Contribution of vertebral deformities to chronic back pain and disability

Among 2992 white women aged 65–70 years recruited from population‐based listings, we measured radiographic vertebral dimensions of T5–L4 and calculated ratios of heights: anterior/posterior, mid/posterior, and posterior/posterior of either adjacent vertebra. The degree of deformity for each vertebra was analyzed in terms of the number of standard deviations (SD) that ratio differed from the mean ratio calculated for the same vertebral level in this population. We correlated the severity of each woman's worst vertebral deformity with back pain, back disability in six activities of daily living, and height loss since age 25. Only 39.4% of the cohort had no vertebral deformity; 10.2% had a deformity ≥ 4 SD. Vertebral deformities < 4 SD below the mean were not associated with increased back pain, disability, or loss of height. In contrast, women whose deformity was ≥ 4 SD had a 1.9 (95% CI, 1.5–2.4) times higher risk of moderate to severe back pain and a 2.6 (95% CI, 1.7–3.9) times higher risk of disability involving the back; they were also 2.5 (95% CI, 2.0–3.2) times more likely to have lost ≥ 4 cm in height. All three types of vertebral deformity (wedge, end plate, and crush) were equally associated with these outcomes. Multiple deformities < 4 SD did not increase the likelihood of these three outcomes, but multiple deformities >≥ 4 SD tended to be associated with increased back pain, disability, and height loss. This large cross‐sectional study suggests that vertebral deformities cause substantial pain, disability, or loss of height only if vertebral height ratios fall 4 SD below the normal mean. Much back pain could not be attributed to vertebral deformities, suggesting other causes.

[1]  M. Roland,et al.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. , 1983, Spine.

[2]  G. Duckeck,et al.  Spine deformity index (SDI) versus other objective procedures of vertebral fracture identification in patients with osteoporosis: A comparative study , 1991, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[3]  S. H. Kan,et al.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  S. Cummings,et al.  A new approach to defining normal vertebral dimensions , 1991, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Appendicular Bone Density and Age Predict Hip Fracture in Women , 1990 .

[6]  R. Eastell,et al.  Classification of vertebral fractures , 1991, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  R. Recker,et al.  Normal vertebral dimensions and normal variation in serial measurements of vertebrae , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  A comparison of morphometric definitions of vertebral fracture , 1991 .

[9]  R. Ziegler,et al.  A study of complaints and their relation to vertebral destruction in patients with osteoporosis. , 1990, Bone and mineral.

[10]  H K Genant,et al.  Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. , 1990, JAMA.

[11]  S. Cummings,et al.  An examination of the association between vertebral deformities, physical disabilities and psychosocial problems. , 1988, Maturitas.

[12]  K. Maurer Basic data on arthritis knee, hip, and sacroiliac joints in adults ages 25-74 years. , 1979, Vital and health statistics. Series 11, Data from the National Health Survey.