Using taxonomic data to assess and monitor biodiversity: are the tribes still fighting?

In this article we review the problems encountered during the use of taxonomic information for the purpose of monitoring biodiversity. These problems encompass the nature of taxonomic data that requires human interpretation in order to be recognised in the field and grouped into well-defined classes such as species. We then briefly discuss some methods that may be utilized in order to minimise these problems.

[1]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  How reliable is the monitoring of permanent vegetation plots? A test with multiple observers , 2007 .

[2]  James B. Stribling,et al.  Determining the quality of taxonomic data , 2003, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[3]  A. Magurran,et al.  Measuring Biological Diversity , 2004 .

[4]  D. Rocchini,et al.  Quantifying species richness at multiple spatial scales in a Natura 2000 network , 2008 .

[5]  Alessandro Chiarucci,et al.  Using Vascular Plants as a Surrogate Taxon to Maximize Fungal Species Richness in Reserve Design , 2005 .

[6]  E. Mayr Animal Species and Evolution , 1964 .

[7]  J. Timberlake,et al.  How Taxonomists Can Bridge the Gap Between Taxonomy and Conservation Science , 2003 .

[8]  Stefano Mazzoleni,et al.  Measuring beta-diversity from taxonomic similarity , 2007 .

[9]  Thomas J. Stohlgren,et al.  Measuring plant diversity , 2006 .

[10]  P. Taberlet,et al.  DNA barcoding for ecologists. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  A. Dubois A partial but radical solution to the problem of nomenclatural taxonomic inflation and synonymy load , 2008 .

[12]  Jan Lepš,et al.  How reliable are our vegetation analyses , 1992 .

[13]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness , 2001 .

[14]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  Discovering and rediscovering the sample-based rarefaction formula in the ecological literature , 2008 .

[15]  P. Nimis A tale from Bioutopia , 2001, Nature.

[16]  S. Knapp Species concepts and floras: what are species for? , 2008 .

[17]  Randall T Ryti,et al.  Effect of the Focal Taxon on the Selection of Nature Reserves. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[18]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  Quantifying plant species diversity in a Natura 2000 network: Old ideas and new proposals , 2008 .

[19]  Marco Ferretti,et al.  Design concepts adopted in long-term forest monitoring programs in Europe--problems for the future? , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Jan Pergl,et al.  Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  Njb Isaac,et al.  Response to Agapow and Sluys: the reality of taxonomic change (correspondence) , 2005 .

[22]  J. Fridman,et al.  Observer bias and random variation in vegetation monitoring data , 2008 .

[23]  James Mallet,et al.  Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  E. Froufe,et al.  Taxonomic inflation: species concept or historical geopolitical bias? , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  Alessandro Chiarucci,et al.  Is vascular plant species diversity a predictor of bryophyte species diversity in Mediterranean forests? , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[26]  Sandra Knapp,et al.  Taxonomic inflation, species concepts and global species lists. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  C. Elzinga,et al.  Monitoring Plant and Animal Populations , 2001 .

[28]  P. Agapow,et al.  The reality of taxonomic change. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.