Dynamics of Moving Boundary Overland Flows Over Infiltrating Surfaces at Hillslopes

The three flow processes occurring on hillslopes (overland flows, streamflows, and subsurface saturated-unsaturated flows) are in dynamic equilibrium and interact continuously through their common boundaries. A physics-based, deterministic, distributed model incorporating internal coupling of the three components is developed to study the extent and location of saturated regions neighboring the streams. These saturated zones develop overland flow and are very responsive to rainfall and are therefore important contributors to the hillslope hydrograph. Using a wide channel which drains the water from the side hillslopes (resembling an open book) for a physical section, we study the response of these variable source areas (VSAs) to various hydrologic and topographic parameters. An infiltrating boundary condition, which allows for both the Horton and Dunne mechanisms of overland flow generation, is incorporated in the analysis. It is observed that the dynamic modeling of the VSAs is useful for determining the hillslope hydrograph properties.

[1]  R. Freeze,et al.  Blueprint for a physically-based, digitally-simulated hydrologic response model , 1969 .

[2]  R. Wooding,et al.  Overland flow and groundwater flow from a steady rainfall of finite duration , 1964 .

[3]  R. D. Black,et al.  Partial Area Contributions to Storm Runoff in a Small New England Watershed , 1970 .

[4]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff: 2. Upstream source areas , 1972 .

[5]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  Difference Solutions of the Shallow-Water Equation , 1967 .

[6]  J. Bathurst Sensitivity analysis of the Systeme Hydrologique Europeen for an upland catchment , 1986 .

[7]  R. D. Black,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Runoff Production in Permeable Soils , 1970 .

[8]  Keith Beven,et al.  A physically based model of heterogeneous hillslopes: 1. Runoff production , 1989 .

[9]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  Overland Flow on an Infiltrating Surface , 1971 .

[10]  E. Morris,et al.  The effect of the small-slope approximation and lower boundary conditions on solutions of the Saint-Venant equations , 1979 .

[11]  M. Kavvas,et al.  A modified diffusion equation for flood propagation in trapezoidal channels , 1986 .

[12]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of rainfall‐runoff processes on a hillslope , 1980 .

[13]  James C. Bathurst,et al.  Physically-based distributed modelling of an upland catchment using the Systeme Hydrologique Europeen , 1986 .

[14]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff: 1. Base flow contributions to channel flow , 1972 .

[15]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  On the diffusion wave model for overland flow: 1. Solution for steep slopes , 1988 .

[16]  Roger E. Smith,et al.  Mathematical simulation of interdependent surface and subsurface hydrologic processes , 1983 .

[17]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  Unsteady, one‐dimensional flow over a plane—The rising hydrograph , 1967 .

[18]  Keith Beven,et al.  Hillslope hydrographs by the finite element method , 1977 .

[19]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based model of heterogeneous hillslopes: 2. Effective hydraulic conductivities , 1989 .

[20]  D. B. Simons,et al.  Applicability of kinematic and diffusion models. , 1978 .

[21]  J.H.Daluz Vieira Conditions governing the use of approximations for the Saint-Vénant equations for shallow surface water flow , 1983 .