A review of resource needs in postgraduate studies

The desire to pursue higher education is constantly increasing. The government and the institutions of higher learning are striving to attract more students, especially at the graduate level by making every effort to provide quality education. Some scholars proposed that the strategic success of a service organization depends on its ability to consistently meet or exceed customer service expectations. Students as institutions' customer, need information and support to cope in balancing the demands of the different environments. One of the major problems facing by the higher education nowadays is attrition and completion rates. To manage this issue, a constant effort should be made. The resources offered by the institution determine the ability of the institution to manage their students effectively. The main thrust of this paper is to provide the relevent input for resource development in institutional of higher education. It is hoped to assist the institution to identify and address implementation issues related to postgraduate studies. The major contribution of this review is the guideline for effective resource and in developing distinguished human capital.

[1]  Geoffrey N. Soutar,et al.  Measuring service quality in a tertiary institution , 1996 .

[2]  A. Levine,et al.  Collegiate Life: An Obituary. , 1998 .

[3]  John Hattie,et al.  Performance Indicators in Education , 1990 .

[4]  D. Pugh,et al.  How to Get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and Their Supervisors , 1994 .

[5]  Catherine Manathunga,et al.  The development of research supervision: “Turning the light on a private space” , 2005 .

[6]  Madeleine Atkins,et al.  Effective Teaching in Higher Education , 1989 .

[7]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  Mostly True Confessions: Joint Meaning-Making about the Thesis Journey , 2000 .

[8]  Josef Frischer,et al.  Laissez-faire in research education — an inquiry into a Swedish doctoral program , 2000 .

[9]  Firdaus Abdullah The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector , 2006 .

[10]  L. Lomas,et al.  Students’ perceptions of quality in higher education , 2003 .

[11]  Firdaus Abdullah Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF , 2006 .

[12]  Jacquelin Mackinnon,et al.  Academic Supervision: seeking metaphors and models for quality , 2004 .

[13]  Chris M. Golde Should I Stay or Should I Go? Student Descriptions of the Doctoral Attrition Process , 2000 .

[14]  Leo J. Brueckner,et al.  Supervision : a social process , 1955 .

[15]  Yew May Martin,et al.  Postgraduate completion rates , 1999 .

[16]  Diljit Singh,et al.  Information needs of international students at a Malaysian University , 2006 .

[17]  Ingrid Moses,et al.  Supervision of Higher Degree Students — Problem Areas and Possible Solutions , 1984 .

[18]  Janne Malfroy,et al.  Doctoral supervision, workplace research and changing pedagogic practices , 2005 .

[19]  Kathryn S. Whitaker,et al.  The Restructuring Handbook: A Guide to School Revitalization , 1993 .

[20]  Chandrasekharan Rajendran,et al.  Customer perceptions of service quality: A critique , 2001 .

[21]  Fred Galloway,et al.  The Adjustment Problems Faced by International Students in the United States: A Comparison of International Students and Administrative Perceptions at Two Private, Religiously Affiliated Universities , 2005 .

[22]  Elaine Aspinwall,et al.  TQM in higher education ‐ a review , 1997 .

[23]  John F. Dalrymple,et al.  Developing alternative perspectives for quality in higher education , 2003 .

[24]  Ian Winchester,et al.  Supervision of Graduate Students , 1995 .

[25]  S. Volet Learning across cultures: appropriateness of knowledge transfer , 1999 .

[26]  Janet Gail Donald,et al.  Graduate student supervision policies and procedures: A case study of issues and factors affecting graduate study , 1995 .

[27]  Elinor L. Katz,et al.  Key Players in the Dissertation Process , 1997 .

[28]  Samia Mohamed Malik Information needs of foreign women in Malaysia, with special reference to the Sudanese community / Samia Mohamed Malik. , 2000 .

[29]  J. Haworth,et al.  Emblems of Quality in Higher Education: Developing and Sustaining High-Quality Programs , 1996 .

[30]  John Hockey,et al.  Establishing Boundaries: problems and solutions in managing the PhD supervisor's role , 1994 .

[31]  Yoo-Seong Song International business students: a study on their use of electronic library services , 2004 .

[32]  Lin Lin,et al.  From scholarship student to responsible scholar: a transformative process , 2005 .

[33]  Glenda Kruss,et al.  Students’ Experience of Postgraduate Supervision at the University of the Western Cape , 1998 .

[34]  S. P. Van Tonder,et al.  Patchwork text: Innovative assessment to address the diverse neds of postgraduate learners at the African University of the 21st century , 2010 .

[35]  Felix T Mavondo,et al.  Student Satisfaction with Tertiary Institution and Recommending it to Prospective Students , 2000 .

[36]  G. Becker,et al.  Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Third Edition , 1993 .

[37]  F. King Alexander,et al.  The Changing Face of Accountability , 2000 .

[38]  Daniel McLaughlin,et al.  Naming Silenced Lives: Personal Narratives and Processes of Educational Change , 1993 .

[39]  R. H Spear,et al.  Supervision of research students: responding to student expectations , 2000 .

[40]  Judith S. Eaton Distance Education Is On Your Doorstep. , 1999 .

[41]  Barbara Pamphilon,et al.  More than a confessional: postmodern groupwork to support postgraduate supervisors' professional development , 2004 .

[42]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: an integrative framework for action and research , 2006 .

[43]  Sue Johnston,et al.  Supporting Educational Researchers of the Future. , 1996 .

[44]  Adee Athiyaman,et al.  Linking student satisfaction and service quality perceptions: the case of university education , 1997 .

[45]  Barbara E. Lovitts,et al.  Being a good course‐taker is not enough: a theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research , 2005 .

[46]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: Implications , 1994 .

[47]  N. Lessing,et al.  The supervision of research for dissertations and theses , 2004 .

[48]  Philip T. Dunwoody,et al.  Why Students Withdraw from Classes , 1995 .

[49]  Salome Schulze,et al.  Postgraduate supervision and academic support: students' perceptions , 2002 .

[50]  Edith DiDomenico,et al.  Assessing Service Quality within the Educational Environment , 1996 .

[51]  G. West,et al.  Teaching and Technology in Higher Education: Changes and Challenges , 1999 .

[52]  Stefan Lagrosen,et al.  Examination of the dimensions of quality in higher education , 2004 .

[53]  H. Dean Nielsen,et al.  Quality Assessment and Quality Assurance in Distance Teacher Education , 1997 .

[54]  Peter McCarthy,et al.  Recognising difference: Providing for postgraduate students , 1999 .