Bayesian approaches to multiple sources of evidence and uncertainty in complex cost‐effectiveness modelling

Increasingly complex models are being used to evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of medical interventions. We describe the multiple sources of uncertainty that are relevant to such models, and their relation to either probabilistic or deterministic sensitivity analysis. A Bayesian approach appears natural in this context. We explore how sensitivity analysis to patient heterogeneity and parameter uncertainty can be simultaneously investigated, and illustrate the necessary computation when expected costs and benefits can be calculated in closed form, such as in discrete‐time discrete‐state Markov models. Information about parameters can either be expressed as a prior distribution, or derived as a posterior distribution given a generalized synthesis of available data in which multiple sources of evidence can be differentially weighted according to their assumed quality. The resulting joint posterior distributions on costs and benefits can then provide inferences on incremental cost‐effectiveness, best presented as posterior distributions over net‐benefit and cost‐effectiveness acceptability curves. These ideas are illustrated with a detailed running example concerning the cost‐effectiveness of hip prostheses in different age–sex subgroups. All computations are carried out using freely available software for conducting Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  David Draper,et al.  Assessment and Propagation of Model Uncertainty , 2011 .

[2]  A O'Hagan,et al.  A framework for cost-effectiveness analysis from clinical trial data. , 2001, Health economics.

[3]  A O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian cost‐effectiveness analysis from clinical trial data , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  D G Fryback,et al.  AN ELEMENTARY INTRODUCTION TO BAYESIAN COMPUTING USING WINBUGS , 2001, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[5]  A H Briggs,et al.  A BAYESIAN APPROACH TO STOCHASTIC COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS , 2001, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[6]  David R. Jones,et al.  Hierarchical models in generalized synthesis of evidence: an example based on studies of breast cancer screening. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  Alex J. Sutton,et al.  Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research , 2000 .

[8]  M C Weinstein,et al.  Representing Both First- and Second-order Uncertainties by Monte Carlo Simulation for Groups of Patients , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[9]  L B Russell,et al.  Modelling for cost-effectiveness analysis. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  A Gafni,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of azithromycin for preventing Mycobacterium avium complex infection in HIV-positive patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. The Swiss HIV Cohort Study. , 1999, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[11]  A. Gray,et al.  Handling uncertainty in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions , 1999 .

[12]  G. Bevan,et al.  An economic model to estimate the relative costs over 20 years of different hip prostheses. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[13]  R Dekker,et al.  Correlations in Uncertainty Analysis for Medical Decision Making , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[14]  A J Moskowitz,et al.  Bayesian estimation of cost-effectiveness ratios from clinical trials. , 1999, Health economics.

[15]  K Claxton,et al.  Bayesian approaches to the value of information: implications for the regulation of new pharmaceuticals. , 1999, Health economics.

[16]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Migraine Headache Treatments: Combining Information from Heterogeneous Designs , 1999 .

[17]  K A Cronin,et al.  Assessing uncertainty in microsimulation modelling with application to cancer screening interventions. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  A P Grieve,et al.  Issues for statisticians in pharmaco-economic evaluations. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  Daniel T. Larose,et al.  Grouped random effects models for Bayesian meta-analysis. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  A Briggs,et al.  Commentary: Markov models of medical prognosis , 1997, BMJ.

[21]  Andrew M. Wilson,et al.  An introduction to second‐order random variables in human health risk assessments , 1996 .

[22]  D W Murray,et al.  Long-term comparison of Charnley and Stanmore design total hip replacements. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  G. Bentley,et al.  Stanmore compared with Charnley total hip replacement. A prospective study of 413 arthroplasties. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  D J Spiegelhalter,et al.  Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: a comparative study. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  A Laupacis,et al.  The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  E. Chelimsky,et al.  Cross-design Synthesis: A New Form of Meta-analysis for Combining Results from Randomized Clinical Trials and Medical-practice Databases , 1993, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[27]  Russell V. Lenth,et al.  MeWAnalysis by the Confidence Profile Method: The Statistical Synthesis of Evidence , 1993 .

[28]  Karl Claxton,et al.  Bayesian approaches to technology assessment and decision making , 2001 .

[29]  K Claxton,et al.  Introduction. Bayesian approaches to technology assessment and decision making. , 2001, International journal of technology assessment in health care.

[30]  A. Culyer,et al.  Effectiveness of hip prostheses in primary total hip replacement: a critical review of evidence and an economic model. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[31]  A. Carr,et al.  Primary total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review of outcomes and modelling of cost-effectiveness associated with different prostheses. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[32]  P Herberts,et al.  Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978-1990. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.