Comparative Analysis of a Liquid-Based Pap Test and Concurrent HPV DNA Assay of Residual Samples

OBJECTIVE To retrospectively study the HPV DNA assay of residual samples from the ThinPrep Pap Test (Cytyc Corporation, Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) PreserveCyt (Cytyc) vial as a quality improvement (QI) indicator for management of patients with abnormal cervical cytology. STUDY DESIGN Six hundred eight residual sample vials of liquid-based Pap-Test specimens were selected for the study based on Pap-test results from October 1998 to March 2001. The specimen vials were forwarded to the reference laboratory (American Medical Laboratories, Chantilly, Virginia, U.S.A.) for HPV DNA assay using the Hybrid Capture System method (Digene Corporation, Gaithersburg, Maryland, U.S.A.). At the time of HPV DNA assay, the residual samples were between 8 days to 10 months old, and each vial contained 4 mL. Of the 608 study cases, 76 were WNL, 115 contained BCC, 172 contained ASCUS, 179 were LSIL and 66 were HSIL. In this study, the 191 WNL and BCC cases were designated as the disease-free control group. The HPV DNA typing results were reported as low-risk, high/intermediate-risk or HPV DNA "not detected" HPV types. The HPV DNA testing results were compared to the Pap-Test diagnoses and statistical analysis performed. RESULTS The following information reflects the percentage of HPV DNA-positive cases based on the Pap-Test diagnoses: 16.2% in WNL and BCC, 51.1% in ASCUS, 94.4% in LSIL and 98.4% in HSIL. Sensitivity (95.5%), specificity (83.7%), false negative value (4.4%), false positive value (16.2%) and predictive value of a positive (88.3%) and negative (93.5%) Pap-Test were calculated on the basis of HPV DNA testing results for 436 cases that were diagnosed as either SIL or negative (WNL and BCC). ASCUS (172) Pap-Test cases were considered borderline--disease positive and excluded from statistical analysis. CONCLUSION The HPV DNA assay of residual samples from ThinPrep Pap-Test liquid-based specimens is an objective adjunct to the gynecologic cytology QI protocol and is the gold standard reference test for triaging women with equivocal cytologic diagnoses. The great value of HPV DNA testing is its high sensitivity (95.5%), specificity (83.7%) and negative predictive value (93.5%). HPV DNA testing results can be used as a tool to better determine the need for referrals for colposcopic biopsy, especially for patients with an ASCUS diagnosis. The residual Pap-Test specimens are stable and reproducible for HPV DNA typing. A working flow chart for our gynecologic cytology QI program was produced from the Pap-Test and HPV DNA assay results. This offer presents the added benefit of minimizing the problem of sample variation. The prevalence of HPV infection was 16.2% in this study.

[1]  T. Kline,et al.  ASCUS, Mature Metaplastic Type , 2001, Acta Cytologica.

[2]  R. Zuna,et al.  HPV DNA Testing of the Residual Sample of Liquid-Based Pap Test: Utility as a Quality Assurance Monitor , 2001, Modern Pathology.

[3]  M. Schiffman,et al.  Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: baseline results from a randomized trial. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  T. Kline,et al.  ASCUS, mature metaplastic type. Cytologic diagnosis and follow-up. , 2001, Acta cytologica.

[5]  M. Schindl,et al.  Hybrid capture based human papillomavirus typing in cervical screening compared to cytology and histology. , 2000, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift.

[6]  C. Clavel,et al.  Human Papillomavirus Detection by the Hybrid Capture II Assay: A Reliable Test to Select Women With Normal Cervical Smears at Risk for Developing Cervical Lesions , 2000, Diagnostic molecular pathology : the American journal of surgical pathology, part B.

[7]  L. Koss Human papillomavirus testing as a screening tool for cervical cancer. , 2000, JAMA.

[8]  S. Hsueh,et al.  High-risk HPV DNA detection by Hybrid Capture II. An adjunctive test for mildly abnormal cytologic smears in women > or = 50 years of age. , 2000, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[9]  J. Cuzick,et al.  HPV testing in primary screening of older women , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  R. Hiatt,et al.  Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results. , 1999, JAMA.

[11]  J Cuzick,et al.  A systematic review of the role of human papillomavirus testing within a cervical screening programme. , 1999, Health technology assessment.

[12]  A. Campana,et al.  Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA assay as an adjunct to liquid‐based Pap test in the diagnostic triage of women with an abnormal Pap smear , 1998, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[13]  T. Wright,et al.  Comparison of two tests for detecting carcinogenic HPV in women with Papanicolaou smear reports of ASCUS and LSIL. , 1998, The Journal of family practice.

[14]  M. Sherman,et al.  Determinants for genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in 1000 randomly chosen young Danish women with normal Pap smear: are there different risk profiles for oncogenic and nononcogenic HPV types? , 1997, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[15]  R. Soeters,et al.  Human papillomavirus in normal cervical smears from Cape Town. , 1996, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[16]  T. Wright,et al.  Diagnostic performance of Hybrid Capture human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid assay combined with liquid-based cytologic study. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  J. T. Cox,et al.  Human papillomavirus testing by hybrid capture appears to be useful in triaging women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. , 1995, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  C Milligan,et al.  Screening for cervical cancer. , 1975, The American journal of nursing.