Dreams, Strategies and Systems: Portraits of assessment past, present and future

Systems of testing and assessment are shaped in part by personalities and institutions who pursue research insights and technical innovations. Out of these they fashion 'dreams' which drive their efforts to improve these systems. This paper develops this perspective, whilst acknowledging that it overlaps with and complements analyses of assessment systems from social and cultural perspectives. Four different examples are considered. Two from past and current history are the growth, from an origin in IQ testing, of standardised multiple choice tests and the dream of raising standards by external testing. The other two, nascent with their influence yet to be determined, are the dream of improvement by formative assessment and the dream that recent developments in psychology can provide a basis for new and improved assessment practices.

[1]  P. Moss,et al.  Bias in test use. , 1989 .

[2]  Michael Young,et al.  The Rise of the Meritocracy , 1958 .

[3]  James W. Pellegrino,et al.  Addressing the "Two Disciplines" Problem: Linking Theories of Cognition and Learning With Assessment and Instructional Practice , 1957 .

[4]  Patricia Broadfoot,et al.  Education, assessment, and society : a sociological analysis , 1996 .

[5]  Assessment-Based Reform: Challenges to Educational Measurement. , 1994 .

[6]  E. Bredo.  Reconstructing educational psychology: Situated cognition and Deweyian pragmatism , 1994 .

[7]  Paul Black,et al.  Policy Perils of International Comparisons: The TIMSS Case. , 1997 .

[8]  Robert J. Mislevy,et al.  Test Theory for A New Generation of Tests , 1994 .

[9]  Jo Boaler,et al.  Experiencing School Mathematics: Teaching Styles, Sex, and Setting , 1997 .

[10]  Jay P. Heubert,et al.  High stakes : testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation , 1999 .

[11]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[12]  Kim Baker,et al.  Assessment of teaching and learning in “literature-based” classrooms , 1995 .

[13]  R. Linn.  Assessments and Accountability , 2000 .

[14]  P. Black.  Formative and Summative Assessment by Teachers , 1993 .

[15]  Pamela Owen,et al.  Curriculum and Assessment Issues: Messages for Teachers. Children Learning To Read: International Concerns, Volume 2. , 1995 .

[16]  Robert J. Mislevy,et al.  TEST THEORY RECONCEIVED , 1994 .

[17]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Changing assessments : alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction , 1994 .

[18]  Robert Glaser,et al.  Instructional technology and the measurement of learing outcomes: Some questions. , 1963 .

[19]  Desmond L. Nuttall.  Assessing educational achievement , 1986 .

[20]  Reflections on the implementation of National Curriculum Science Policy for the 5‐14 age range: findings and interpretations from a national evaluation study in England , 1995 .

[21]  R. Snow,et al.  Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. , 1989 .

[22]  L. Cronbach.  The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .

[23]  Harry Torrance,et al.  Assessment and Testing: A Survey of Research , 1993 .

[24]  D. Sadler.  Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[25]  Rick Morgan,et al.  ANALYSES OF THE PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF THE SAT® AND HIGH SCHOOL GRADES FROM 1976 TO 1985 , 1989 .

[26]  Robert J. Mislevy,et al.  FOUNDATIONS OF A NEW TEST THEORY , 1982 .

[27]  E. Holmes.  What Is And What Might Be , 1912 .

[28]  P. Black.  Learning, League Tables and National Assessment: opportunity lost or hope deferred? , 1998 .

[29]  J. Cone.  Testing testing: Social consequences of the examined life. , 1996 .

[30]  H. Gardner.  Multiple intelligences : the theory in practice , 1993 .

[31]  J. Murphy,et al.  Policy-Making in Elementary Education 1870-1895 , 1974 .

[32]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[33]  D. Oldroyd.  Inheriting shame: The story of eugenics and racism in America , 2001 .

[34]  B. Gillham.  Reconstructing Educational Psychology , 2022 .

[35]  Robert L. Linn,et al.  Comparing State and District Test Results to National Norms: The Validity of Claims That “Everyone Is Above Average” , 1990 .

[36]  A. Alton-Lee,et al.  Assessing Classroom Learning: How Students Use Their Knowledge and Experience to Answer Classroom Achievement Test Questions in Science and Social Studies , 1995 .

[37]  Douglas J. Hacker,et al.  Metacognition in educational theory and practice. , 1998 .

[38]  M. Young.  The rise of the meritocracy, 1870-2033 : the new elite of our social revolution , 1959 .

[39]  R. Slavin.  Reforming State and Federal Policies to Support Adoption of Proven Practices , 1996 .

[40]  M. Linn,et al.  Beyond Fourth-Grade Science: Why Do U.S. and Japanese Students Diverge? , 2000 .