Impact of optokinetic stimulation on mental arithmetic

Solving arithmetic problems has been shown to induce shifts of spatial attention, subtraction problems orienting attention to the left side, and addition problems to the right side of space. At the neurofunctional level, the activations elicited by the solving of arithmetical problems resemble those elicited by horizontal eye movements. Whether overt orientation of attention (i.e., eye movements) can be linked to the solving procedure is, however, still under debate. In the present study, we used optokinetic stimulation (OKS) to trigger automatic eye movements to orient participants’ overt attention to the right or to the left of their visual field while they were solving addition or subtraction problems. The results show that, in comparison to leftward OKS and a control condition, rightward OKS facilitates the solving of addition problems that necessitate a carrying procedure. Subtraction solving was unaffected by leftward or rightward OKS. These results converge with previous findings to show that attentional shifts are functionally related to mental arithmetic processing.

[1]  P. Halligan,et al.  The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disorders in patients with an acute right or left hemisphere stroke. , 1993, Age and ageing.

[2]  M. McCourt,et al.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Influence of gaze observation on random number generation. , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[4]  Koleen McCrink,et al.  Operational momentum in large-number addition and subtraction by 9-month-olds. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[5]  Jo-Anne LeFevre,et al.  Selection of procedures in mental subtraction. , 2006, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[6]  Jason B Mattingley,et al.  Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  G. Fink,et al.  Recovery from hemineglect: Differential neurobiological effects of optokinetic stimulation and alertness training , 2009, Cortex.

[8]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Left to right: Representational biases for numbers and the effect of visuomotor adaptation , 2008, Cognition.

[9]  A. Cangelosi,et al.  Ocular drift along the mental number line , 2016, Psychological Research.

[10]  Xinlin Zhou,et al.  Dynamic mental number line in simple arithmetic , 2016, Psychological research.

[11]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Interactions between perceptual and numerical space , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  Cognitive bias induced by visuo‐motor adaptation to prisms: a simulation of unilateral neglect in normal individuals? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[13]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Horizontal visual motion modulates focal attention in left unilateral spatial neglect. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  John C. Marshall,et al.  When Right Goes Left: An Investigation of Line Bisection in a Case of Visual Neglect , 1989, Cortex.

[15]  Jenni A Ogden,et al.  Anterior-posterior interhemispheric differences in the loci of lesions producing visual hemineglect , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  J. Marshall,et al.  Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Visuospatial priming of the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[18]  M Raab,et al.  Moving your Eyes to Solution: Effects of Movements on the Perception of a Problem-Solving Task , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Jamie I. D. Campbell Handbook of mathematical cognition , 2004 .

[20]  Giuseppe Iaria,et al.  Neglecting the Left Side of a City Square but Not the Left Side of Its Clock: Prevalence and Characteristics of Representational Neglect , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Neglect Impairs Explicit Processing of the Mental Number Line , 2022 .

[22]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Attentional Bias Induced by Solving Simple and Complex Addition and Subtraction Problems , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  B. Laeng,et al.  Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of the same visual scene , 2002 .

[24]  K. Priftis,et al.  Optokinetic Stimulation Modulates Neglect for the Number Space: Evidence from Mental Number Interval Bisection , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[25]  Susana Ruiz Fernández,et al.  Number magnitude determines gaze direction: Spatial–numerical association in a free-choice task , 2011, Cortex.

[26]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Normal and Impaired Reflexive Orienting of Attention after Central Nonpredictive Cues , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Catherine Thevenot,et al.  Running the number line: Rapid shifts of attention in single-digit arithmetic , 2016, Cognition.

[28]  T. Loetscher,et al.  Eye position predicts what number you have in mind , 2010, Current Biology.

[29]  F. Mast,et al.  Spatial biases during mental arithmetic: evidence from eye movements on a blank screen , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[30]  C. Marquardt,et al.  Repetitive optokinetic stimulation induces lasting recovery from visual neglect. , 2006, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[31]  G. Bottini,et al.  In search of the disappeared half of it: 35 years of studies on representational neglect. , 2014, Neuropsychology.

[32]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  M. Pesenti,et al.  Duration and numerical estimation in right brain-damaged patients with and without neglect: Lack of support for a mental time line. , 2016, British journal of psychology.

[34]  L. Stark,et al.  Spontaneous Eye Movements During Visual Imagery Reflect the Content of the Visual Scene , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[36]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Spatial Interferences in Mental Arithmetic: Evidence from the Motion–Arithmetic Compatibility Effect , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  V. Michel,et al.  Recruitment of an Area Involved in Eye Movements During Mental Arithmetic , 2009, Science.

[38]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention , 2007, Cognition.

[39]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  Impairments of the mental number line for two-digit numbers in neglect , 2008, Cortex.

[40]  Jean-François Bonnefon,et al.  Eye movements disrupt spatial but not visual mental imagery , 2014, Cognitive Processing.

[41]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: Evidence from the operational momentum effect , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[42]  Michael Andres,et al.  Causal role of spatial attention in arithmetic problem solving: Evidence from left unilateral neglect , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  Georg Kerkhoff,et al.  Modulation and rehabilitation of spatial neglect by sensory stimulation. , 2003, Progress in brain research.

[44]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[45]  K. Heilman,et al.  Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task , 1980, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  Georgios A. Pavlopoulos,et al.  A reference guide for tree analysis and visualization , 2010, BioData Mining.

[47]  Oliver Lindemann,et al.  Operational momentum in numerosity production judgments of multi-digit number problems , 2011 .

[48]  G. Antonucci,et al.  Effect of Optokinetic Stimulation in Patients with Visual Neglect , 1990, Cortex.

[49]  Tyler Marghetis,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Doing Arithmetic by Hand: Hand Movements during Exact Arithmetic Reveal Systematic, Dynamic Spatial Processing , 2022 .

[50]  Wim Fias,et al.  Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[51]  M. Johansson,et al.  Look Here, Eye Movements Play a Functional Role in Memory Retrieval , 2014, Psychological science.

[52]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  Counting Is Easier while Experiencing a Congruent Motion , 2013, PloS one.

[53]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Interference of lateralized distractors on arithmetic problem solving: a functional role for attention shifts in mental calculation , 2016, Psychological research.

[54]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Can Approximate Mental Calculation Account for Operational Momentum in Addition and Subtraction? , 2022 .

[55]  C Luzzatti,et al.  Unilateral neglect, representational schema and consciousness. , 1979, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  Wim Fias,et al.  The Heterogeneous Nature of Number–Space Interactions , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[57]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Subtraction by addition , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[58]  C. Semenza,et al.  Leftward motion restores number space in neglect , 2009, Cortex.

[59]  M. Pesenti,et al.  Spatial bias in symbolic and non-symbolic numerical comparison in neglect , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[60]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Walking boosts your performance in making additions and subtractions , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[61]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Moving along the Number Line: Operational Momentum in Nonsymbolic Arithmetic , 2006 .

[62]  C. Spence,et al.  The Modulation of Haptic Line Bisection by a Visual Illusion and Optokinetic Stimulation , 2007, Perception.

[63]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  Prism adaptation improves representational neglect , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  D. Geary,et al.  Simple and complex mental subtraction: strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in younger and older adults. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[65]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Voluntary eye movements direct attention on the mental number space , 2016, Psychological research.

[66]  Y. Rossetti,et al.  Simulating unilateral neglect in normals using prism adaptation: implications for theory , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[67]  Roger Johansson,et al.  Pictures and Spoken Descriptions Elicit Similar Eye Movements During Mental Imagery, Both in Light and in Complete Darkness , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[68]  J. Binder,et al.  Distinct syndromes of hemineglect. , 1992, Archives of neurology.

[69]  K. Priftis,et al.  Larger, smaller, odd or even? Task-specific effects of optokinetic stimulation on the mental number space , 2015 .

[70]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[71]  M. Hartmann Numbers in the eye of the beholder: What do eye movements reveal about numerical cognition? , 2015, Cognitive Processing.

[72]  Steffen Zitzmann,et al.  Examining the Presence and Determinants of Operational Momentum in Childhood , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[73]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  The Number Space and Neglect , 2004, Cortex.

[74]  M. Ashcraft Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory , 1992, Cognition.

[75]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  The middle house or the middle floor: Bisecting horizontal and vertical mental number lines in neglect , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[76]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Unilateral Neglect of Representational Space , 1978, Cortex.

[77]  F. Mast,et al.  Counting is a spatial process: evidence from eye movements , 2016, Psychological research.

[78]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.