The spatiotemporal sequencing of everyday activities in the large-scale environment

Abstract Choices of where to carry out everyday activities in large-scale environments were conceptualized as a process of forming ‘travel plans’, and, to test a model of how such plans are formed, three experimental simulations of a planning task were performed in the laboratory. In Experiment 1, subjects (high school students) were found to choose a shortest route to travel between a number of actual, familiar locations in a town by first choosing the order between the locations that minimized straight-line (Euclidean) distances, then choosing the shortest paths between the locations in the constrained order. The order choices were, in Experiment 2, found to be made by minimizing distance locally rather than globally, except in some cases when ‘spatial configurations’ of the locations were discovered. Both the results of this experiment and of Experiment 3 suggested that such discoveries were facilitated by a simultaneous representation of the locations which was possible when they were positions on a display, committed to short-term memory or available for perceptual inspection, but to a less extent when they were actual locations.

[1]  S. Hanson.  The importance of the multi-purpose journey to work in urban travel behavior , 1980 .

[2]  G W Evans,et al.  Cognitive mapping: knowledge of real-world distance and location information. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[3]  E. Sadalla,et al.  Reference points in spatial cognition. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[4]  R. W. Bacon.  An Approach to the Theory of Consumer Shopping Behaviour , 1971 .

[5]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Spatial orientation and wayfinding in the designed environment: A conceptual analysis and some suggestions for postoccupancy evaluation. , 1986 .

[6]  E. Lindberg,et al.  Cognitive Mapping of Large-Scale Environments , 1984 .

[7]  Martin Cadwallader,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Consumer Spatial Decision Making , 1975 .

[8]  S. Kosslyn.  Image and mind , 1982 .

[9]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[10]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Human Behavior and Environment , 1977, Springer US.

[11]  Irwin N. Jankovic,et al.  Principles of spatial problem solving. , 1982 .

[12]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[13]  David V. Canter,et al.  The Purposive Evaluation of Places , 1983 .

[14]  E Lindberg,et al.  Memory for spatial location in two-dimensional arrays. , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[15]  R. C. Sherman,et al.  Verifying environmental relationships , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[16]  R. Finke.  Levels of equivalence in imagery and perception. , 1980 .

[17]  John C. Baird,et al.  Children as Environmental Planners , 1978 .

[18]  Tony E. Smith,et al.  A choice theory of spatial interaction , 1975 .

[19]  M. Cadwallader.  Towards a cognitive gravity model: The case of consumer spatial behaviour , 1981 .

[20]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  A Cognitive Model of Planning , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Richard W. Olshavsky,et al.  Perceptual maps of supermarket locations. , 1975 .

[22]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  ESTIMATING SHOPPING DESTINATION CHOICE MODELS FROM TRAVEL DIARY DATA , 1983 .

[23]  Hillel J. Einhorn,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making , 1982 .