,et al.  Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions , 1988 .

[17]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .