Effects of movement duration and visual feedback on visual and proprioceptive components of prism adaptation.

While looking through laterally displacing prisms, subjects pointed sagittally 80 times at an objectively straight-ahead target, completing a reciprocal out-and-back pointing movement ever 1, 3, or 6 s. Visual feedback was available early in the pointing movement or only late at the end of the movement. Aftereffect measures of adaptive shift (obtained after every 10 pointing trials) showed adaptive change only in limb position sense (i.e., proprioceptive adaptation) when movement duration was 1 s, regardless of visual feedback condition; but as movement duration increased, adaptive change in the eye position sense (i.e., visual adaptation) increased while proprioceptive adaptation decreased, especially for the late visual feedback condition. Regardless of visual feedback condition, proprioceptive adaptation showed the maximal rate of growth with the 1-s movement duration, whereas visual adaptation showed maximal growth with the 6-s movement duration. These results provide additional support for a model of adaptive spatial mapping in which the direction of strategically flexible coordination (guidance) between eye and limb (and consequently the locus of adaptive spatial mapping) is jointly determined by movement duration and timing of visual feedback. An additional effect of movement duration is to determine the rate of discordant inputs. Maximal growth of adaptation occurs when the input rate matches the response time of the spatial mapping function.

[1]  G. M. Redding,et al.  Effects of Pointing Rate and Availability of Visual Feedback on Visual and Proprioceptive Components of Prism Adaptation. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  G. M. Redding,et al.  Sources of “overadditivity” in prism adaptation , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  B Wallace,et al.  Adaptive coordination and alignment of eye and hand. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  L. K. Canon,et al.  Influence of concurrent and terminal exposure conditions on the nature of perceptual adaptation. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Gordon M. Redding,et al.  Chapter 5 Adaptive Eye-Hand Coordination: Implications of Prism Adaptation for Perceptual-Motor Organization , 1992 .

[6]  R B Welch,et al.  Evidence for a three-component model of prism adaptation. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  B Wallace,et al.  Components of prism adaptation in terminal and concurrent exposure: Organization of the eye-hand coordination loop , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  C. S. Harris,et al.  Beware of the Straight-Ahead Shift—A Nonperceptual Change in Experiments on Adaptation to Displaced Vision , 1974, Perception.

[9]  B Wallace,et al.  Effects on prism adaptation of duration and timing of visual feedback during pointing. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  B Wallace,et al.  Adaptive mechanisms in perceptual-motor coordination: components of prism adaptation. , 1988, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  R. Welch Perceptual modification : adapting to altered sensory environments / Robert B. Welch , 1978 .