Physical models at increasing scale and role of theoretical / numerical back-analyses

In spite of advancements in the techniques for the study of thermo-hydro-chemomechanical behaviour of geomaterials at the REV scale, the latter might not provide an exhaustive picture of transport processes in soil, when non-linear coupling terms arise, and when scale effects are expected. To overcome the difficulties associated with this issue, physical models, in which relevant coupled fields may be tracked in time, can be developed. Most often, theoretical and / or numerical models must accompany the interpretation of the physical test, to exploit all the information provided by measurements. In this chapter a few examples of increasing complexity are briefly presented to discuss this viewpoint and to show the potentialities provided by physical models aided by theoretical and numerical interpretation in the comprehension of coupled behaviour.

[1]  Olaf A. Cirpka,et al.  Fully coupled hydrogeophysical inversion of a laboratory salt tracer experiment monitored by electrical resistivity tomography , 2012 .

[2]  A. Binley,et al.  Quantitative imaging of solute transport in an unsaturated and undisturbed soil monolith with 3‐D ERT and TDR , 2008 .

[3]  D. LaBrecque,et al.  Small‐Scale Electrical Resistivity Tomography of Wet Fractured Rocks , 2004, Ground water.

[4]  A. Lloret,et al.  Thermo-hydraulic characterisation of soft rock by means of heating pulse tests , 2009 .

[5]  J. R. Philip,et al.  Moisture movement in porous materials under temperature gradients , 1957 .

[6]  Jon F. Harrington,et al.  Gas migration in clay barriers , 1999 .

[7]  Antonio Lloret,et al.  Advances on the knowledge of the thermo-hydro-mechanical behaviour of heavily compacted “FEBEX” bentonite , 2007 .

[8]  A. Amorim Thermo-hydro-mechanical behaviour of two deep Belgium clay formations: Boom and ypresian clays , 2011 .

[9]  P. Marschall,et al.  Characterization of gas flow through low-permeability claystone: laboratory experiments and two-phase flow analyses , 2014 .

[10]  Cesare Comina,et al.  Electrical Tomography as laboratory monitoring tool , 2010 .

[11]  Sebastiano Foti,et al.  Estimation of the hydraulic parameters of unsaturated samples by electrical resistivity tomography , 2012 .

[12]  Sebastià Olivella Pastallé,et al.  Numerical formulation for a simulator (CODE_BRIGHT) for the coupled analysis of saline media , 1996 .

[13]  Dante Fratta,et al.  Development and validation of a low-cost electrical resistivity tomographer for soil process monitoring , 2009 .

[14]  Wlodek Tych,et al.  Characterizing solute transport in undisturbed soil cores using electrical and X-ray tomographic methods , 1999 .

[15]  Cesare Comina,et al.  EIT Oedometer : An Advanced Cell to Monitor Spatial and Time Variability in Soil with Electrical and Seismic Measurements , 2008 .

[16]  Eduardo Alonso,et al.  Gas flow through clay barriers , 2008 .

[17]  P. Milly,et al.  A Simulation Analysis of Thermal Effects on Evaporation From Soil , 1984 .

[18]  Eduardo Alonso,et al.  Gas injection tests on sand/bentonite mixtures in the laboratory. Experimental results and numerical modelling , 2008 .

[19]  A. Binley,et al.  Vadose zone flow model parameterisation using cross-borehole radar and resistivity imaging , 2001 .

[20]  Enrique Romero,et al.  Air Tests on Low-Permeability Claystone Formations. Experimental Results and Simulations , 2013 .

[21]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Saline tracer visualized with three‐dimensional electrical resistivity tomography: Field‐scale spatial moment analysis , 2005 .

[22]  A. Gens,et al.  Nonisothermal multiphase flow of brine and gas through saline media , 1994 .

[23]  K. Pruess,et al.  TOUGH2 User's Guide Version 2 , 1999 .

[24]  Antonio Gens,et al.  Heating pulse tests under constant volume on Boom clay , 2010 .

[25]  B. Nicoullaud,et al.  Spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content with an irrigated corn crop cover using surface electrical resistivity tomography , 2003 .

[26]  Douglas LaBrecque,et al.  Bench-scale experiments to evaluate electrical resistivity tomography as a monitoring tool for geologic CO2 sequestration , 2012 .

[27]  Van Genuchten,et al.  A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils , 1980 .

[28]  Jon F. Harrington,et al.  Gas migration in KBS-3 buffer bentonite. Sensitivity of test parameters to experimental boundary conditions , 2003 .

[29]  A. Binley,et al.  Examination of Solute Transport in an Undisturbed Soil Column Using Electrical Resistance Tomography , 1996 .

[30]  S. Foti,et al.  3D-electrical resistivity tomography monitoring of salt transport in homogeneous and layered soil samples , 2011 .

[31]  Alberto Ledesma,et al.  Backanalysis of thermohydraulic bentonite properties from laboratory tests , 2002 .

[32]  R. H. Brooks,et al.  Hydraulic properties of porous media , 1963 .