Recovery from prior stimulation II: Effects upon intensity discrimination

We obtained just-noticeable differences (jnds) for the intensity of pure tones following a forward masker. The masker was a 100-ms burst of narrow-band noise centered at 1000 Hz presented at 90 dB SPL; the pure-tone signal was at 1000 Hz and was 25 ms in duration. The masker-signal delay was 100 ms. Under these conditions, there is no threshold shift for the detection of the pure-tone signal following the forward masker. In contrast with the absence of a forward-masker effect upon detection thresholds, unusually large midlevel (40-60 dB SPL) jnds were observed. These large midlevel jnds were measured as a function of signal delay, revealing that they are not completely recovered to the normal (unmasked) values by 400 ms. We interpret these data as a consequence of the slower recovery of low-spontaneous rate, high-threshold neurons following prior stimulation (Relkin and Doucet, 1990). These experiments may therefore provide psychophysical evidence that the low-spontaneous rate, high-threshold neurons are a necessary physiological component in the coding of the large dynamic range for intensity. In addition, the present data provide evidence that the assumption that the effect of forward masking is limited to 100-200 ms is inappropriate, as this recovery time does not necessarily apply to suprathreshold tasks.

[1]  Postmasking recovery of human click action potentials and click loudness. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  F G Zeng,et al.  Binaural Loudness Matches in Unilaterally Impaired Listeners , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  R. Smith.  Short-term adaptation in single auditory nerve fibers: some poststimulatory effects. , 1977 .

[5]  E F Evans,et al.  The sharpening of cochlear frequency selectivity in the normal and abnormal cochlea. , 1975, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[6]  I. Tasaki,et al.  Nerve impulses in individual auditory nerve fibers of guinea pig. , 1954, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  W. Jesteadt,et al.  Forward masking as a function of frequency, masker level, and signal delay. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J. Doucet,et al.  Recovery from prior stimulation. I: Relationship to spontaneous firing rates of primary auditory neurons , 1991, Hearing Research.

[9]  D. M. Green,et al.  Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  E M Relkin,et al.  A reexamination of forward masking in the auditory nerve. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Raimond L Winslow,et al.  Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle , 1988, Hearing Research.

[12]  N. Kiang,et al.  LIV A Survey of Recent Developments in the Study of Auditory Physiology , 1968, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[13]  S. Parker,et al.  Intensity discrimination and loudness for tones in notched noise , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  J J Zwislocki,et al.  Intensity discrimination determined with two paradigms in normal and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  I. Whitfield.  Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve , 1966 .

[16]  E. Relkin,et al.  Forward masking of the compound action potential: thresholds for the detection of the N1 peak. , 1988, Hearing research.

[17]  R. Carhart,et al.  Relations among temporal resolution, forward masking, and simultaneous masking. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  Forward masking of the compound action potential: Thresholds for the detection of the N1 peak , 1991, Hearing Research.

[19]  Alexander Joseph.  Book reviewDischarge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve: Nelson Yuan-Sheng Kiang, with the assistance of Takeshi Watanabe, Eleanor C. Thomas and Louise F. Clark: Research Monograph no. 35. Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, 1965 , 1967 .

[20]  W. G. Sokolich,et al.  On loudness enhancement of a tone burst by a preceding tone burst , 1972 .

[21]  R. Nodar,et al.  Loudness enhancement and summation in pairs or short sound bursts , 1974 .

[22]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Peripheral Auditory Processing of Speech Information: Implications from a Physiological Study of Intensity Discrimination , 1987 .

[23]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Intensity discrimination of noise in the presence of band-reject noise. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  M. Teich,et al.  A neural-counting model incorporating refractoriness and spread of excitation. II. Application to loudness estimation. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  R P Hellman.  Dependence of loudness growth on skirts of excitation patterns. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  On loudness enhancement of a tone burst by a preceding tone burst , 1974 .

[27]  M. Liberman,et al.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Edwin C. Moxon,et al.  Physiological Considerations in Artificial Stimulation of the Inner Ear , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[29]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  On Some Poststimulatory Effects at the Threshold of Audibility , 1959 .

[30]  M C Teich,et al.  A neural-counting model incorporating refractoriness and spread of excitation. I. Application to intensity discrimination. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  R. Hellman.  Effect of Spread of Excitation on the Loudness Function at 250 Hz , 1974 .

[32]  B C Moore,et al.  Pure-tone intensity discrimination: some experiments relating to the "near-miss" to Weber's law. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  R A Levine,et al.  Auditory-Nerve Activity in Cats Exposed to Ototoxic Drugs and High-Intensity Sounds , 1976, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[34]  R F Hess,et al.  Effects of flanking noise bands on the rate of growth of loudness of tones in normal and recruiting ears. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Neal F. Viemeister.  Psychophysical aspects of auditory intensity coding: Neurobiological Bases of Hearing , 1988 .

[36]  Julius L. Goldstein,et al.  Is the Power Law Simply Related to the Driven Spike Response Rate from the Whole Auditory Nerve , 1974 .