Smaller, faster stomata: scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance

Maximum and minimum stomatal conductance, as well as stomatal size and rate of response, are known to vary widely across plant species, but the functional relationship between these static and dynamic stomatal properties is unknown. The objective of this study was to test three hypotheses: (i) operating stomatal conductance under standard conditions (g op) correlates with minimum stomatal conductance prior to morning light [g min(dawn)]; (ii) stomatal size (S) is negatively correlated with g op and the maximum rate of stomatal opening in response to light, (dg/dt)max; and (iii) g op correlates negatively with instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUE) despite positive correlations with maximum rate of carboxylation (Vc max) and light-saturated rate of electron transport (J max). Using five closely related species of the genus Banksia, the above variables were measured, and it was found that all three hypotheses were supported by the results. Overall, this indicates that leaves built for higher rates of gas exchange have smaller stomata and faster dynamic characteristics. With the aid of a stomatal control model, it is demonstrated that higher g op can potentially expose plants to larger tissue water potential gradients, and that faster stomatal response times can help offset this risk.

[1]  James F. Reynolds,et al.  Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2 , 1992 .

[2]  H. Jones,et al.  Plants and Microclimate. , 1985 .

[3]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity , 1979, Nature.

[4]  E. Schulze,et al.  Relationships among Maximum Stomatal Conductance, Ecosystem Surface Conductance, Carbon Assimilation Rate, and Plant Nitrogen Nutrition: A Global Ecology Scaling Exercise , 1994 .

[5]  N. Phillips,et al.  Interspecific variation in nighttime transpiration and stomatal conductance in a mixed New England deciduous forest. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[6]  G. Katul,et al.  Effects of stomatal delays on the economics of leaf gas exchange under intermittent light regimes. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[7]  P. Franks,et al.  Plasticity in maximum stomatal conductance constrained by negative correlation between stomatal size and density: an analysis using Eucalyptus globulus. , 2009, Plant, cell & environment.

[8]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  An improved dynamic model of photosynthesis for estimation of carbon gain in sunfleck light regimes , 1997 .

[9]  T. Brodribb,et al.  Evolution of stomatal responsiveness to CO(2) and optimization of water-use efficiency among land plants. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[10]  Ernst-Detlef Schulze,et al.  Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis , 1995, Springer Study Edition.

[11]  G. Riechers.  Plants and Microclimate , 1984 .

[12]  W. Ehrler.  Periodic Nocturnal Stomatal Opening of Citrus in a Steady Environment , 1971 .

[13]  D. Grantz,et al.  Stomatal response to humidity in sugarcane and soybean : effect of vapour pressure difference on the kinetics of the blue light response , 1990 .

[14]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Photosynthetic physiology of eucalypts along a sub-continental rainfall gradient in northern Australia , 2011 .

[15]  A. Sõber,et al.  Leaf anatomical characteristics associated with shoot hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance and stomatal sensitivity to changes of leaf water status in temperate deciduous trees , 2001 .

[16]  P. Groom.  Seedling growth and physiological responses of two sandplainBanksia species differing in flood tolerance , 2004 .

[17]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[18]  Thomas D. Sharkey,et al.  Photosynthesis in intact leaves of C3 plants: Physics, physiology and rate limitations , 2008, The Botanical Review.

[19]  F. Woodward,et al.  The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change , 2003, Nature.

[20]  F. Meinzer.  Functional convergence in plant responses to the environment , 2002, Oecologia.

[21]  C. Körner,et al.  Leaf Diffusive Conductances in the Major Vegetation Types of the Globe , 1995 .

[22]  T. Lawson,et al.  Photosynthesis and Stomatal Behaviour , 2010 .

[23]  W. Knorr,et al.  Quantifying photosynthetic capacity and its relationship to leaf nitrogen content for global‐scale terrestrial biosphere models , 2009 .

[24]  M. Barbour,et al.  The stomatal response to evaporative demand persists at night in Ricinus communis plants with high nocturnal conductance. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[25]  D. Grantz,et al.  Stomatal responses to light and leaf-air water vapor pressure difference show similar kinetics in sugarcane and soybean. , 1986, Plant physiology.

[26]  J. Pate,et al.  Hydraulic architecture and xylem structure of the dimorphic root systems of South-West Australian species of Proteaceae , 1995 .

[27]  T. Brodribb,et al.  Leaf Maximum Photosynthetic Rate and Venation Are Linked by Hydraulics1[W][OA] , 2007, Plant Physiology.

[28]  I. R. Cowan.  Stomatal Behaviour and Environment , 1978 .

[29]  Thomas M. Hinckley,et al.  Water relations of drought hardy shrubs: osmotic potential and stomatal reactivity , 1980 .

[30]  J. Richards,et al.  Nighttime Stomatal Conductance and Transpiration in C3 and C4 Plants1[W] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[31]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  The Mechanical Diversity of Stomata and Its Significance in Gas-Exchange Control[OA] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[32]  J. Fisher,et al.  Nighttime transpiration in woody plants from contrasting ecosystems. , 2007, Tree physiology.

[33]  Philip K. Groom,et al.  Long-term changes in vigour and distribution of Banksia and Melaleuca overstorey species on the Swan Coastal Plain , 2001 .

[34]  K. Snyder,et al.  Night-time conductance in C3 and C4 species: do plants lose water at night? , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[35]  R. Benyon,et al.  Nighttime water use in an irrigated Eucalyptus grandis plantation. , 1999, Tree physiology.

[36]  M. Lechowicz,et al.  The ecological and functional correlates of nocturnal transpiration. , 2007, Tree physiology.

[37]  P. Franks.  Higher rates of leaf gas exchange are associated with higher leaf hydrodynamic pressure gradients. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[38]  Stan D. Wullschleger,et al.  Biochemical Limitations to Carbon Assimilation in C3 Plants—A Retrospective Analysis of the A/Ci Curves from 109 Species , 1993 .

[39]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Responses to Humidity by Stomata of Nicotiana glauca L. And Corylus avellana L. Are Consistent With the Optimization of Carbon Dioxide Uptake With Respect to Water Loss , 1980 .

[40]  Frederick C. Meinzer,et al.  Mechanisms contributing to seasonal homeostasis of minimum leaf water potential and predawn disequilibrium between soil and plant water potential in Neotropical savanna trees , 2005, Trees.

[41]  Todd E. Dawson,et al.  Seasonal water uptake and movement in root systems of Australian phraeatophytic plants of dimorphic root morphology: a stable isotope investigation , 1996, Oecologia.

[42]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  On the economy of plant form and function. , 1988 .

[43]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves , 1981, Planta.

[44]  N. McDowell,et al.  Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? , 2008, The New phytologist.

[45]  D. Whitehead,et al.  Nocturnal stomatal conductance and implications for modelling δ18O of leaf-respired CO2 in temperate tree species. , 2005, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[46]  M. Riederer,et al.  Ecophysiological relevance of cuticular transpiration of deciduous and evergreen plants in relation to stomatal closure and leaf water potential. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[47]  P. Groom.  Seedling water stress response of two sandplain Banksia species differing in ability to tolerate drought , 2002 .

[48]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  Dependence of the Extent and Direction of Average Stomatal Response in Zea mays L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L. on the Frequency of Fluctuations in Environmental Stimuli , 1994, Plant physiology.

[49]  J. Turner,et al.  Influence of groundwater depth on the seasonal sources of water accessed by Banksia tree species on a shallow, sandy coastal aquifer , 2002, Oecologia.

[50]  D. Beerling,et al.  CO2‐forced evolution of plant gas exchange capacity and water‐use efficiency over the Phanerozoic , 2009, Geobiology.

[51]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Correlations Between Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Climate of Native Habitats for Diverse Eucalypt Taxa Growing in a Common Garden , 1996 .

[52]  Gabriel G. Katul,et al.  Nocturnal evapotranspiration in eddy-covariance records from three co-located ecosystems in the Southeastern U.S.: Implications for annual fluxes , 2009 .

[53]  G. Farquhar,et al.  A relationship between humidity response, growth form and photosynthetic operating point in C3 plants , 1999 .