Weight threshold estimation of falling UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) based on impact energy

Abstract Different weight thresholds for drone operations have been specified by regulatory agencies in different countries, without detailed backgrounds of guidelines. Therefore, this paper aims to study weight thresholds by focusing different levels of injuries caused by the impact of the drones on human head of different weights dropped at various heights. The work covers drone free drop modelling, FEM (finite element method) based impact modeling, and comparable drop impact experiments. The analyses and experiments were conducted accordingly to two individual commercially-available groups: small and large drones in weights. Two well-established indicators defining head injuries due to impact, which are known as Head Injury Criterion (HIC) and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), are used in the present weight threshold study. The proposed AIS level for the weight threshold estimation has been set at AIS level 3, which indicates major skull fracture, in the further analysis through the probability of fatality. The main focus of the present work is to perform a parametric study and to present a reliable model to estimate the weight thresholds of the drone operations based on HIC and AIS. In conclusion, the results obtained and presented in this paper have demonstrated and provided a comprehensive analysis of possible direct injuries of a falling drone impacting a human head, with relevant data of impact or injury levels associated with HIC and AIS obtained for a drone with different weights falling from various heights.

[1]  Lewis Evans A Model of Human Harm from a Falling Unmanned Aircraft : Implications for UAS Regulation , 2017 .

[2]  Hans-Wolfgang Henn,et al.  Crash Tests and the Head Injury Criterion , 1998 .

[3]  Harold J. Mertz,et al.  The Position of the United States Delegation to the ISO Working Group 6 on the Use of HIC in the Automotive Environment , 1985 .

[4]  D. Viano,et al.  Analysis of injury criteria to assess chest and abdominal injury risks in blunt and ballistic impacts. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  Xin Li,et al.  Experimental and Simulation Weight Threshold Study for Safe Drone Operations , 2018 .

[6]  Dalong Gao,et al.  Head injury criterion , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[7]  Andrew V Shelley A Model of Human Harm from a Falling Unmanned Aircraft: Implications for UAS Regulation , 2016 .

[8]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanical Aspects of Blunt and Penentrating Head Injuries , 2005 .

[9]  Cynthia Bir,et al.  Tolerance of the skull to blunt ballistic temporo-parietal impact. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  K.P. Valavanis,et al.  Evaluating the risk of unmanned aircraft ground impacts , 2008, 2008 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.

[11]  P. Niederer,et al.  Trauma Biomechanics , 2019 .

[12]  Pascal Adalian,et al.  Effects of fall conditions and biological variability on the mechanism of skull fractures caused by falls , 2011, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[13]  C. Crowe,et al.  Engineering fluid mechanics , 1975 .

[14]  Anders la Cour-Harbo Mass threshold for ‘harmless’ drones: , 2017 .

[15]  Pascal Adalian,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of skull fractures after uncontrolled hanging release. , 2013, Forensic science international.