Big-data approaches lead to an increased understanding of the ecology of animal movement
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ulrike E. Schlägel | Christine E. Beardsworth | Ran Nathan | Sivan Toledo | J. Signer | P. Gupte | F. Jeltsch | Yotam Orchan | M. Whiteside | R. Arlinghaus | S. Cooke | R. Langrock | Manuel Roeleke | J. Madden | Michael Assaf | M. Říha | A. Bijleveld | S. Killen | R. Lennox | R. Harel | I. Pauwels | J. Alós | T. Klefoth | T. Brodin | I. Jarić | J. Brooks | C. Monk | G. Hellström | H. Baktoft | K. Gjelland | Emmanuel Lourie | D. Shohami | Timo Adam | Ohad Vilk | S. Westrelin | A. Campos-Candela | M. Bertram | M. Assaf | U. Schlägel | C. T. Monk | Roland Langrock | Andrea Campos-Candela
[1] Ran Nathan,et al. Memory and Conformity, but Not Competition, Explain Spatial Partitioning Between Two Neighboring Fruit Bat Colonies , 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.
[2] Ran Nathan,et al. A role for lakes in revealing the nature of animal movement using high dimensional telemetry systems , 2021, Movement ecology.
[3] Ran Nathan,et al. In situ three‐dimensional video tracking of tagged individuals within site‐attached social groups of coral‐reef fish , 2021, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods.
[4] R. Dahlstrom,et al. Challenges and opportunities , 2021, Foundations of a Sustainable Economy.
[5] Daniel W. E. Sankey,et al. Absence of “selfish herd” dynamics in bird flocks under threat , 2021, Current Biology.
[6] R. Langrock,et al. A bird's-eye view on turbulence: seabird foraging associations with evolving surface flow features , 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
[7] B. Griffen,et al. The development of animal personality across ontogeny: a cross-species review , 2021, Animal Behaviour.
[8] Ran Nathan,et al. An evaluation of machine learning classifiers for next-generation, continuous-ethogram smart trackers , 2021, Movement ecology.
[9] V. Eguíluz,et al. A standardisation framework for bio‐logging data to advance ecological research and conservation , 2021, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.
[10] P. I. Miller,et al. Sexual segregation of gannet foraging over 11 years: movements vary but isotopic differences remain stable , 2021 .
[11] Philippa R. Laker,et al. Spatial cognitive ability is associated with transitory movement speed but not straightness during the early stages of exploration , 2021, Royal Society Open Science.
[12] D. Bekkevold,et al. The battle between harvest and natural selection creates small and shy fish , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[13] Ran Nathan,et al. Ergodicity Breaking in Area-Restricted Search of Avian Predators , 2021, Physical Review X.
[14] Yehezkel S. Resheff,et al. Early-life behaviour predicts first-year survival in a long-distance avian migrant , 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
[15] R. Arlinghaus,et al. Performance of a novel system for high-resolution tracking of marine fish societies , 2021 .
[16] Christine E. Beardsworth,et al. A guide to pre‐processing high‐throughput animal tracking data , 2020, bioRxiv.
[17] M. Batty,et al. Future Developments in Geographical Agent‐Based Models: Challenges and Opportunities , 2020, Geographical analysis.
[18] Carrie J. Butts-Wilmsmeyer,et al. The technological advancements that enabled the age of big data in the environmental sciences: A history and future directions , 2020 .
[19] Travis L. Booms,et al. Ecological insights from three decades of animal movement tracking across a changing Arctic , 2020, Science.
[20] Edilson Fernandes de Arruda,et al. Learning-agent-based simulation for queue network systems , 2020, J. Oper. Res. Soc..
[21] D. Farine,et al. Shared decision-making allows subordinates to lead when dominants monopolize resources , 2020, Science Advances.
[22] Susumu Takahashi,et al. Deep learning-assisted comparative analysis of animal trajectories with DeepHL , 2020, Nature Communications.
[23] Damian G. Kelty-Stephen,et al. Point estimates, Simpson’s paradox, and nonergodicity in biological sciences , 2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[24] T. Morikawa,et al. A REAPPRAISAL , 2020, The Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics.
[25] Rory P. Wilson,et al. Why did the animal turn? Time-varying step selection analysis for inference between observed turning points in high frequency data , 2020, bioRxiv.
[26] Sergio A. Lambertucci,et al. Physical limits of flight performance in the heaviest soaring bird , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[27] R. Arlinghaus,et al. Behavioural and fitness effects of translocation to a novel environment: whole-lake experiments in two aquatic top predators. , 2020, The Journal of animal ecology.
[28] Sivan Toledo,et al. Cognitive map–based navigation in wild bats revealed by a new high-throughput tracking system , 2020, Science.
[29] Yossi Yovel,et al. The ontogeny of a mammalian cognitive map in the real world , 2020, Science.
[30] Petri T. Niemelä,et al. A guide for studying among-individual behavioral variation from movement data in the wild , 2020, Movement ecology.
[31] Paul Nührenberg,et al. High-resolution, non-invasive animal tracking and reconstruction of local environment in aquatic ecosystems , 2020, Movement ecology.
[32] Sergio A. Lambertucci,et al. A comprehensive framework for handling location error in animal tracking data* , 2020, bioRxiv.
[33] Nathan Ranc,et al. Experimental evidence of memory-based foraging decisions in a large wild mammal , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[34] Alec L. Robitaille,et al. The Ecology of Individual Differences Empirically Applied to Space-Use and Movement Tactics , 2020, The American Naturalist.
[35] David Thompson,et al. Tracking of marine predators to protect Southern Ocean ecosystems , 2020, Nature.
[36] Allison K. Shaw. Causes and consequences of individual variation in animal movement , 2020, Movement Ecology.
[37] H. Weimerskirch,et al. Ocean sentinel albatrosses locate illegal vessels and provide the first estimate of the extent of nondeclared fishing , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[38] Philippa R. Laker,et al. Is habitat selection in the wild shaped by individual-level cognitive biases in orientation strategy? , 2020, Ecology letters.
[39] Sivan Toledo. Location Estimation from the Ground Up , 2020 .
[40] Roland Kays,et al. Scale-insensitive estimation of speed and distance traveled from animal tracking data , 2019, Movement Ecology.
[41] Simon Benhamou,et al. Optimising the use of bio-loggers for movement ecology research. , 2019, The Journal of animal ecology.
[42] Ulrike E. Schlägel,et al. Movement‐mediated community assembly and coexistence , 2019, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[43] J. Tobias,et al. Movement ecology of Afrotropical birds: Functional traits provide complementary insights to species identity , 2019, Biotropica.
[44] G. Sonerud,et al. Returning for more prey? Foraging in provisioning male Boreal Owls (Aegolius funereus) , 2019, Journal of Ornithology.
[45] Ulrike E. Schlägel,et al. Estimating interactions between individuals from concurrent animal movements , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.
[46] Carlos M. Duarte,et al. Estimates for energy expenditure in free-living animals using acceleration proxies; a reappraisal. , 2019, The Journal of animal ecology.
[47] Steven J. Cooke,et al. The Ocean Tracking Network: Advancing frontiers in aquatic science and management , 2019, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.
[48] Orr Spiegel,et al. A comprehensive analysis of autocorrelation and bias in home range estimation , 2019, Ecological Monographs.
[49] Yossi Yovel,et al. Using on-board sound recordings to infer behaviour of free-moving wild animals , 2019, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[50] Marta Wayne,et al. Faculty Opinions recommendation of Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. , 2019, Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature.
[51] Mathieu Basille,et al. Navigating through the R packages for movement. , 2019, The Journal of animal ecology.
[52] Jonathan R Potts,et al. Making sense of ultrahigh‐resolution movement data: A new algorithm for inferring sites of interest , 2018, Ecology and evolution.
[53] Louise Tosetto,et al. Drone-Based High-Resolution Tracking of Aquatic Vertebrates , 2018, Drones.
[54] Klaas Deneudt,et al. A review of acoustic telemetry in Europe and the need for a regional aquatic telemetry network , 2018, Animal Biotelemetry.
[55] Jeffrey J. Buler,et al. Differential post-fledging habitat use of Nearctic-Neotropical migratory birds within an urbanized landscape , 2018, Movement Ecology.
[56] R. Arlinghaus,et al. Feeding Aquatic Ecosystems: Whole-Lake Experimental Addition of Angler’s Ground Bait Strongly Affects Omnivorous Fish Despite Low Contribution to Lake Carbon Budget , 2018, Ecosystems.
[57] Iain D Couzin,et al. From single steps to mass migration: the problem of scale in the movement ecology of the Serengeti wildebeest , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[58] Víctor M. Eguíluz,et al. How Big Data Fast Tracked Human Mobility Research and the Lessons for Animal Movement Ecology , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..
[59] Susanne A. Fritz,et al. Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements , 2018, Science.
[60] A. Manica,et al. Infections on the move: how transient phases of host movement influence disease spread , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[61] Michael Dixon,et al. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone , 2017 .
[62] Ella Browning,et al. Predicting animal behaviour using deep learning: GPS data alone accurately predict diving in seabirds , 2017 .
[63] Finn Økland,et al. Positioning of aquatic animals based on time-of-arrival and random walk models using YAPS (Yet Another Positioning Solver) , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[64] A. Farrell,et al. Ecology of Exercise in Wild Fish: Integrating Concepts of Individual Physiological Capacity, Behavior, and Fitness Through Diverse Case Studies. , 2017, Integrative and comparative biology.
[65] Charles M. Francis,et al. The motus wildlife tracking system: A collaborative research network to enhance the understanding of wildlife movement , 2017 .
[66] Franziska Broell,et al. Remote bioenergetics measurements in wild fish: Opportunities and challenges. , 2016, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.
[67] H. Weimerskirch,et al. Frigate birds track atmospheric conditions over months-long transoceanic flights , 2016, Science.
[68] Ran Nathan,et al. Adult vultures outperform juveniles in challenging thermal soaring conditions , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[69] Ruth King,et al. Statistical modelling of individual animal movement: an overview of key methods and a discussion of practical challenges , 2016 .
[70] Jonathan R. Potts,et al. Integrated step selection analysis: bridging the gap between resource selection and animal movement , 2015, 1512.01614.
[71] James K. Sheppard,et al. An autonomous GPS geofence alert system to curtail avian fatalities at wind farms , 2015, Animal Biotelemetry.
[72] M. W. Jones,et al. Step by step: reconstruction of terrestrial animal movement paths by dead-reckoning , 2015, Movement ecology.
[73] Paul S. Kemp,et al. Response of seaward-migrating European eel (Anguilla anguilla) to manipulated flow fields , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[74] I. Couzin,et al. Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons , 2015, Science.
[75] J. Kocik,et al. Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world , 2015, Science.
[76] R. Kays,et al. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet , 2015, Science.
[77] Martin Wæver Pedersen,et al. Performance Assessment of Two Whole-Lake Acoustic Positional Telemetry Systems - Is Reality Mining of Free-Ranging Aquatic Animals Technologically Possible? , 2015, PloS one.
[78] M. Snyder,et al. High-throughput sequencing technologies. , 2015, Molecular cell.
[79] Robert Weibel,et al. Integrating cross-scale analysis in the spatial and temporal domains for classification of behavioral movement , 2014, J. Spatial Inf. Sci..
[80] George Wittemyer,et al. Novel opportunities for wildlife conservation and research with real-time monitoring. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.
[81] Ran Nathan,et al. The gliding speed of migrating birds: slow and safe or fast and risky? , 2014, Ecology letters.
[82] Simon Benhamou,et al. Of scales and stationarity in animal movements. , 2014, Ecology letters.
[83] H. Eugene Stanley,et al. Anomalous diffusion and multifractality enhance mating encounters in the ocean , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[84] S. Creel,et al. Underestimating the frequency, strength and cost of antipredator responses with data from GPS collars: an example with wolves and elk , 2013, Ecology and evolution.
[85] Jeffrey F. Kelly,et al. Advances in tracking small migratory birds: a technical review of light-level geolocation , 2013 .
[86] Eoin J. O’Gorman,et al. Body Size Distribution of the Dinosaurs , 2012, PloS one.
[87] Bart Kranstauber,et al. Bias in estimating animal travel distance: the effect of sampling frequency , 2012 .
[88] Eelke O. Folmer,et al. Experimental evidence for cryptic interference among socially foraging shorebirds , 2012 .
[89] T. Laaksonen,et al. Home range size is determined by habitat composition but feeding rate by food availability in male Tengmalm’s owls , 2012, Animal Behaviour.
[90] Ran Nathan,et al. Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[91] Martin Wikelski,et al. Migration by soaring or flapping: numerical atmospheric simulations reveal that turbulence kinetic energy dictates bee-eater flight mode , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[92] D. Bojanic,et al. Impact of high-throughput screening in biomedical research , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[93] R. Arlinghaus,et al. Seasonal Carryover Effects following the Administration of Cortisol to a Wild Teleost Fish , 2010, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.
[94] G. Nolan,et al. Computational solutions to large-scale data management and analysis , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[95] I. Herfindal,et al. Screening Global Positioning System Location Data for Errors Using Animal Movement Characteristics , 2010 .
[96] E. Revilla,et al. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[97] D. Haydon,et al. Multiple movement modes by large herbivores at multiple spatiotemporal scales , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[98] G. Parisi,et al. Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[99] Ran Nathan,et al. Incorporating dispersal distance into the disperser effectiveness framework: frugivorous birds provide complementary dispersal to plants in a patchy environment. , 2007, Ecology letters.
[100] D. Paton,et al. Predicting mistletoe seed shadow and patterns of seed rain from movements of the mistletoebird, Dicaeum hirundinaceum , 2007 .
[101] Kathryn E Sieving,et al. An Experimental Test of Matrix Permeability and Corridor Use by an Endemic Understory Bird , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[102] M. Carrete,et al. Application of central-place foraging theory shows the importance of Mediterranean dehesas for the conservation of the cinereous vulture, Aegypius monachus , 2005 .
[103] Uta Berger,et al. Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.
[104] T. Devault,et al. HOME RANGES OF SYMPATRIC BLACK AND TURKEY VULTURES IN SOUTH CAROLINA , 2004 .
[105] John W. Mallord,et al. Habitat selection by song thrushes in stable and declining farmland populations , 2004 .
[106] D. Grémillet,et al. GPS tracking a marine predator: the effects of precision, resolution and sampling rate on foraging tracks of African Penguins , 2004 .
[107] P. Amarasekare. Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis , 2003 .
[108] H. Stanley,et al. Optimizing the success of random searches , 1999, Nature.
[109] William S. Curran,et al. A/I: a synthesis , 1982, ACM-SE 20.
[110] A. D. Hawkins,et al. Tracking cod Gadus morhua L. in a Scottish sea loch , 1974 .
[111] J. Craighead,et al. Satellite Monitoring of Black Bear , 1971 .
[112] Orr Spiegel,et al. What's your move? Movement as a link between personality and spatial dynamics in animal populations. , 2017, Ecology letters.
[113] N. Levanon,et al. THE BIRD-BORNE TRANSMITTER , 2015 .
[114] V. Bretagnolle,et al. Variation in home-range size and movements of wintering dabbling ducks , 2008, Journal of Ornithology.
[115] A. Alavi,et al. Opportunities and Challenges , 1998, In Vitro Diagnostic Industry in China.
[116] C. Rutz. Home range size, habitat use, activity patterns and hunting behaviour of urban-breeding Northern Goshawks Accipiter gentilis , 2006 .
[117] Tom Tregenza,et al. Building on the Ideal Free Distribution , 1995 .
[118] C.E. Shannon,et al. Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.