The Representation of Tools in Left Parietal Cortex Is Independent of Visual Experience

Tool use depends on processes represented in distinct regions of left parietal cortex. We studied the role of visual experience in shaping neural specificity for tools in parietal cortex by using functional magnetic resonance imaging with sighted, late-blind, and congenitally blind participants. Using a region-of-interest approach in which tool-specific areas of parietal cortex were identified in sighted participants viewing pictures, we found that specificity in blood-oxygen-level-dependent responses for tools in the left inferior parietal lobule and the left anterior intraparietal sulcus is independent of visual experience. These findings indicate that motor- and somatosensory-based processes are sufficient to drive specificity for representations of tools in regions of parietal cortex. More generally, some aspects of the organization of the dorsal object-processing stream develop independently of the visual information that forms the major sensory input to that pathway in sighted individuals.

[1]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[2]  M. Brett,et al.  Actions Speak Louder Than Functions: The Importance of Manipulability and Action in Tool Representation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  K. Zilles,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of the primate isocortical motor system , 2000, Anatomy and Embryology.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Tim Shallice,et al.  The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: an FMRI study. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Action-Related Properties Shape Object Representations in the Ventral Stream , 2007, Neuron.

[7]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Category-Specific Organization in the Human Brain Does Not Require Visual Experience , 2009, Neuron.

[8]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Joseph S. Gati,et al.  Visually-guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas , 2010 .

[10]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  No double-dissociation between optic ataxia and visual agnosia: Multiple sub-streams for multiple visuo-manual integrations , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  F. Rösler,et al.  The human dorsal action control system develops in the absence of vision. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Asymmetric fMRI adaptation reveals no evidence for mirror neurons in humans , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[15]  J. Hermsdörfer,et al.  Neural representations of pantomimed and actual tool use: Evidence from an event-related fMRI study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[17]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[19]  Scott H. Johnson-Frey The neural bases of complex tool use in humans , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Cortical topography of human anterior intraparietal cortex active during visually guided grasping. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single‐subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self‐organizing group independent component analysis , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[22]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  G. Goldenberg Apraxia and the parietal lobes , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[26]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  C Dohle,et al.  Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension , 1998, Neurology.

[28]  K. Heilman,et al.  Two forms of ideomotor apraxia , 1982, Neurology.

[29]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects , 2004, NeuroImage.