Marking the Turn: Obligation, Engagement, and Alienation in Group Discussions

In group conversations, not speaking is the state of affairs experienced by most people most of the time; I refer to this as ‘‘conversational latency.’’ Hypothesizing that conversational latency affects one’s discursive options, I analyze the association between latency (operationalized as the number of turns that elapsed since the current speaker last spoke) and turn-initial words (e.g., but, oh) in twenty-nine experimental task groups, taking turn-initial words as indicators of the type of content a speaker proposes to produce. The findings suggest a model of group conversation in which conversational obligations weigh heaviest on the shoulders of the most recent contributors; those who contributed somewhat less recently remain engaged but have more latitude to take discordant positions; and those who have been quiet for longer periods are susceptible to ‘‘alienation from topic,’’ as a result of which reentry is often accompanied by an attempt to change the topic.

[1]  J. Atkinson,et al.  A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement , 1985 .

[2]  Andrei Popescu-Belis,et al.  What are discourse markers ? , 2003 .

[3]  Lisa Troyer,et al.  Social structure and the duration of social acts , 1999 .

[4]  E. Schegloff.  Sequence Organization in Interaction: Contents , 2007 .

[5]  R. Bales.  A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. , 1950 .

[6]  D. Maynard.  Placement of topic changes in conversation , 1980 .

[7]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .

[8]  David R. Gibson.  Participation Shifts: Order and Differentiation in Group Conversation , 2003 .

[9]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  INTERRUPTIONS IN GROUP DISCUSSIONS: THE EFFECTS OF GENDER AND GROUP COMPOSITION* , 1989 .

[10]  M. Wohlrab-Sahr,et al.  Interaction ritual chains , 2006 .

[11]  David R. Gibson.  How the Outside Gets In: Modeling Conversational Permeation , 2008 .

[12]  David R. Gibson.  Seizing the Moment: The Problem of Conversational Agency* , 2000 .

[13]  R. Bales,et al.  Channels of communication in small groups. , 1951 .

[14]  Jody Clay-Warner,et al.  Effects of authority structures and gender on interaction in same-sex task groups , 1996 .

[15]  Josef C. Schrock,et al.  Discourse Markers in Spontaneous Speech: Oh What a Difference an Oh Makes , 1999 .

[16]  Cecilia E. Ford,et al.  Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the mana , 1996 .

[17]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[18]  P J Burke,et al.  Participation and leadership in small groups. , 1974, American sociological review.

[19]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction , 1972 .

[20]  B. McClendon.  The analysis of residuals , 1967 .

[21]  S. Vuchinich.  Sequencing and social structure in family conflict. , 1984 .

[22]  Gary Alan Fine,et al.  Small Groups and Culture Creation: The Idioculture of Little League Baseball Teams , 1979 .

[23]  David R. Gibson.  Opportunistic Interruptions: Interactional Vulnerabilities Deriving From Linearization , 2005 .

[24]  David R. Gibson.  Taking Turns and Talking Ties: Networks and Conversational Interaction1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  Julian F. Henriques.  Changing the Subject , 1998 .

[26]  J. Skvoretz.  Models of participation in status-differentiated groups. , 1988 .

[27]  R. Z. Norman,et al.  Participation in Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Groups: A Theoretical Integration , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  E. Schegloff.  Discourse as an interactional achievement : Some uses of "Uh huh" and other things that come between sentences , 1982 .

[29]  R. Field.  Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management , 1989 .

[30]  Geoffrey Raymond.  Prompting Action: The Stand-Alone "So" in Ordinary Conversation , 2004 .

[31]  Lynn Smith-Lovin,et al.  THE GENDER SYSTEM AND INTERACTION , 1999 .

[32]  J. Berger,et al.  Performance Expectations and Behavior in Small Groups , 1969 .

[33]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  Jean Aitchison.  The Language Web: The Power and Problem of Words - The 1996 BBC Reith Lectures , 1996 .

[35]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Changing the Subject: Gender, Status, and the Dynamics of Topic Change , 2001 .

[36]  E. Schegloff.  Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation , 1993 .

[37]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[38]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Lectures on Conversation , 1995 .

[39]  Marina Sbisà,et al.  Speech act theory , 2009 .

[40]  Monica J. Turk.  Using and in Conversational Interaction , 2004 .

[41]  G. Simmel.  The sociology of Georg Simmel , 1950 .

[42]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Status and Participation in Six-Person Groups: A Test of Skvoretz's Comparative Status Model , 1986 .

[43]  S. Haberman.  The Analysis of Residuals in Cross-Classified Tables , 1973 .

[44]  E. Schegloff.  Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  Cecilia E. Ford,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns , 1996 .

[46]  M. Wish,et al.  Speech act theory in quantitative research on interpersonal behavior , 1985 .

[47]  I. Janis.  Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policymaking and Crisis Management , 1989 .

[48]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .