NP Animacy Identification for Anaphora Resolution

In anaphora resolution for English, animacy identification can play an integral role in the application of agreement restrictions between pronouns and candidates, and as a result, can improve the accuracy of anaphora resolution systems. In this paper, two methods for animacy identification are proposed and evaluated using intrinsic and extrinsic measures. The first method is a rule-based one which uses information about the unique beginners in WordNet to classify NPs on the basis of their animacy. The second method relies on a machine learning algorithm which exploits a WordNet enriched with animacy information for each sense. The effect of word sense disambiguation on the two methods is also assessed. The intrinsic evaluation reveals that the machine learning method reaches human levels of performance. The extrinsic evaluation demonstrates that animacy identification can be beneficial in anaphora resolution, especially in the cases where animate entities are identified with high precision.

[1]  Carl Pollard,et al.  A Centering Approach to Pronouns , 1987, ACL.

[2]  Daniel Marcu,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Relation Between Discourse Structure and Co-Reference , 2000, COLING.

[3]  Jerry R. Hobbs,et al.  Pronoun resolution , 1977, SGAR.

[4]  R. Mark Sirkin,et al.  Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1994 .

[5]  Michel J. Denber,et al.  A utomatic Resolution of Anaphora in English , 1998 .

[6]  Walter Daelemans,et al.  TiMBL : Tilburg Memory-Based Learner version 6 . 3 Reference Guide ILK Technical Report – ILK 1001 , 1999 .

[7]  Philip Resnik,et al.  Disambiguating Noun Groupings with Respect to Wordnet Senses , 1995, VLC@ACL.

[8]  Timo Järvinen,et al.  A non-projective dependency parser , 1997, ANLP.

[9]  金田 重郎,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning (書評) , 1995 .

[10]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Building Semantic Concordances , 1998 .

[11]  Jan Svartvik,et al.  A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .

[12]  Karen Sparck Jones,et al.  Book Reviews: Evaluating Natural Language Processing Systems: An Analysis and Review , 1996, CL.

[13]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning , 1992 .

[14]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[15]  Richard Evans,et al.  A New, Fully Automatic Version of Mitkov's Knowledge-Poor Pronoun Resolution Method , 2002, CICLing.

[16]  Eugene Charniak,et al.  Getting Useful Gender Statistics from English Text , 1998 .

[17]  Claire Gardent,et al.  Improving Machine Learning Approaches to Coreference Resolution , 2002, ACL.

[18]  Branimir Boguraev,et al.  Anaphora for Everyone: Pronominal Anaphora Resolution without a Parser , 1996, COLING.

[19]  Ruslan Mitkov,et al.  Robust Pronoun Resolution with Limited Knowledge , 1998, ACL.

[20]  Walter Daelemans,et al.  TiMBL: Tilburg Memory-Based Learner , 2007 .

[21]  R. Burchfield.  Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[22]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[23]  Walter Daelemans,et al.  TiMBL: Tilburg Memory-Based Learner, version 2.0, Reference guide , 1998 .

[24]  Thomas G. Dietterich.  What is machine learning? , 2020, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[25]  Claire Cardie,et al.  Noun Phrase Coreference as Clustering , 1999, EMNLP.

[26]  Ruslan Mitkov,et al.  Automatic Anaphora Resolution: Limits, Impediments, and Ways Forward , 2002, PorTAL.

[27]  Shalom Lappin,et al.  An Algorithm for Pronominal Anaphora Resolution , 1994, CL.

[28]  Constantin Orasan,et al.  Improving anaphora resolution by identifying animate entities in texts , 2002 .