Great apes' (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) understanding of tool functional properties after limited experience.

Primates' understanding of tool functionality has been investigated extensively using a paradigm in which subjects are presented with a tool that they must use to obtain an out-of-reach reward. After being given experience on an initial problem, monkeys can transfer their skill to tools of different shapes while ignoring irrelevant tool changes (e.g., color). In contrast, monkeys without initial training perform poorly on the same tasks. Compared to most monkeys, great apes show a clear propensity for tool using and may not require as much experience to succeed on tool functionality tasks. We investigated this question by presenting 171 apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus) with several tool-use problems without giving them initial training or familiarizing them with the test materials. Apes succeeded without experience, but only on problems based on basic properties such as the reward being supported by an object. However, only minimal experience was sufficient to allow them to quickly improve their performance on more complex problems in which the reward was not in contact with the tool.

[1]  D. Fragaszy,et al.  Choosing and using tools: capuchins (Cebus apella) use a different metric than tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). , 2005, Journal of comparative psychology.

[2]  Francesco Antinucci.  Cognitive structure and development in nonhuman primates , 1993 .

[3]  S. Savage-Rumbaugh,et al.  Performance in a tool-using task by common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). , 1995, Journal of comparative psychology.

[4]  Sarah T. Boysen,et al.  Comprehension of Cause-Effect Relations in a Tool-Using Task by Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) , 1995 .

[5]  B. Sherwood,et al.  New Perspectives in Primate Evolution and Behaviour , 2002 .

[6]  Marc D Hauser,et al.  Artifactual kinds and functional design features: what a primate understands without language , 1997, Cognition.

[7]  Laurie R Santos,et al.  Probing the limits of tool competence: Experiments with two non-tool-using species (Cercopithecus aethiops and Saguinus oedipus) , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[8]  M. Hauser,et al.  Ontogeny of tool use in cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus: innate recognition of functionally relevant features , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  J. Call,et al.  Tubes, tables and traps: great apes solve two functionally equivalent trap tasks but show no evidence of transfer across tasks , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[11]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Problem solving and functional design features: experiments on cotton-top tamarins,Saguinus oedipus oedipus , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  Francesco Natale.  Causal'ty II: The Stick Problem , 2019, Cognitive Structure and Development in Nonhuman Primates.

[13]  T. Matsuzawa.  Field experiments on use of stone tools by chimpanzees in the wild. , 1994 .

[14]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Primate Cognition , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[15]  B. Beck.  Animal Tool Behavior , 1980 .

[16]  Josep Call,et al.  Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) encode relevant problem features in a tool-using task. , 2005, Journal of comparative psychology.

[17]  Michelle Y. Merrill,et al.  Orangutan Cultures and the Evolution of Material Culture , 2003, Science.

[18]  G. Westergaard,et al.  Discrimination of functionally appropriate and inappropriate throwing tools by captive tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[19]  A. Whiten,et al.  Cultures in chimpanzees , 1999, Nature.

[20]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Apes' use of iconic cues in the object-choice task , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[21]  Hika Kuroshima,et al.  How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[22]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis , 2007, Science.

[23]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Domain-Specific Principles Affect Learning and Transfer in Children , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  G. Hunt.  Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows , 1996, Nature.

[25]  W. Köhler.  The mentality of apes, 1917. , 1948 .

[26]  Marc D. Hauser,et al.  Means-means-end tool choice in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus): finding the limits on primates’ knowledge of tools , 2005, Animal Cognition.

[27]  Marc Hauser,et al.  What experience is required for acquiring tool competence? Experiments with two callitrichids , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  Nicholas J. Mulcahy,et al.  Apes Save Tools for Future Use , 2006, Science.

[29]  D. Povinelli.  Folk physics for apes : the chimpanzee's theory of how the world works , 2003 .

[30]  Laurie R Santos,et al.  How prosimian primates represent tools: experiments with two lemur species (Eulemur fulvus and Lemur catta). , 2005, Journal of comparative psychology.