Gender differences in middle grade science achievement: Subject domain, ability level, and course emphasis

This study used base-year data from a large and nationally representative data base (NELS:88) to identify some important explanatory factors for gender differences in science performance. Middle school science classes were selected for study because students have little choice over their coursework at this level. By separating a standardized test of general science achievement into its life science and physical science domains, we documented a large advantage for boys on the subtest of physical science and a modest advantage for girls in life science. Importantly, in physical science, the disadvantage for girls is more pronounced for the most able students. Explanations for these gender difference focus on laboratory experience. Only about 25% of eighth graders' science classes provide laboratory experiences at least weekly, and these experiences are more common in stand-alone middle schools enrolling more affluent students. Such laboratory experiences are especially beneficial for girls' achievement in physical science, but not boys'. We conclude that these results argue for increasing experiential and hands-on learning in middle school science classes—particularly in the physical sciences—as a means to promote gender equity in science achievement at this important educational level. The study has implications for the underrepresentation of women in physical science careers. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  L. Wilkinson,et al.  Gender Influences in Classroom Interaction , 1985 .

[2]  J. Stanley,et al.  Sex differences in mathematical ability: fact or artifact? , 1980, Science.

[3]  Carolyn Hopp,et al.  Gender Comparisons of Mathematics Attitudes and Affect: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[4]  J. Stanley,et al.  Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: more facts. , 1983, Science.

[5]  Martin L. Maehr,et al.  Gender Differences in Motivational Orientations Toward Achievement in School Science: A Quantitative Synthesis , 1984 .

[6]  Myra Sadker,et al.  Sexism in the Classroom: From Grade School to Graduate School. , 1986 .

[7]  Barbara S. Spector,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Middle School Students' Perceptions of Factors Facilitating the Learning of Science: Grounded Theory and Existing Theory. , 1991 .

[8]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Windows into Science Classrooms: Problems Associated with Higher-Level Cognitive Learning. , 1990 .

[9]  M. Hallinan,et al.  ABILITY GROUPING AND SEX DIFFERENCES IN MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT , 1987 .

[10]  Lynn Friedman,et al.  Mathematics and the Gender Gap: A Met-Analysis of Recent Studies on Sex Differences in Mathematical Tasks , 1989 .

[11]  Betsy Jane Becker,et al.  Gender and Science Achievement: A Reanalysis of Studies from Two Meta-Analyses. , 1989 .

[12]  E. Lenney,et al.  Sex differences in self-confidence: The influence of comparison to others' ability level , 1983 .

[13]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  What does it mean to be an exemplary science teacher , 1990 .

[14]  Martin L. Maehr,et al.  Affect, Ability, and Science Achievement: A Quantitative Synthesis of Correlational Research , 1983 .

[15]  J. Sherman,et al.  Predicting Mathematics Performance in High School Girls and Boys , 1979 .

[16]  Elizabeth W. Haven FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SELECTION OF ADVANCED ACADEMIC MATHEMATICS COURSES BY GIRLS IN HIGH SCHOOL , 1972 .

[17]  R. Yager,et al.  The Search for Excellence in Science Education. , 1983 .

[18]  J. Meece,et al.  Socialization of Achievement Attitudes and Beliefs: Classroom Influences. , 1982 .

[19]  J. Meece,et al.  Sex Differences in Math Achievement: Toward a Model of Academic Choice. , 1982 .

[20]  Camilla Persson Benbow,et al.  Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students , 1991 .

[21]  M. Kimball A new perspective on women's math achievement. , 1989 .

[22]  P. Campbell What's a Nice Girl Like You Doing in a Math Class?. , 1986 .

[23]  B M Vetter,et al.  Women scientists and engineers: trends in participation. , 1981, Science.

[24]  Jane Butler Kahle,et al.  The myth of equality in science classrooms , 1983 .

[25]  E. Fennema,et al.  Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Linear probability, logit and probit models , 1984 .

[27]  Betty M. Vetter Demographics of the Engineering Student Pipeline. , 1988 .

[28]  E. Lenney What's fine for the gander isn't always good for the goose: Sex differences in self-confidence as a function of ability area and comparison with others , 1981 .

[29]  Ronald D. Anderson,et al.  SCIENCE TEACHER CHARACTERISTICS BY TEACHER BEHAVIOR AND BY STUDENT OUTCOME: A META-ANALYSIS OF RESEARCH , 1983 .

[30]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Gender Differences in Math Ability: The Impact of Media Reports on Parents , 1985 .

[31]  J. Steve Oliver,et al.  A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students , 1990 .

[32]  T. E. Smith,et al.  Gender Differences in the Scientific Achievement of Adolescents: Effects of Age and Parental Separation , 1992 .

[33]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Gender differences in teacher‐student interactions in science classrooms , 1990 .

[34]  Jane Butler Kahle,et al.  An assessment of the impact of science experiences on the career choices of male and female biology students , 1985 .

[35]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Effective Teaching, Student Engagement in Classroom Activities, and Sex-Related Differences in Learning Mathematics , 1985 .

[36]  J. Becker Differential Treatment of Females and Males in Mathematics Classes , 1981 .

[37]  A. Reynolds The middle schooling process: influences on science and mathematics achievement from the longitudinal study of American youth. , 1991, Adolescence.

[38]  W. LeBold,et al.  A Comparison of Men and Women Undergraduate and Professional Engineers. , 1981 .