Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Angiography in the Evaluation of Stenosis in Lower Limbs: Comparison Between Visual Score and Quantitative Analysis Using a Semiautomated 3D Software

Objective To assess the accuracy of a semiautomated 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomographic angiography software in the evaluation of lower limb stenoses compared to reader evaluation, using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as standard of reference. Materials and Methods Forty patients with peripheral vascular occlusive disease underwent both DSA and computed tomographic angiography. The vascular tree was divided into 6 segments from distal aorta to popliteal artery. Each district was evaluated for significant stenosis by one experienced vascular radiologist (on axial as well as 3D images) and by a semiautomated 3D software analysis, independently. Evaluation of the vessel evaluation was then repeated by a poorly experienced radiologist twice, first without 3D software analysis and then supported by 3D software analysis. Results Both experienced radiologist and automated evaluations obtained high statistical results when compared to DSA. The analysis by poorly experienced radiologist obtained lower statistical results, which significantly improved when supported by 3D software analysis. Conclusions Three-dimensional analysis software should be feasible to identify significant vascular stenoses and may help a poorly experienced radiologist to significantly improve diagnostic accuracy.

[1]  M. D’Onofrio,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy in Coronary Stenosis: Comparison Between Visual Score and Quantitative Analysis (Quantitative Computed Tomographic Angiography) in Coronary Angiography by Multidetector Computed Tomography-Coronary Angiography and Quantitative Analysis (Quantitative Coronary Angiography) in Conve , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  A. Fox,et al.  Reproducibility of Semi-Automated Measurement of Carotid Stenosis on CTA , 2010, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[3]  A. Stadler,et al.  Multidetector CT angiography in the assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: accuracy in detecting the severity, number, and length of stenoses , 2008, European Radiology.

[4]  P. Schnyder,et al.  Assessment of occlusive arterial disease of abdominal aorta and lower extremities arteries: value of multidetector CT angiography using an adaptive acquisition method , 2008, European Radiology.

[5]  G. Hunter,et al.  Increasing Contrast Agent Concentration Improves Enhancement in First-Pass CT Perfusion , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[6]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Semi-automatic level-set based segmentation and stenosis quantification of the internal carotid artery in 3D CTA data sets , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  T. Rand,et al.  Automated CTA Quantification of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Pilot Trial , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[8]  R. Vanninen,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: reproducibility of automated 3D CT angiography analysis method , 2004, European Radiology.

[9]  T. Flohr,et al.  Multislice CT angiography , 2001, European Radiology.

[10]  D. Katz,et al.  CT angiography of the lower extremities and aortoiliac system with a multi-detector row helical CT scanner: promise of new opportunities fulfilled. , 2001, Radiology.

[11]  G D Rubin,et al.  Multi-detector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience. , 2001, Radiology.

[12]  Weiner Sd,et al.  Peripheral arterial disease. Medical management in primary care practice. , 2001, Geriatrics.

[13]  G. Rubin,et al.  MR and spiral/helical CT imaging of lower extremity occlusive disease. , 1995, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[14]  A. AbuRahma,et al.  Complications of arteriography in a recent series of 707 cases: Factors affecting outcome , 1993, Annals of vascular surgery.

[15]  L. Soinne,et al.  CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  J. Vacek,et al.  Catheter-based methods for managing peripheral vascular disease. Which types of occlusive disease are most amenable? , 1999, Postgraduate medicine.

[17]  P. Reimer,et al.  Non-invasive vascular imaging of peripheral vessels , 1998, European Radiology.

[18]  J R Waugh,et al.  Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. , 1992, Radiology.

[19]  E. Barrett-Connor,et al.  TABLE 1 Prevalence of PAD by traditional assessment : intermittent claudication and pulse palpation % Claudication % Pulse abnormalities Rose Femoral Posterior Dorsalis n Rose , 2005 .